Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin may not be able to cash in on fame (it's not clear what constitutes "employment)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 08:16 PM
Original message
Palin may not be able to cash in on fame (it's not clear what constitutes "employment)

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20081031/D945OE800.html

Oct 31, 6:26 PM (ET)

By HILLEL ITALIE and ANNE SUTTON

NEW YORK (AP) - If her bid for vice president fails, Gov. Sarah Palin could almost surely use her sudden fame to obtain a lucrative book deal or high fees on the lecture circuit, or even get her own TV talk show. But Alaska law might not allow it.

A provision of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act restricts outside employment. It says: "The head of a principal executive department of the state may not accept employment for compensation outside the agency that the executive head serves."

Senior Assistant Attorney General David Jones said the section likely applies to the governor but it's not clear what constitutes "employment."



Simple enough to me. She gets a check, she is employed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. You really think a law or a rule will stop her?
She's a repub, rules don't apply.

Well, maybe she should talk to her mentor, stevens about that. Afterall, I hear he's a man of many convictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. She'll just put any deals under her husband's name
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 09:12 PM by rainbow4321
Since HE is not employed by the state. That way, she/they still get the $$ and it won't be her being "employed" or "compensated"

Then they will do some fancy deduction math on their tax returns (again) and somehow make more money off THAT money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC