Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACORN's Response to McCain's Lies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 12:39 PM
Original message
ACORN's Response to McCain's Lies
ACORN President Maude Hurd released the following statement today in response to the McCain campaign's new ad claiming that, among other things, ACORN is responsible for the mortgage crisis:

”For almost a decade, ACORN, a community organization of 400,000 families in neighborhoods across the country, has been fighting against the predatory lending practices that have robbed our members of their homes, destabilized neighborhoods, and roiled the global economy.”

“In his newest ad, John McCain’s campaign bizarrely claims, “ACORN forced banks to issue risky home loans, the same types of loans that caused the financial crisis we're in today.” Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, ACORN has worked successfully to help working class families get good home loans on fair terms from legitimate banks and has fought vigorously against predatory lenders who have ripped off families in our communities. These predatory loans caused the crisis.”

“For more than a decade, ACORN members have held protests, released reports, and advocated for regulations to protect homeowners from predatory lenders. ACORN organizers and volunteers have been working day and night to help victims of the GOP economic meltdown to save their homes from foreclosure. In fact, ACORN has brought class action lawsuits against several predatory lenders, and has lobbied the Federal Reserve and Congress in support of regulations against predatory lending. ACORN has even been successful in convincing many lenders to treat homeowners more fairly and help families be able to make their mortgage payments and save their homes.”

“Unfortunately, the Bush administration and Congressional Republicans like John McCain have blocked the sensible regulations that ACORN and others proposed that would have averted the mortgage meltdown. If John McCain thinks that community organizers caused the foreclosure crisis, he knows even less about the economy than previously thought.”

”John McCain and the Republicans are desperately trying to shift the blame for the economic crisis they caused with a philosophy of deregulation and indifference to homeowners. All the grainy footage and creepy music in the world can't cancel out some simple, basic facts, and the facts about the economy are not on John McCain's side.”

###

Bogus "Voter Fraud Charges" Aim to Camouflage Voter Suppression

ACORN has just completed the largest, most successful nonpartisan voter registration drive in US history. We helped 1.3 million low-income, minority and young voters across the country register to vote.

Unfortunately, just as in 2006, that success in bringing people into the democratic process, have been greeted with unfounded accusations to disparage our work and help maintain the status quo of an unbalanced electorate.

After a similar spate of charges against ACORN in 2006, we learned that then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had fired Republican US Attorneys because they refused to prosecute ACORN and other voter assistance groups on trumped up fraud charges. This was the heart of the US Attorney-gate scandal that led Karl Rove, Gonzales and other top Department of Justice officials to resign. Because the press didn’t catch on until long after the election, it was part of a successful strategy to create an unfounded specter of voter fraud and to suppress voting.

Key Facts:

1. In order to help 1.3 million people register to vote, we hired more than 13,000 registration assistance workers r. As with any business or agency that operates at this scale, there are always some people who want to get paid without really doing the job, or who aim to defraud their employer. Any large department store will have some workers who shoplift.

2. Any large voter registration operation will have a small percentage of workers who turn in bogus registration forms, Their goal clearly is not to cast a fraudulent vote. It is simply to defraud their employer, ACORN, by getting a paycheck without earning it. ACORN is the victim of this fraud – not the perpetrator.

3. In nearly every case that has been reported , it was ACORN that discovered the bad forms, and called them to the attention of election authorities, putting the forms in a package that identified them in writing as suspicious, encouraging election officials to investigate, and offering to help with prosecutions. We are required by law to turn in all forms, but instead of just turning them in and figuring that it is the responsibility of the board of elections to figure out which are valid, we spend millions of dollars verifying that forms are valid, and then separate out those that are suspicious.

4. This has nothing to do with “voter fraud” – nothing at all to do with anyone trying to cast an extra vote. There has never been a single reported instance in which bogus registration forms have led to anyone voting improperly. To do that, they would have to show up at the polls, prove their identity as all first-time registrants must, and risk jail. The people who turned in these forms did so not because they wanted an extra vote, but because they didn’t care enough to make sure eligible people got to vote at all.

5. When a department store calls the police to report a shoplifting employee, no one says the department store is guilty of consumer fraud. But for some reason, when ACORN turns voter registration workers over to the authorities for filling out bogus forms, it gets accused of “voter fraud.” This is a classic case of blaming the victim; indeed, these charges are outrageous, libelous, and often politically motivated.

6. Similar attacks were launched against ACORN and other voter registration organizations in 2004 and 2006. The bogus charges were at the heart of the U.S. Attorney-gate scandal that led to the resignations of Karl Rove, Attorney General Ablerto Gonzales and other top Justice Department Officials. It turned out that it was the charges that were fraudulent, and that they were part of a systematic partisan agenda of voter suppression. Republican US Attorneys David Iglesias (NM), Todd Graves (MO), and John McKay (WA) all were fired primarily because they refused to prosecute similar bogus charges of “voter fraud.” Another US Attorney, Bradley Schlozman, who did politicize prosecutions against former ACORN canvassers, was forced to acknowledge under cross examination by the Senate Judiciary Committee that ACORN was the victim of fraud by its employees and ACORN had caught the employees and had identified them to law enforcement.

7. The goals of the people orchestrating these attacks are to distract ACORN from helping people vote and to justify massive voter suppression. That’s the real voter fraud; the noise about a small fraction of the forms ACORN has turned in is meant to get the press and public take their eyes off the real threat, while those hurling the charges are stealing people’s right to vote in broad daylight. They have already tried to prevent Ohio from registering voters at its early voting sites. In Michigan, they planned to use foreclosure notices to challenge thousands of voters. And if this year is like past years, they are preparing to use this so-called voter fraud to justify massive challenges to voters in minority precincts on Election Day.

The Details:

Fact: ACORN has implemented the most sophisticated quality-control system in the voter engagement field but in almost every state we are required to turn in ALL completed applications, even the ones we know to be problematic.

Fact: ACORN flags in writing incomplete, problem, or suspicious cards when we turn them in,. Unfortunately, some of these same officials then come back weeks or months later and accuse us of deliberately turning in phony cards. In many cases, we can actually prove that these are the same cards we called to their attention.

Fact: Our canvassers are paid by the hour, not by the card . ACORN has a zero-tolerance policy for deliberately falsifying registrations, and in the cases where our internal quality controls have identified this happening we have fired the workers involved and turned them in to election officials and law-enforcement.

Fact: No criminal charges related to voter registration have ever been brought against ACORN or partner organizations. Convictions against individual former ACORN workers have been accomplished with our full cooperation, using the evidence obtained through our quality control and verification processes — evidence which in most cases WE called to the attention of authorities

Fact: Most election officials have recognized ACORN’s good work and praised our quality control systems. Even in the cities where election officials have complained about ACORN, the applications in question represent less than 1% of the thousands and thousands of registrations ACORN has collected.

Fact: Our accusers not only fail to provide any evidence, they fail to suggest a motive: there is virtually no chance anyone would be able to vote fraudulently, so there is no reason to deliberately submit phony registrations. ACORN is committed to ensuring that the greatest possible numbers of people are registered

ACORN will not be intimidated, we will not be provoked, and in this important moment in history we will not allow anyone to distract us from these vital efforts to empower our constituencies and our communities to speak for themselves.


###
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice article - but it could use a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good post. The freepers are really pushing the word ACORN...
on other sites. We need to be able to counter their attacks.

However, we do need a link. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Here is a link for you to reference...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here is a link if anyone needs it - Comes from After Downing Street......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for the post. Very enlightening. The woman in the Indiana elections office who
was featured on Thursday night on Anderson Cooper's show was holding a thick sheaf of registration forms that she said were bogus. The examples they showed sure as hell looked bogus. Of course, the insinuation was that ACORN had knowingly and fraudulently turned in 5000 registration forms, almost half of which were bogus. It would be nice to know if those bogus forms were flagged by ACORN, or if the woman who was showing them to CNN had any "political bias". If you know what I mean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Point by point
Fact: ACORN has implemented the most sophisticated quality-control system in the voter engagement field but in almost every state we are required to turn in ALL completed applications, even the ones we know to be problematic.


True, sort of. You require canvassers to get phone numbers on the cards or the cards don't count toward their daily quota. Then you call the number to confirm the voter as well as independently confirming the information. Balanced against a mediocre / non existent training and screening process, and the real concern becomes that inept canvassers get incomplete cards rather than fraudulent cards. With an incomplete card, the person thinks they're registered but won't be, and won't reregister with another group. According to the local registrar, ACORN's rate of incomplete cards is far higher than other groups. (Every registration group will get incomplete cards, the question is how many.)

Fact: ACORN flags in writing incomplete, problem, or suspicious cards when we turn them in,. Unfortunately, some of these same officials then come back weeks or months later and accuse us of deliberately turning in phony cards. In many cases, we can actually prove that these are the same cards we called to their attention.


True.

Fact: Our canvassers are paid by the hour, not by the card . ACORN has a zero-tolerance policy for deliberately falsifying registrations, and in the cases where our internal quality controls have identified this happening we have fired the workers involved and turned them in to election officials and law-enforcement.


Deceptive. Canvassers aren't paid by the card, but if they don't make quota (which is set at a borderline unrealistic) they get fired. True however that they fire someone once there is the hint of possible fraud.

Fact: No criminal charges related to voter registration have ever been brought against ACORN or partner organizations. Convictions against individual former ACORN workers have been accomplished with our full cooperation, using the evidence obtained through our quality control and verification processes — evidence which in most cases WE called to the attention of authorities


True. The moment your skewed and harsh incentives force some broke desperate canvasser living paycheck to paycheck who only took your barely above min wage job because he couldn't get anything else that you never screened for to fake a card to not get fired you turn him over without a care in the world.


Fact: Most election officials have recognized ACORN’s good work and praised our quality control systems. Even in the cities where election officials have complained about ACORN, the applications in question represent less than 1% of the thousands and thousands of registrations ACORN has collected.


Not enough information for me to answer properly. I will say that the election officials here in Nevada certainly don't have anything to say decent about this group. And neither do other voter registration campaigns that had to work in their vicinity. They almost had Truckee Meadows Community College kick ALL voter registration groups off campus because ACORN's workers were being overly aggressive to the point of borderline harassment. That was a fun conversation and loss of valuable canvassing time, explaining that we're not ACORN so please let us do our thing like we have been doing.


Fact: Our accusers not only fail to provide any evidence, they fail to suggest a motive: there is virtually no chance anyone would be able to vote fraudulently, so there is no reason to deliberately submit phony registrations. ACORN is committed to ensuring that the greatest possible numbers of people are registered


Motive right here: You're an organization that does admirable work for the poor and disadvantaged, but you don't have the all the funding necessary to affect elections properly. So you try to run campaigns on the cheap. Your pathetic labor practices encourage this kind of fraud as a systemic attribute.

In summary, no, this kind of fraud is not dangerous to Democracy. No, it isn't some grand plan to cheat and win an election. Yes, the media is overhyping this to the point of ridiculousness. Yes, other progressive organizations and individuals, including me, are grateful for the work you do. No, we do not approve of your methods. Treat your workers properly, train them properly, and screen new hires properly. It doesn't cost that much more, and it saves all of us face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thanks for the informative post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. K and R
Good to see this on their front page. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. "All the grainy footage and creepy music in the world..."
That's great!

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rancid Crabtree Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. voter fraud...
Officials from all political persuasions have raised red flags concerning questionable voter registrations. I don't see how one equates questioning what could turn out to be illegal practices--and I believe I read/heard on the news that this was proven and acted on in one or more situations--I don't see how one equates questioning something like that to voter suppression. There have also been reports of folk voting more than once. Fraud should be pursued and prosecuted. From what I know, it seems like it would be relatively easy for one person to cast more than once vote and any attempt at using a photo i.d. is disparaged as discriminatory. When the electorate loses confidence in the ballot box, you have situations like The Battle of Athens, Tennessee. Can't happen? Doesn't happen? Untrue? The sanctity of the ballot box shouldn't be a partisan issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Very interesting stuff
"After a similar spate of charges against ACORN in 2006, we learned that then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had fired Republican US Attorneys because they refused to prosecute ACORN and other voter assistance groups on trumped up fraud charges. This was the heart of the US Attorney-gate scandal that led Karl Rove, Gonzales and other top Department of Justice officials to resign."

Wow! Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. I don't know why McCain felt he had to buy airtime
Edited on Mon Oct-13-08 12:35 AM by pam4water
CNN and Fox News have been flogging this story since Friday. CNN barely covered the abuse of power report on Sarah Palin and gave only a passing reference to the increased hostility of the McCain Palin crowds. But it spent a lot of time on ACRON registration fraud allegations. Lou Dobbs criticized ACRON three times this week and Larry King is a special segment on the voter registration story. Lou Dobbs is also been kicking around the accusation that the subprime problems were exacerbated by acorn. Because either he or his staff reads the Heritage Foundation page. Anderson Cooper was actually kind of balanced for change. Cooper's coverage of the alleged voter registration fraud was comparatively short. There was a definite Swift boat feel to their coverage. it does seem people of why stop to CNN's coverage of the elections. Obviously the people who watch Fox News are the ones are never in a wise up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC