2012.

[ccharles000]

Do you think Sarah will run against Obama in 2012 (Obama will most likely win the GE)?

[amitten]

1. The Pubs would never nominate her.

She's already proving to be a dud.

[cliffordu]

2. And, if I may be so abrupt, a complete fucking moron.

[amitten]

7. That's not abrupt. It's just the plain truth. n/t

[iamthebandfanman]

13. hey, apparently intelligence isnt a creditial needed n/t

[Clio the Leo]

3. If I were Barack Obama........

..... and I won, I would tape a picture of her speaking at the RNC to my bathroom mirror with the words "I'm COMING AFTER YOU!!!" below it.

Her problem now is she is uneducated .... she's not stupid.

A problem that can easily be fixed.

He better NOT screw up his first term or WE will be screwed in 2012.

Fortuantely, he doesn't do "screw up."

[book_worm]

4. It's quite possible since she is the darling of the fundie base of the party

and I think they will be looking for a true believer in 2012--they never have liked McCain and McCain will lose and they will want to go for broke with Palin. The only ? will be will Palin be around to do it? if Troopergate or something else derails her from running.

[Kool Kitty]

12. Well, she'd have four years to learn how to

answer questions, at least. She gives a beyond pathetic interview

[Boz]

15. Yeah hows that workin out for Katherin Harris, Theres the 2012 ticket Harris/Palin

[fishwax]

5. I don't think she would win the GOP nomination

I'm not sure who would--the party is going to be in such disarray after McCain loses--but I don't see that (initial interest and excitement notwithstanding) Palin has been impressing anyone other than the devotees of the religious wing of the GOP ...

[NYC_SKP]

6. The Rapture will have occurred by then... nt

[Human_Flavored_Tofu]

17. LOL

[ginnyinWI]

8. Not after the veep debate. (I can't wait.) n/t

[comrade snarky]

9. Isnt that when the worlds supposed to end anyway?

Mayan cycle and all?

Back to reality, no. They are doing their best to hide her and her weird, wacky, uninformed ass from the cameras for the next 40 days and it's not working. Four years of that? Nah. Even I don't think the public is dumb enough to fall for four years of that.

[TheKentuckian]

10. It depends on how batshit deadend they are

You'd hope they would gain some clarity and actually come to the table to help rather than harm.

I think its not a good or a smart thing to have a party that has a core value of actually destroying government. They're like a well drilled army of twisted anarchist at this point, with the belief that the role of government they march for is to impose morality and blow stuff up.

[Cirque du So-What]

11. Milfy McMooseburger won't register so much as a blip

on anyone's political radar in 2012. She won't even be the subject of a single late-show joke by that time. She's the flimsiest of ephemera, and I for one won't regret her passing from public memory into political ether.

[Yanez Houston Jordan]

14. She would get pummeled in the primary because her primary constituency is basically Huckabee's

[anonymous171]

16. It will be Romney in 2012.

Count on it.

[nyccitizen]

18. Quayle wasn't nominated in '96 and he was actually VP. Mitt's their guy. nt

[musicblind]

19. Obama will wipe the FLOOR with Palin. But you ask a good question

I always find your posts intriguing ccharles000

[Pushed To The Left]

20. I think it's a strong possibility. The Republican base is in love with her. n/t

[CarbonDate]

21. Nah, it's gonna be Mitt in 2012.

There's a reason he backed out when he did. He's already gearing up for 2012.