Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who has more to gain from debates at this stage: Obama or McCain?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 04:48 PM
Original message
Who has more to gain from debates at this stage: Obama or McCain?
Edited on Wed Sep-24-08 04:53 PM by kennetha
Typically, it's the trailing candidate who wants debates and more debates. Remember how Hilllary tried and failed to make an issue out of Obama's refusal to debate during the Wisconsin primary? Since McCain is tanking in the polls, one would think that he would be eager to debate -- as trailing candidates usually are. Debates are the only remaining game-changer left for McCain --especially since the election is likely to be all about the economy - his weak suit.

But, of course, he's calling for the first debate to be postponed.

Why?

Some say fear of debating. Some say an attempt to shift the spotlight away from his bad polls. Some say he's trying to lay a trap of some sort for Obama.

What's your explanation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. He is trying to stop the bleeding.
His campaign is nearing a tailspin and he is attempting to divert attention from that, trying to buy time. He knows that the debates won't help him much. He did poorly during the Primaries, and that was when his attention was diffused among 7 other losers. It will be all eyes on him and Obama, and the contrast will be stark and hurt him more.

He's running scared, and apparently out of cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Absolutely
This is a desperation move by McCain to buy time, and all it's done is to pour more gasoline on the fire of his candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Don't understand this reasoning.
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 01:31 AM by kennetha
So is this what McCain is thinking to himself:

"My polls are tanking. I'm falling way behind. And there's a debate coming up on Friday. Oh no! Not a debate! I need to avoid taking part in that debate at all costs. If I do take part in that debate, I'm going to get my clocked cleaned and my polls are going to tank even further. After all, it's not like I have anything to say on foreign policy -- which is the subject of the debate. Plus the debate will probably also get into the crisis on wall street. And I have nothing to say there either. Obama would just cream me. So i better do what I can to make these debates not happen. Oh, I know. I'll play the "I'm above politics, card." I'll manufacture a crisis I'll pretend I'm actually needed in Washington -- leading my party."

Is that seriously what you think McCain must be thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't think he is thinking
He's panicking. He can't lean on his VP because she's even more of a joke than he is at this point. They don't have any options, so they decided to stall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. McCain wants a 'time out'
He's trying to slow the Obama momentum.

The financial crisis is important but so is the election. The debate in Congress and the debate in MISSISSIPPI should not be mutually exclusive. It is important to have both. The fact that McCain does not understand this shows me how inept he really is.

Besides why is McCain in such a hurry to return to DC? Doesn't he have the worst attendance record in the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. If he's trying to slow Obama, wouldn't he debate?
An audience of 100 million people would watch the debates. What trailing candidate would willingly give up such an opportunity? That's a potential game changer -- and the only one McCain really has left. Do you think McCain is so deluded about his own situation that he can't see that he has more to gain from debates than Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SMC Beck Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. McCain Inept
It was easy to see that yesterday McCain was becoming flustered and could not keep his thoughts clear about the financial problems. He kept interchanging the words government and economy. It was ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazy_vanilla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. McCrazy knows that he is toast, so he will grab at any straw
he knows he is going to bomb at the debate, so he is looking for any and every way to avoid it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think this going back to Washington to grandstand
as the bi-partisan maverick could work in McCain's favor. You know Faux is going to play it up that the great maverick is putting politics aside for the good of the country. What a dishonorable back stabbing SOB to pull off this stunt. I think other Democrats should say McCain is using this financial crises for political gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. I think everyone knows this is for political gain......
And they better say that is what they understand, because it is.

Nobody is that stupid. Not even the American People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Sorry to say we do have people here in Ohio
that are that stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. How do you explain that even Faux has called it an ill-advised political stunt?
ALREADY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I heard Bill O'Rielly and Dick Morris saying what
a brilliant move it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. McCain
America has been raised on "sound bites".

  • 30-second commercials.
  • "punch line" sitcoms with hardly any plot
  • 10-second "action news" stories vs. in-depth reporting

    McCain has thousands of them in his arsenal. They don't even have to many any sense. They just need to sound "homey" and he's won the debate.

    Obama, much as I love the man, is a retired college professor (IIUC) and sounds like one. I slept through most of my college lectures. America (except for a tiny minority who's already voting Obama) will stop listening after the first 10 seconds, get resentful at 20 seconds, and storm out of the room to get another beer at 30 seconds.
  • Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:38 AM
    Response to Reply #9
    10. I agree almost totally
    Which raises the question, if McCain has much more to be gained from debates than Obama, then why would he call for the debate to be postponed?
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:41 AM
    Response to Original message
    12. I've started a mildly unpopular thread with my explanation
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=7175993&mesg_id=7175993

    And thus I don't think McCain actually plans on not debating. That said if hypothetically one candidate were to gain from no debates it would depend on the news cycles from now until the election. If it's another five weeks of economic bad news, then Obama could probably stay home and just keep giving McSame rope to hang himself with.

    However, if there are some major developments overseas, then Obama will want to have had the foreign policy debate to establish his commander-in-chief credentials.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:41 AM
    Response to Original message
    13. McCain's just trying to interrupt in "he's falling and can't get up" news cycle
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:45 AM
    Response to Reply #13
    16. Wouldn't the best way to do that
    be to best Obama in a debate watched by 100 million potential voters?

    Again, trailing candidates HUNGER for debates. Leading candidates are indifferent to debates. McCain isn't doing himself any obvious favor by postponing this debate.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:49 AM
    Response to Reply #16
    19. That (1) wouldn't affect the news cyle until the weekend, (2) would require McCain to win the debate
    The first is undesirable from McCain's perspective; the second unlikely.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:51 AM
    Response to Reply #19
    20. You mean McCain
    doesn't believe he can win a debate with Obama? Why, then, did he asks for so many townhall format type debates. Whether deluded or not, McCain strikes me as utterly confident in his own abilities to handle Obama.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 02:38 AM
    Response to Reply #20
    21. Because they planned to stock
    the "town halls" with supporters, thus making them not debates but traps. Cheering for McCains answers, cold to Obama. Put 14 Crowds of people on TV for hours at a time who are just shy of booing Obama, and that will shape perception.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:41 AM
    Response to Reply #20
    26. McCain likes the townhall format and doesn't like debates because debate questions are issue
    orientated and specific and come with follow up questions but townhall questions are often naive and unresearched and don't allow for follow up questions when the candidate just dumps a non-responsive soundbite in place of an answer to the question.

    McCain is utterly confident that he can wing it in a townhall meeting because that's what he does for a living -- he takes simple questions and provides soundbites in response and moves onto the next person with out allowing for a follow up.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:43 AM
    Response to Original message
    14. The trap thing is no longer an issue..
    it will take place as scheduled and Obama will hand that old coot his wrinkled ass.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:44 AM
    Response to Original message
    15. I think he needed to hide for a bit..the last two weeks have been
    horrible for him. His campaign manager gets busted on the lobbyist money, sarah is outed in the enquirer, the polls are showing him moving further and further down..plus all his stupid statements last week. He needed to regroup. I really think he didn't realize just how dumb sarah is and today it was just too much. They have lashed out at major newspapers and the list goes on and on. Plus, he wakes up this morning and his eye is drooping...he said fuck it..I need a few days off.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 02:49 AM
    Response to Reply #15
    23. Good example of what he'd do as president
    Same thins he current guy does....get confused?...take a few days off.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:47 AM
    Response to Original message
    17. it's a trick
    whether it works or not, we don't know yet

    he's trying to paint our guy as being political at a time when ordinary americans are suffering

    he's trying to make voters think O only cares about his election and politics, and not about voters' plight

    it's all an act

    but with an electorate that falls for this stuff, it may work

    another similar attempt is rethugs' attempt to say O was holding major fundraising events this past week, and not concentrating on the unfolding meltdown

    of course the meltdown was a long time coming, and no big surprise

    and the bailout is a total swindle, and it's the beginning of a dictatorship

    but will voters realize all this???





    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 01:48 AM
    Response to Reply #17
    18. this is more reasonable than other explanations offered.
    Don't know if it's right, but it's at least has the benefit of not making McCain into an utter cowering idiot who has taken leave of his senses.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 02:52 AM
    Response to Original message
    24. obama. plz, easy answer. obama will not let him get away with any lies.
    mccain was able to lie his ass off in the repub debates, obama wont let that shit slide. and biden will tear palin apart, she loses debates when shes only answering questions in a fuckin interview. this shit is in the fuckin bag. no way mccain will come out on top.

    mccain is only tryin to take over the media for a few days and see if he can get a bump out of his little stunt. hes got nothin to offer the american people. the dorks already admitted he knows dick about econ. hes useless. hes a month away and wants to suspend? its desperation. the guy is gonna try to do anything to change the momentum. it aint gonna work.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    freestyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:58 AM
    Response to Original message
    29. Obama has a chance close the deal.
    McCain has a chance to look unprepared and uninformed. There is more downside risk for McCain. Obama gets to keep looking presidential, and steady.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:16 AM
    Response to Original message
    Advertisements [?]
     Top

    Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

    Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
    Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


    Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

    Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

    About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

    Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

    © 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC