Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

65%.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 01:18 AM
Original message
65%.
65%.
























President Bill Clinton's approval rating when he left office.












27%.

"One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief. My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it. If I have a chance to invade---if I had that much capital, I'm not going to waste it. I'm going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I'm going to have a successful presidency."
-George W. bUsh, total failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. You are confusing public approval with success.
They aren't the same thing.

bush succeeded better than any President I've seen in the last forty years.

I hate what he accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He certainly succeeded at destruction.
Even caused more American deaths than Osama bin Laden.


The filthy rich love what he accomplished. He made them richer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooRaLoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Success is not simply getting what one wants. Not by any stretch. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. You are implying that Bush is competent
Bush didn't try to destroy this country, he just fucked up with his crazy ideas.

Remember Mission Accomplish? The neocons wanted to be out of Iraq in a couple months so they can invade the next country. How did that work out for them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I disagree. I think the Neocons planned to stay in Iraq for a long time.
That's why we started building permanent bases there almost immediately. The Neocons wanted us to have a permanent military presence there to guard all the oil supplies in the region. In fact, we may end up staying there for exactly that reason.

The United States is a LIBERAL Country.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. They wanted bases like we have in Germany
The neocons plan was that there will be a democracy flourishing in Iraq after a short time period, which the US could use as in influence on other nations in the region and also allow them to have access to oil. They expected it to be a peaceful country within a short period of time, that the oil revenue will pay for itself. Rumsfield imagined a bunch of cheap and short war, not a long dragged out one.

The execution of this plan has been terrible to say the least. These guys were living in a fantasy world with a broken ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. It was a bad idea from the very beginning.
You can't just "plant" a democracy and expect it to work. Cultural and economic conditions have to be right, and the people have to want it. The minority Sunnis, who held power through Saddam Hussein, had no interest in handing over power to the majority Shiites. It was insane to believe that a democracy could or would work in Iraq as the nation is currently configured.

So, while I agree that the execution was flawed, the real problem was that the idea, itself, was flawed.

The United States is a LIBERAL Country.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Implying nothing. I'm flat out stating it. Read the shock doctrime to learn about
the far right idea of "creative destruction."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I still think you give him too much credit
It doesn't take a genius to completely fail at everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. his first term was arguably a success, but not his second
his first term, while a disaster for the vast majority of this country and all that is good in the world, served the interests of his narrow set of those rich and corrupt enough to make significant bribes campaign contributions. he increased the power of the fascist wing of the republican party. a loss to kerry might have them well for a long time as the shit might well have hit the fan with a democrat in power.

his second term has been an abject failure by any metric. his narrow group of greedy bastard donors lost money, a cardinal sin among fascists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Which bush cronies are getting by on foodstamps? Can you name one?
While their corporations may be gutted, that has no bearing on their personal fortunes. It's the whole reason for corporations after all, to limit personal liability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's better than that. We reward failure on the executive level in the U.S.
10% of the $700 Billion dollar bailout will go to to executive pay and bonuses for the Wall Street firms who have caused the historic financial melt down we are experiencing in this country and that is being felt around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. i said "lost money", not "on food stamps"
the economy has a HUGE impact on the wealth of these people. you're correct that they rarely risk that last few million of their personal fortune, so they'll never be "poor" even if they fail miserably. but they could have made many brazillions had their companies earned big profits; instead their companies are posting losses and they get nowhere near what they might have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Simular to Enron or the Savings and Loan failures they lose other peoples money.
It looks bad and is momentarily embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. true but misses the point.
the point was that they prefer making obscene amounts of money, not escaping with a golden parachute. shrub failed them because he created a disasterous economic environment where it was hard to make oodles and oodles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love it....George W.Bush:TOTAL FAILURE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC