cui bono
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:28 PM
Original message |
Rachel is missing the big picture. |
|
She keeps talking for the last couple days, about how Obama may have spent a lot of money just to lose by less in red states. But his and the DNC's efforts will spill into the congressional races so it's not wasted money. And maybe next time they'll go blue. I love her but her pessimism is wearing on me.
|
Honeycombe8
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It also helps with the popular vote count. AND helps with the other races in those states. nt |
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. She actually does look a bit disappointed that Obama is doing as well as he is |
|
"these are very early returns", etc.
|
azmouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. And also remember that Obama had plenty of money to spend |
|
to keep these races close. Yeah, she can wear on me too but I still like her.
|
psychobueller
(84 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I think I might be done with her! n/t |
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
But I'm going to have to hide your thread. I don't think I've ever hidden any of your threads before. But I must hide this one, and all other Rachel Downer threads... I'm not going to do this tonight... I'm not going to fight her battles tonight.
She's brilliant... that is all.
|
cui bono
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. That's okay. I just wanted to point out the bigger picture of the downticket races mostly. |
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. Couldn't do it sweetie! Just can't bring myself to hide your thread! |
|
I'll just ignore it...
:hi:
|
cui bono
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
As long as you don't put me on ignore.
:hug:
|
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
cui bono
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
Because I just have one more thing to say...
why did she change her hair??? :D
|
qazplm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
does have a little bit of the only happy when it rains disease :P
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Maybe she is only trying to be realistic for us! She is very smart, so she knows what pitfalls |
|
we could face. She is also brilliant so don't discount her just because she disagrees with you at this point. It will be fine...
|
Johonny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I agree with Howard Dean. The Dems must compete in every district in every race. With must be a national party. Many people in rural America haven't been given a chance to hear a truly democratic message in nearly 30 years.
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I wonder if she'll still be concerned tomorrow. |
madeline_con
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Maddow? Isn't she supposed to be a Democrat? n/t |
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
12. She see its quite clearly |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-04-08 07:49 PM by depakid
and is saying that it's a risk- but one with equally big rewards. If you win, you remake the Democratic party in those states in your own image.
Too many people here seem to want a simple cheerleader- rather than an honest analyst.
|
gblady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
shut up Rachael... you're glum mug is making me want to slap you! and I'm so non violent..usually... but am on tenderhooks tonite...
|
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
15. correct obama spread the battle front to spread the opponent |
|
it was a brilliant strategy and Maddow is looking like a rookie
|
cottonseed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I think she's one of those that don't know actually like being in power. |
|
Being flogged for so long, she might be a bit uncomfortable with being the party in power.
|
Tarheel_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I've been saying it for a couple of weeks. Initially, Rahcel's show was |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-04-08 07:48 PM by Tarheel_Dem
must see TV, but I'm watching her less & less. Except for her interview with Obama, I've just caught her here & there. I'm not quite sure what her goal is? Is this normal Rachel, or is she being told to try to be neutral? I flipped over last night, and she seemed ecstatic to be interviewing Pawlenty, so I think she's trying to be "fair" & "balanced".
:edited for grammar
|
moondust
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I noticed that last night. |
|
I was surprised she hasn't connected this to the 50-state strategy. Some places you may not win this time but you're making inroads and starting a foundation for the next time and the times after that.
|
Motown_Johnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
21. she disagrees with the 50 state strategy. I think she is wrong but she has a right to her opinion |
|
maybe she will see the light when she sees how it affects the popular vote totals
|
Awsi Dooger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message |
22. My dad doesn't know anything about the Rachel talk on sites like this |
|
But a few minutes ago he called me about the election. Not long after asking for my summary, he said, "That woman on MSNBC, she couldn't be more irritating. Every time she comes on, I change the channel."
I laughed like hell and told him that was the consensus on message boards. My dad said, "Well, you can tell them I'm with them."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |