Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm hearing Rachel talk about the "poll tax" of extremely long lines, what's a good solution?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:30 PM
Original message
I'm hearing Rachel talk about the "poll tax" of extremely long lines, what's a good solution?
I'm genuinely ignorant about this problem. Are there good ways to shorten wait times that are feasible? Is it just to simply add more polling booths? If it's that simple, why not just do that? I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:32 PM
Original message
One solution would be to vote like Oregon does, by mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm curious about that, is there a website that explains pros/cons of mail-in voting?
I've always wondered about votes getting lost in the mail, stolen out of mailboxes and such. It seems like it would be hard to implement nationwide on the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. I don't know.
Maybe there's an Oregon voting site that explains it better. Yeah, I could see problems with mailbags full of votes getting "lost" in strategic areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, add more booths. The only reason for not doing it is the desire to keep people from voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. yep
areas need to put in more booths and get more workers.

there is no need for long lines. it's complete bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayfoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. AMEN! And ALL states need to have early voting with adequate facilities!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Absolutely bull! This is America for Christ's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. What is the problem ? Just that or is it the states are cheap?
I swear half the time people are more in line with the b----ing than paying for anything to be done right. I hope I will not have to wait long as I need a ride to and back from the polls. In all the years I have voted only once have I had to wait for hours. Next time should be even more interested as I have read that Bush has sort of cut off the money that goes for the next cen. count and that being done badly will play into the way we vote for years. If you do not know who is living around you it is hard to set up how many will vote. The thinking of the 'crazies' in the power part of the GOP is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Make election day a federal holiday is a good start, or Saturday.
Cut this crap of having to compete with inflexible work schedules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. bingo!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. I agree! GOOD solution. Make it a required holiday. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. Some people work on holidays and weekends (ie. fast food workers)
So that won't help. WAY more machines and WAY more locations. That's the only fair way to solve the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. There will always be shift workers, such as medical care
but if you move voting to a day where most people don't work, one way or another, you eliminate the penalty that many pay by having to take off work - both to vote as well as to volunteer to help. Plus by making it mandatory, if the choice was to make a weekday voting holiday, you eliminate the bastard employers who are too cheap to let people have the time off to exercize their right to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Early voting in every state would be great as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I keep complaining about this too.
But it's obvious that these machines cost money and municipalities obviously don't have enough to adequately equip polling sites. For those who have paper ballots, I expect this isn't an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. It costs more money to add more polling booths (and that IS the solution)
and states don't want to pay up. But NEWSFLASH to the states, they better fucking pay up and ensure that people are not standing in line for over 2 hours to vote. This is the FOUNDATION of our country. PERIOD.

I'm glad she gave this a special comment. Democrats should be ashamed for not making this an issue before now but hopefully something will be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. The mail-in system they have in Oregon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. they could have done that. There are not enough machines for the number of voters
Why that happened? I don't know, but they didn't make enough voting machines availble for the number of voters. Far less than what is available for election day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salonghorn70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. I Don't Have A Solution
but it seems that the whole idea of of election reform might be one that we will want to think about. I thought that it was interesting that not one question was asked about this in the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. You're kidding, right? I live in a wealthy area. I NEVER have to wait more than 15 min. to vote
It's voter suppression, pure and simple. There should be some kind of LAW requiring a certain percentage of polling booths per person, based on registered voters in each precinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosillies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Weird thing -- the early voting place in the wealthy area near me has the longest waits
I went across town to vote because the lines were shorter in the "bad" area. Still long, mind you, but shorter than in the upscale area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Voting lines lasting 10 hours in dem areas can change poll results
Edited on Sun Nov-02-08 09:36 PM by dmordue
More people in Ohio in 2004 gave up waiting in long lines than separated Kerry from the presidency

They love to make college students wait for hours to discourage them from voting - also done in Ohio in 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missouri Girl Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think 2 things -
Paper ballots that can be scanned and saved as a trail. Paper can be filled out, no need for more equipment, electricity, easy set up (pencils and a table).

Early voting. We don't have early voting here in Missouri - Baby Blunt knows that if early voting is allowed, more folks in KC and St. Louis, our hard working middle class, would have more opportunities to vote. We can't have that because they would trend Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Optical scan is cheaper, yeah. Electronic voting machines feel like corporate welfare.
There's no advantage; they're just more expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. Just to clarify, they are all electronic systems
I think your point was to refer to touch screen systems, which I largely agree on, and that optical scan allows more (inexpensive) ballot stations with a single scanner per precinct. But it's all still currently privatized voting and we need to end that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. Yes, you know what I meant. Touchscreen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. OpScan is NOT software-dependent. We can get a statistically significant audit of the paper.

Nothing is perfect, but we can NOT go into another federal election with these damn touchscreens anywhere.

No matter what happens Tuesday, the work begins Nov. 5


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. I'm sorry, but you are flatly wrong
The optical scan systems do rely upon sofware, specifically firmware which is require to be compliant to certification procedures. On top of that there is the ballot programming software which knows what to do with the scan results. Every block equates to a race and a candidate, and the ballot code (not certified) knows just what to do with that.

For an example of where ballot programming went bad, see this map http://www.votersunite.org/info/mapVoteSwitch.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I'm sorry but YOU are flatly wrong. Opscan can be counted BY HUMAN EYE, touchscreen cannot.
Edited on Mon Nov-03-08 03:25 PM by demodonkey

Because it CAN be hand counted -- and hand audited -- the results on optical scan are not software dependent.

DRE absolutely MUST be counted by software, there is no other way.

How about we all go out now and work on the election, K?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. I vote by absentee ballot
because I have a medical condition that prevents me from standing up for long periods. That's one solution, but even that has problems.....for instance, here in my county, it costs over $1 in postage to mail it back. I don't mind paying the postage but that could be considered a poll tax as well, especially for older people on a fixed income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Add more booths. People don't do that because that gets expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. National voting by mail. It's the only way. Oregon is all mail voting and it works.
That is the only way to make this fair to all cities and towns and counties. Nationalize and bipartisanize it into a mail-only system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nipper1959 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. The simple solution is
A standardized ballot, on paper. Fill in the ovals just like on standardized tests. Trash all touch screens. Adequately staff all polling places. If this were happening in a third world country the UN would be supervising the election. It is a fucking disgrace that people have to wait for hours to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yes... that's exactly what the solution is...
... just copy Canada's voting system, for example:

1) More polling places (way more)

2) PAPER ballots!

3) Same ballot format nationwide!!! (with different candidates, of course)




It's actually very simple! The US has to reform it's presidential polling system... not just a little, a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foolacious Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Yep, it's so easy and fast in Canada.
In our last national election, a few weeks ago, I stopped by our local polling place after work. There were two people ahead of me, so it took me a whole three minutes to get checked off on the voting roll, get my paper ballot, make my X, and put it in the box. By the way, the entire campaign lasted about 5 or 6 weeks.

(For the record, I voted in the US election by absentee ballot three weeks ago -- in Colorado, the state of most recent US residence, and a swing state!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. NVLB: No Voter Left Behind. The FEC needs to require states to revamp...
....and soon.

This administration "Obama" would be the first in a long time to be willing to proactively pressure these loser states to get their shit together, they can tie it to federal funding if they like.

It's long overdue and the only thing missing has bee the will to do it.

NYC_SKP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cameozalaznick Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Okay, here's the deal on long lines for early voting.
These machines have to be programmed to handle every precinct. And apparently it takes a while to program the machines. So, they can only program so many machines for early voting and then they bring out the rest on election day. There is apparently not enough time to reprogram all the machines between the end of early voting and election day.

Let's say that county X has 100 machines for the whole election. Let's say they have 20 precincts with 5 early voting sites. And they decide to put two machines in each early voting site. Then they can only deploy 10 machines for early voting. But on election day, they'll be able to deploy the other 90. But those 10 will not be used because they can't be re-programmed in time.

At least this is how my county elections administrator explained it. He's a Dem by the way, and I believe him.

It's not really some nefarious plot to keep people from voting. It's just money. The answer is to buy more machines, but a lot of counties are running deficits and can't afford more machines right now.

There will be lines on election day, but in most places it won't be like for early voting because each entity will have a higher complment of machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brooklyns_Finest Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Absentee Ballot
All registered voters should have absentee ballots with prepaid postage sent to their homes. Absentee ballots should not be mandatory, but giving people options is the best bet. Saturday AND Sunday voting would also help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hand out box lunches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaTideFan83 Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Great idea.
I could make a few if you're serious about organizing this. Who else wants to help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. There's a very simple one, actually
Paper ballots and ballot boxes. Go low tech. No machines to worry about. You can put ballot boxes in county court houses for early voting and just drop them in ballot boxes at various polling places for Election Day voting. Someone mentioned having polling duty in the same way we have jury duty, to help beef up the staff on election day. Hand count the ballots as boxes are switched out. You could have your results by the next day.

For those that would complain about the results from hand-counted paper ballots being too slow, getting all the votes to count should be much more important than getting the results in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaTideFan83 Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. The simpler, the better!
Double wide lines. Or even triple wide lines. Most sidewalks can handle that. Then the lines would be a lot shorter. Everyone would be happier with getting into vote in 1/2 or 1/3 the time. I'm in charge of logistics at work. Why make something hard, when there are simple solutions? I'll be glad when we're in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. That doesn't really solve anything, but thanks for the idea anyway. :^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. More booths, longer polling hours plus additional days, and make the official
Tuesday election day a federal holiday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
42. Mail voting,
a la Oregon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
45. Give out Nintendo DSes and PSPs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC