"Sara, Sara
Whatever made you want to change your mind
Sara, Sara
So easy to look at, so hard to define." – Bob Dylan; Sara; from Desire.
As we approach the vice presidential debate later this week, I find it interesting to read some of the growing number of news articles that question if Sarah Palin is qualified to serve in national office. Below are parts of three articles that I think DUers may enjoy.
{1} Miami Herald; 9-28-08
If Palin were a Male Candidate …. (Carl Hiaasen)
…..Most journalists are still getting accustomed to the Sarah Rules, as established and enforced by John McCain's campaign team. The most important is Sarah Rule No. 1: Don't treat Gov. Palin like a male candidate, or you'll be accused of character assassination.
Maybe this is why McCain has kept Palin sequestered from the press -- not because he's terrified she'll pull a Dan Quayle and say something goofy (as she did to Katie Couric), but because he gallantly wants to protect her from all the chauvinist meanies who would ask impertinent questions. ….
If Palin were a male candidate, for example, she would again be asked (as Charles Gibson did) why she took credit for killing Alaska's notorious Bridge to Nowhere, when in fact she supported the $223 million boondoggle until Congress turned against it.
If Palin were a male candidate, she might also be encouraged to discuss why she chose a high-school pal to head Alaska's Division of Agriculture at a $95,000 salary. Among her flimsy qualifications, the woman, a former real-estate agent, claimed an affection of cows.
If Palin were a male candidate, she'd be asked why she put another childhood friend in charge of a money-losing, state-subsidized creamery that was supposed to shut down until Palin reversed the decision. As The Wall Street Journal reported, the doomed dairy cost Alaskans more than $800,000 in additional losses before it was finally closed. ….
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/columnists/carl-hiaasen/story/703133.html{2} PoliGazette; 9-27-08
Republicans Worry: Palin’s A Problem (Michael van der Galien)
Increasingly more conservative republicans are starting to worry that Governor Sarah Palin, the party’s candidate for vice president, is hurting her party more than helping it. …
….this election is not going to be decided by the base alone; McCain will have to win over independent voters if he wants to beat Obama.
In that regard, Palin may very well do more damage than good.
Every time that Palin has agreed to give an interview on television she has come across as uninformed, uninterested, and generally not ready for any national office, let alone second in rank.
The above has caused several conservative commentators to call on Palin to drop out. …
http://poligazette.com/2008/09/27/republicans-worry-palins-a-problem/{3} Washington Post; 9-23-08
Palin on Thin Ice (Ruth Marcus)
…..The way she answers questions brings to mind -- I have Alaska on the brain, admittedly -- the image of a polar bear, jumping from rhetorical ice floe to ice floe, drifting some but eventually managing to get safely to dry land. No flubs, but you get the sense that she could plunge into the icy water at any moment. Palin has an odd tendency to use the same word twice in a sentence, as in, "The people of American realize that inherently all political power is inherent in the people," or, about John McCain, "He can surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this." Or, combining word repetition with another Palin verbal tic, word dropping, this about the economic meltdown: "Well, you know, first Fannie and Freddie, different because quasi-government agencies there where government had to step in because the adverse impact all across our nation, especially with homeowners, is just too impacting."
Ok, not everyone is Daniel Webster. ….Yet I always got the sense listening to George W. Bush tying himself up in rhetorical knots that his problem was more in the nature of getting the words to come out of his mouth correctly, not so much that he didn’t know what to say. Palin -- I’m not so sure ….
Consider this exchange.
Hannity: What is our role as a country as it relates to national security?
Palin: Yes. That's a great question, and being an optimist I see our role in the world as one of being a force for good, and one of being the leader of the world when it comes to the values that -- it seems that just human kind embraces the values that -- encompass life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and that's just -- not just in America, that is in our world.
And America is in a position because we care for so many people to be able to lead and to be able to have a strong diplomacy and a strong military also at the same time to defend not only our freedoms, but to help these rising smaller democratic countries that are just -- you know, they're putting themselves on the map right now, and they're going to be looking to America as that leader.
We being used as a force for good is how I see our country.
Whew. Made it to the other side of that one.
Can’t wait for the debate. I bet it will be impacting.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2008/09/palin_on_thin_ice.html