Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AK state representative Les Gara suggests witness tampering

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 04:42 PM
Original message
AK state representative Les Gara suggests witness tampering
http://community.adn.com/adn/node/131806

From Sean Cockerham in Anchorage--

Anchorage Democratic state Rep. Les Gara has written a letter to the state troopers asking for an investigation of what he considers potential witness tampering in the troopergate investigation.

Gara's press release on it carries the headline "Legislator says McCain Campaign Tampering With Witnesses." But his letter says "I am not filing a complaint against any particular person, or alleging that a particular person has engaged in witness tampering. I do not possess that evidence."

Gara's letter, written to trooper director Audie Holloway, says several witnesses who agreed to testify in the Legislature's investigation have changed their position.

"Starting after August 29, certain staff for the McCain campaign came to Alaska in an effort to block this investigation," Gara wrote in his letter to Holloway. "There are rumors that upwards of 30 staffers have come to the state since that date. I do not know the roles of the various staff members. Campaign representatives Ed O'Callaghan and Meghan Stapleton have held numerous press conferences in Anchorage to block the investigation. Since then three witnesses have failed to comply with legislative subpoenas, and up to seven more may do the same this coming Friday."

"Something has caused, or in the words of the statute, may have "induced" these witnesses to change their position," Gara wrote. "I do not know whether it is advice from staff for the McCain campaign, state counsel, private counsel, or from others, or whether these individuals have done this independently of advice or suggestions from third persons. But it seems a witness would not risk possible jail time that comes with the violations of a subpoena without advice of others."

Sarah Palin is refusing to cooperate in the Legislature's investigation, which is supposed to be concluded Oct. 10, in favor of a separate probe by the state personnel board. There's no timeline for whether the personnel board investigation will be over before the Nov. 4 presidential election.

O'Callaghan and Stapleton have been holding near-daily press conferences, in which they claimed the Legislature's investigation is biased.

"Nobody ever told anyone not to testify," said O'Callaghan, a former New York federal prosecutor now working locally for the McCain-Palin campaign. "Individuals who were subpoenaed conferred with their individual attorneys, presumably, and made a determination to how to respond to those subpoenas."

O'Callaghan said Palin's husband, Todd, filed "lawful objections to the subpoena, through his attorney, Thomas Van Flein. And those objections were lodged with the Senate Judiciary Committee, the authority that issued the subpoena in the first place."

Anchorage Democratic Sen. Bill Wielechowski, a member of the judiciary committee, argued that's not an option for dealing with subpoenas. People subpoenaed either have to appear and testify or go to court to try and quash the subpoena, he said

"There is no option three of not attending and not filing anything with the court," he said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC