Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is no crisis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:42 PM
Original message
There is no crisis
The GOP just recently announce that they have considerable leverage and are using it to derail the bailout package.

Stands to reason - that there is no crisis to begin with. They would use politics ahead of the health of the entire world economy to get their way. I can't help feeling the whole thing has been manufactured at this juncture in time to bankrupt the government and hand over the mess for the dem's to clean up.

Their primary goal is to break government so it is small enough to drown in a toilet after all.

Who will blink now???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. They use words like "financial panic" and pretend the sky is falling, and then
they play games when it comes time to solve the actual problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yes, we've seen this game before
The Iraq war - weapons of mass destruction, visions of a mushroom cloud........

CALL THEIR BLUFF and call the whole thing off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "they" are not acting as one, for a change
shrub and the gang are at odds with those in the gop who are hoping to get re-elected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I don't believe that
The trap is being set right now to either bankrupt the nation with the 700 billion bailout and blame the democrats for voting for it, or allow the nation to plunge into a depression, and blame the democrats for it, because they would be in power.
These guys are not looking at the elections of 2008 - they are looking to 2012.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, conservative Republicans seem to be gaining
a lot of political capital out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holiday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I have heard "financial Pearl Harbor" several times now
gag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. ..but the House Republicans
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 04:53 PM by CJCRANE
seem to be AGAINST stopping the "financial Pearl Harbor" that Shrub has promised if the bill isn't passed. So either the Bushies are lying and there is no crisis or...

On edit: So the rebellious Republicans obviously don't believe Bush, Paulson, Bernanke etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually there is a problem.
If banks up the lending charges to each other, credit dries up, and there is a huge asset sale, especially in the battered housing market, you will be looking at disaster. There is even the possibilty municipal bonds and such won't get issued and/or credit ratings on them drop. It doesn't mean we have to go along with the Paulson plan though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. yes, but is it a crisis?
If a person was a true believer in the free market model - then allow the market to correct itself. Solving the problem by infusing more money into the system will not cure the economic trouble. Stronger regulations, refinancing, and growing the economy from the ground up, with more jobs, investing in domestic infrastructure would stabilize the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Whenever you talk about credit drying up, I think it is a crisis.
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 05:01 PM by mmonk
Do I think we should rush through it just to get a package through? No. Should we start working on it right away? Yes. I would start with a refinance system of some sort of home loans instead of a fire sale which will drive this thing down the tubes. Then there needs to be a redivision of services. Banks need to get out of the stock brokerage business or a new regulatory structure should be put into place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. You have no idea what you are atalking about
I've been following this financial meltdown closely for over a year. It is not 'manufactured' by the GOP; to assert that it is suggests that you don't really know what is going on. Anyone with a serious interest in economics could have seen it coming and many in fact did so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. It certainly was not averted by the GOP
You saw it coming and many others did - and the GOP did what....cut taxes, reduce regulations and ignored key indicators that all was not right in the world.

And a person cannot deny that they are using this as leverage - they said it themselves.

I don't believe the crisis is as bad as they insist - or else they would be more accomodating. I beleive it is a significant problem - but not a crisis. Same as Saddam Hussien was a serious problem - but not worthy of invading a sovereign nation over. This whole thing is smelling like a trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I know.
But they're sure treating it like a game now. Which is it? So bad that McCain and others can attend debates and run campaigns? Or so unimportant the situation can be toyed with? Is it urgent or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. I did.
August 14, 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. If our only other recourse was the Paulson plan, then it shouldn't go through! Fuck them!
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 04:55 PM by msallied
The plan for this bailout was beyond fucked up in the first place. If Republicans want to let the ball drop on this and let the chips fall where they may, then it will give the Democrats even MORE political capital. They'll be the ones to say that there was a deal on the table but none of the Republicans wanted to take it. John McCain is in a bigger pickle than anyone right now, because he was pushing for a plan that is being defeated by his OWN party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. True, there isn't a crisis. At the Paulsen hearing before the Senate Paulsen balked when asked to
give the U.S. taxpayers an equity stake in the companies we are bailing out. One of the Senators asked Paulsen: - "so these corporations would rather fail than give Americans an equity stake?" Paulsen replied it would be more difficult to sell the solution to the corporations if they had to do so - which tells me they really don't need this money at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. There is no spoon...
well, easy enough for me to say. I live without credit... so I couldn't care less if credit dries up. And I have no 401k, so ... ehh, whatever.

There is no spoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bush is robbing us and the only judge is history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. The events of the past 10 days have been unprecedented
any credible observer anywhere in the world will tell you that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. How convenient
That these events are - 40 odd days before a general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Every banker and banking system in the world
isn't part of some grand conspiracy to keep Republicans in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think there is a crisis, but the repukes are milking it for all it's worth n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. It reminds me of Iran Contra they're trying to slide the election somehow
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 05:13 PM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdf1234 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. How much could we get if we sell Alaska?
Would that cover the losses?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC