Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama on track to be first Dem to win with more than 50% since 1976

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:26 PM
Original message
Obama on track to be first Dem to win with more than 50% since 1976
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. No comment? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Poor Bill Clinton
Perot kept him from claiming a handsome popular vote majority in both '92 and '96. Certainly in '96, Clinton's 49% would almost certainly have been at least a few points higher without Perot in the race (even if you assume that 2/3 or Perot '96 voters would have voted for Dole).

Hell, even WITH Perot, Clinton would probably have gotten more than 50% had turnout been decent -- instead, turnout in '96 was dreadful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think Perot drew from both candidates,
but more from Republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Polls in '92 had him drawing evenly from both
Exit polls showed Clinton would only have lost Ohio without Perot in the race. And when Perot sat out the race between July and Oct '92, polls had Clinton CRUSHING Bush.

Without Perot, Clinton would probably have won by a similar margin as that by which Obama looks set to beat McCain. It would have been something like 52-46 for Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. In '96 without Perot he certainly would have won more than 50%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Most likely. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC