Bicoastal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:49 AM
Original message |
I hate to be ageist, but all this seems EXACTLY how a 72-year-old would run the White House... |
|
With plenty of break periods, erratic out-of-nowhere decisions, and the impulse to become overwhelmed when bombarded with too many issues.
I'm not saying people at this age are incompetent--FAR from it--but to all those here who are over 70: could YOU run the most powerful country in the world right now?
A business, yes. A state, perhaps. But John McCain simply does not have the energy or vitality to be put in charge of the entire US government.
|
Midlodemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message |
1. He didn't have the ability when he was 20. |
Borgnine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:51 AM
Original message |
Hell, I'm 24, and it's how I would run for president too. |
|
The difference is that I know MY limitations. I could never do the job, much less campaign for it.
Does John McCain know his?
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
2. we didn't let my 72 year old Grandpa drive or handle the remote. |
Critters2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I dunno. My dad is 73, and he's pretty good in the stamina dept. |
|
However, he's also retired. And he thinks McCain is an idiot for running at this age.
So, what do I know!
|
Morning Dew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
and he's very sharp.
That said, dad thinks there's no way McCain could have the stamina to make it through the constant grind that is the presidency.
Just look at how every one of these presidents visiblt age in office.
|
faithfulcitizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
4. The thing is he is not as healthy or sharp as most 70-80 year olds I know. |
stuntcat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
5. the evangelist types.. |
|
A lot of super-religious voters are counting on Palin being president before too long. They aren't even expecting McCain to last the next four years. I'm being serious.
|
Bicoastal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. That's awful--like Hitler being made Chancellor to an ancient Hindenburg. |
AllieB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
6. As Midlo said, this guy was lacking the brains and decision-making prowess to begin with. |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 10:52 AM by AllieB
Age has nothing to do with it. Look at Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd and other 70+ legislators. Most of them are still sharp, because they have had these skills all along.
|
Swede
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
7. During a crisis there are probably many 18 hour days,day after day. |
|
McCain just doesn't have the stamina.
|
chieftain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
8. How about an ad with the phone ringing at 3:00 pm and being |
|
unable to rouse McCain from a nap?
|
Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
9. You don't have to be ageist |
|
realize that people at all ages have a broad range of capabilities and don't make blanket statements about 72-year olds
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
11. my father is a fit, SMART 70. and i see changes in him. he ran a HUGE corp |
|
but today he couldn't do it. he doesn't have disease or anything, just getting old. still quite capable in life, not presidency. and i love and respect him dearly
i agree
and not ageist, .... but reality
|
Lucy Goosey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
13. I agree completely - don't worry about "ageism"... |
|
His age is an entirely relevant, legitimate issue, and should be discussed.
My father is 67, and he says he just wouldn't be capable. And he had a stressful, fairly high-level career, works out several times a week, and, significantly, does not have ANY medical problems, even in his past.
Part of me still can't quite believe that McCain is even the candidate. Really, Republicans? That's the best you've got?
|
trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. I agree and I'm 67 also. |
|
I had a very stressful career, too. Airline pilot. There's no way I'd take on trying to run the country.
|
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message |
14. It's not really about his age. It's the state of his mind that concerns me. |
|
My FIL is seven years older than McCain and I'd vote for him in a heartbeat. He's in great health and is sharp as a tack. McCain's physical health is shaky, and mentally, it's obvious he lost some marbles along the way.
|
ladjf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message |
16. There are many Americans as old as 72 who would be physically |
|
and mentally strong enough to be President. McCain, however, doesn't seem to be as alert and strong as the average person of 72.
|
cloudythescribbler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
17. It IS ageist, and I'd vote for Obama w/o a moment's hesitation if he were 72 and McCain 46 |
|
and that's even if Obama's resume had no more time holding national office than now, or other at least apparent "advantages" of McCain.
It's all about the person and the politics, not about the other crap. It's like people who start trying to twist into pretzels to show that Bristol Palin is relevant.
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
18. It doesn't have to be "ageist" to point out that McLame is just not |
|
up to it - perhaps he never was, not even when he was 45 or 55 or 65.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:51 PM
Response to Original message |