Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republican Mental Meltdown Continues: Desperately Trying to Prove Obama Book Ghostwritten

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:12 PM
Original message
The Republican Mental Meltdown Continues: Desperately Trying to Prove Obama Book Ghostwritten
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 05:13 PM by Walter Sobchak
by Bill Ayers.


The Republicans have made a last-minute attempt to prevent Barack Obama’s ascent to the White House by trying to recruit an Oxford academic to “prove” that his autobiography was ghostwritten by a former terrorist.

With two days to go before the election, Obama is poised to become America’s first black president, according to polls showing he has an average six-point lead over John McCain, his Republican opponent.

Dr Peter Millican, a philosophy don at Hertford College, Oxford, has devised a computer software program that can detect when works are by the same author by comparing favourite words and phrases.

He was contacted last weekend and offered $10,000 (£6,200) to assess alleged similarities between Obama’s best-seller, Dreams from My Father, and Fugitive Days, a memoir by William Ayers.

---

The offer to Millican to prove that Ayers wrote Obama’s book was made by Robert Fox, a California businessman and brother-in-law of Chris Cannon, a Republican congressman from Utah. He hoped to corroborate a theory advanced by Jack Cashill, an American writer.

---

Millican took a preliminary look and found the charges “laughably unsubstantiated”. A deal was agreed for more detailed research but when Millican said the results had to be made public, even if no link to Ayers was proved, interest waned.

Millican said: “I thought it was extremely unlikely that we would get a positive result. It is the sort of thing where people make claims after seeing a few crude similarities and go overboard on them.”


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5063279.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of all the stupid things the Republicans say in this election
This one is the most batshit insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm surprised they haven't accused Khalidi, Rezko, Wright and ACORN
of collaborating in the ghostwriting. Why stop at just Ayers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Republicans used to have a party they could be proud of.
What a pile they've become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh? When was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. 1959, though there was that unfortunate VP choice of Ike's n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. This morning I caught an interview with Studs Terkel from last year.
"Me and Nixon, neo Cartesians! I think, therefore I tape!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. You can stream the interview on BookTV,.org
He was little and shrunken and huge and tremendous.

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Wasn't the party formed in opposition of allowing slavery in Kansas?
I may be a lot older than you, Bloo, but I don't personally remember that. lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Oh - ok. A brazillion years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I'm not very familiar with their stuff until they decided it was a good idea
to inflame racists with the so called "Southern Strategy".

My dad is one of those Republicans that joined the party before they decided to do that. I think he's been sort of in shock ever since.

That wasn't so long ago, when you think about it. We're still trying to figure out the 60s, you young whippersnapper.

But, seriously, the Republican party used to be a respectable organization. Not like the cartoon it is now. If we have to have only two parties in this country, it's sort of unbelievable to people like me that remember a different time that people like that Nazi cow, Sarah Palin, can be speaking for one of them. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. If it's before 75% of the population was alive, then it's a long time ago...
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Just you wait.
:evilgrin:

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. heeheehee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Now that redefines the term "grasping at straws". Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Serves them right. They are so desperate to find anything to smear
Obama with they are willing to make fools of themselves and their party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. they were going to spend 10,000 bucks on that
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 05:21 PM by Enrique
man, someone really could make a bunch of money off their desperation. I wish I had the imagination to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. You guys missed this one???
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 05:28 PM by TwoSparkles
Oh geez, I saw that allegation over at Freeperland about a month ago.

When I saw this story, they were (and I kid you not) dividing up into "research groups"
and they were all "investigating" and trying to help this Cashill person verify
his claims.

I went to Cashill's site, and I nearly peed my pants laughing. He's a writer who asserts
that the Obama and Ayers books have "similar language" and that they are written by the
same person.

One of his nuggets of wisdom included that Ayers used many references to the sea and to the
ocean in his writings. Cashill noticed that Obama used a few as well. Oh noez! It can't
be! Cashill asserted that Obama never knew anything about the ocean! How could he talk
about the ocean when he didn't work in it or have any extensive experience with the ocean--as Ayers did?

I literally LOL several times before I left that site. You guys should check it out.

At this point, the freepers on that site are like a bunch of caged rats, feeding off of each other's
droppings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Apparently they don't want to dig too deep though, since they were unwilling
to pay the guy if he published the results showing their theory was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Obama and Ayers books have "similar language" - they're correct on that one
They're both written in English.

Stupid fucking morans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Maybe Richard Bach ghostwrote both Ayers and Obama's books
with all the references to the sea.

(Jonathan Livingston Seagull author)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
14.  “laughably unsubstantiated”. McC's hallmarks!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. Christ, the 'pubs back when did the same to Kennedy.
They never change from their assholish selves, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. I have it on good authority that Karl Marx actually ghost-wrote that book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC