Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jimmy Carter mad a big mistake not showing up for debate...McCain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:09 PM
Original message
Jimmy Carter mad a big mistake not showing up for debate...McCain
Will do the same!! Watch and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
salonghorn70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. What Debate Did Carter Not Show Up For?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Missed all but the last one the week before the election
Missed all but the last one the week before the election, due to the presence of 3rd party candidate John Anderson "The Anderson difference."

The one debate decisively swung the election to Reagan ("There you go again, Jimmy").

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why did Carter pull out? Me don't remember this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was the hostage crisis going on at the time? A situation where lives were TRULY....
in the balance minute by minute?

I don't know if I'd call that a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep - the hostage crisis that Reagan/Bush were negotiating with Iran to keep going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ok. Then the original post is a completely jackass comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Whoops - I was wrong! he refused to debate if John Anderson (third party guy) was included
At least, according to this site, which is a celebration of Carter, so I can't imagine it's lying:

http://www.presidentprofiles.com/Kennedy-Bush/Carter-Jimmy.html

During the campaign, Carter gained ground rapidly. He did so chiefly because of Reagan's ability to generate alarm and to blunder. Seeking to rally Democrats, Carter exploited the widespread doubts about, and fears of, the former movie actor and militant champion of a tougher foreign policy and made use of the advantages that control of the White House supplied, including its ability to distribute federal grants to places in which they could influence votes. Most Kennedy people rallied behind Carter; the economy even improved some. what and soon the gap separating him from Reagan in the polls became insignificant.

If Carter failed, Anderson seemed likely to be a contributing factor. His candidacy rested on the assumption that there was a widespread lack of confidence in both of the leading candidates. "People talk about a spoiler," he remarked in defense of his role. "What's to spoil?" Fearing that Anderson would take votes away from him and detract from his efforts to focus attention on Reagan, the president refused to join in a television debate that included Anderson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ah - well then the OP is reasonable - lololol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. LOL thanks...it was a bad move..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC