Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should we ignore exit polls?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 10:53 AM
Original message
Poll question: Should we ignore exit polls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bagrman Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. In every country besides America they are used to verify the validity of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. heh
The media doesn't ignore the exit-polls. Hell, they paid something like $10M for the polls in 2004. Prob $12M this time.

Basically we are being set up by certain people to distrust the exit polls. People! Wake up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schulzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nobody should start to celebrate because of them.
The primaries proved that are not very reliable. They are certainly interesting, but we will get real results soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. if we see strong leads in PA, VA and FL...
im celebrating, dammit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Media should boycott discussing exit polls until 10-11pm
Discussing turn out and such is fine.

I also think we need to make this a damn national holiday or change voting to a weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Funny how they were amazingly accurate up until about 2000 or so
When these filthy pieces of shit started taking over....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abugface Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. IGNORE EXIT POLLS !!!

They are notoriously inaccurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Or you could even say...
...ignore newbies, they are historically inaccurate. But I wouldn't.

Point is your claim of inaccuracy is inaccurate.

Fact is: Exit-polls are more accurate than the vote flipping machines. At least you can double-check the exit-polls, I have. Not so the machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Look at DEMOGRAPHIC POLLS.
Not the raw numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, I want it not to see who is ahead but to compare it to vote totals
Edited on Tue Nov-04-08 11:04 AM by Overseas
like we do in other countries to double check election integrity.

That's what I want my exit polling for. Not "who's leading this hour?" but -- are the vote counts accurate? Tracking with exit polling, as we expect when judging the fairness of other countries' elections.

In 2004, the exit polling by Mitovsky (I think that was the firm) AGREED WITH VOTE COUNTS for hours and hours and later at night (11 pm?) were still in agreement at 51 Kerry to 48 Bush.

Then THE VOTE COUNT DIVERGED BY SIX POINTS ! Statistically highly improbable.
Kerry down three.
Bush up three.
Six points is a large discrepancy that would've been a red flag in other countries. Instead, we adjusted our exit poll data to match the vote totals generated by the Republican secret software using voting machines.

I remember election night 2004. If you weren't watching then, check out the documentary, now available for free "Stealing America: Vote by Vote" www.stealingamericathemovie.com

I AM GLAD THOUGH THAT THIS TIME IT LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE OVERWHELMING NUMBERS TO OVERCOME THE CHEATING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. We should not ignore them
But there has to be something between ignoring them and worshiping them. Exit polls like any other poll are subject to error, and in fact have a greater chance of sampling bias that phone polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC