Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems must not cave on allowing bankruptcy judges authority to modify mortages on primary residences.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 10:06 AM
Original message
Dems must not cave on allowing bankruptcy judges authority to modify mortages on primary residences.
(We Democrats cannot bail out Wall Street and leave homeowners high and dry.)

The remaining sticking points in talks with the Treasury, Frank said, are whether to limit executive pay and whether bankruptcy judges should be given authority to modify mortgages on primary residences. But the bankruptcy provision, which is fiercely opposed by the banking industry and many Republicans, is widely viewed as a bargaining chip. And if Republican lawmakers accept limits on executive pay, the White House may find it difficult to resist.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/23/AR2008092300284_2.html?sid=ST2008092400966&s_pos=

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. This appears to be the sticking point now. Evidently, R's don't really want to help Main Street.
Frank, however, said Democrats and the Bush administration remain far apart on a proposal to give bankruptcy judges more power to adjust mortgage rates and another to limit the pay of executives who sell distressed assets to the government.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) reiterated Tuesday afternoon the importance of giving bankruptcy judges greater flexibility. He noted that judges can readjust mortgage terms if a borrower facing bankruptcy owns multiple homes.

Republicans say they are willing to curb executive compensation but remain inflexible on greater power for bankruptcy judges. One Republican familiar with the talks said the proposal would undermine the sanctity of financial contracts and could also erode the value of the very distressed assets the Treasury Department is proposing to buy.

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bailout-trips-market-dips-on-mortgages-2008-09-23_2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Has Obama specifically mentioned having bankruptcy judges intervene at the Dunedin rally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Evidently, this won't be in bill, but gov will be required to help homeowners renegotiate mortgages.
Democratic demands that Congress be given greater authority over the bailout and that the government be required to help homeowners renegotiate their mortgages so they have lower monthly payments already have been accepted in principle.

Under the bailout bill, which will let the government buy huge amounts of toxic mortgage-related assets, "we're now the biggest mortgage holder in town, and we can do serious foreclosure avoidance," Frank said.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/09/deal_said_to_be_near_on_big_fi.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC