Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Security guard doesn't want Obama restributing her "wealth"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kattenstoet Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:46 PM
Original message
Security guard doesn't want Obama restributing her "wealth"
I know there've been plenty of these, but man could these people be more retarded?

CNN Video

I wish there were a way to impose a special tax on people who make below median salaries and yet are voting for McCain because they don't want to have their wealth redistributed. I mean, they're already expecting it, they're not going to vote for Obama in 2012 - let's take their wealth and use it to fix bridges or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. She has no wealth. It is concentrated with those who have losta of it.......
Like with John Sidney McCain III. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess she'll be sending back any increase in her tax refund then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. she'll send it to a millionaire
and make everything right, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Someone should call her and Joe the Plumber and all the rest of them on this.
Let's see if they'll put their "wealth" where their mouths are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwei924 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. She'd be on the receiving end of the wealth!!! Stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Sheds Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's sad, isn't it?
If Obama is elected and things get better for her, what will she do? Say that Obama kept her from doing even better? That poor thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. But we could pay off the national debt...
with her whole 8 bucks an hour! Selfish, selfish! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. See, she is wealthy.
Some security guards make $6 an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. A $10 hourly is NOT "wealth".
Edited on Mon Nov-03-08 01:53 PM by cottonseed
I can't believe people in this country still can't get it in their heads that we're talking about a 3% increase in the top marginal tax rate; basically a tick up on anything over $250k. Even at that, people get revenue and taxable income mixed up. When this tax really kicks in, you're talking about a million dollars in reportable yearly income, and no security guard may make that in their entire lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipfilter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. She's just waiting for some of that wealth to trickle down to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. These people... it's like going to a British pub and ordering food.
When they see "chips" on the menu, they say they don't want chips, they want fries.

So you tell them that if they order chips, they'll actually get fries.

But they don't believe it, or they get confused, or they just don't hear.

For God's sake, Idiot America -- Obama will not redistribute your wealth! He will give you fries!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. will they be Freedom Fries? Or Communist Chips? Just askin' ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. They could be Chex Marx.
You know, with the nuts and wealthstershire sauce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Can I
have those fries supersized?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. In America, you can Super-size fries.
In Soviet Russia, fries Super-size you.

Erm, well they actually Super-size you here, too. Guess my joke got off-track there.

Carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. These aren't "low information voters", these are "fact-resistant voters".
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomper Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. what a dummy
and ugly looking too. McCain can have her.


:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. To these people, "redistribution of wealth" is code
Edited on Mon Nov-03-08 02:02 PM by JohnnyRingo
I's code for taking the hard earned wages of working people, and handing it out to those on welfare who "don't want to work".

It's usually centered around a racial theme, and decades ago the supply siders used the old "black guy in a Cadillac" to personify the image of someone who is on the receiving end of "redistribution", and rally the middle class around their cause.

Alternately, they use the welfare mother who keeps having kids to "get a bigger check".

Most of these Barstool Republicans don't realize that they are only two paychecks away from welfare themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. You are exactly right
Most of these Barstool Republicans don't realize that they are only two paychecks away from welfare themselves.

Here in Australia, which is a borderline socialist country, the newscasters and people on the street are BAFFLED by this American resistance to wealth redistribution. The comment I keep hearing is "why is it usually the people who can't pay their mortgages and are practically out on the streets themselves who are complaining about wealth redistribution??"

It's so clear to the whole world that these folks have no idea what they are talking about, but when you look at it from the racial component, it makes all the sense in the world. These "Barstool Repubs" as you call them have convinced themselves that "socialism" means taking money from the mouths of "hard-working" whites and putting it in the hands of shiftless, lazy blacks. And what's truly fascinating about this argument is 1) the U.S. has already been redistributing wealth through income taxes for about 80 years and 2) Obama ain't no socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. SO SAD FOR AMERICA
LOW INFORMATION VOTER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. she's dumb as hell ...cnn should be ashamed to run a story like this here's the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Earth to Security Guard: You have no wealth to redistribute.
What the hell is wrong with these people!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryEllen9399 Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. they think they are rich because they have SUVs
and all the latest hi-tech gadgets even though its all been bought on credit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. Is CNN still spreading stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Does this even make sense to anybody?
wtf is she talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:36 PM
Original message
There is. She can opt out of the "socialist" earned income credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. please don't use "retarded" as a slur
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Oh no, another attack of the "word police".
Don't care. Been using words as I see fit for many years, and I don't need people like you telling me what I can and can't say. I don't care what your "special situation" might be either. If your involved with a special needs person in some capacity you may wish to stop reading posts here, or you have the option to place me on ignore. If I chose to describe someone as relatively slow in mental or emotional or physical development, then I will use the word that fits the damn DEFINITION!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. Wake up, America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. It's deliberate ignorance
really, what else can it be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Unbelievable! She IS the working poor. It's sociological phenomenon that
people need to believe they are economically superior to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. See post #28. "Retarded" does NOT mean stupid.
Using it in such a context is offensive to anyone who has a loved one with mental retardation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. Tell her to go to taxcut.barackobama.com and figure out her Obama tax cut!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC