EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 09:51 PM
Original message |
Faux just reported "No legal options, race not close enough." |
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No "Legal" options...what the hell does THAT mean? |
|
Are Republican housewives going to take to the streets banging saucepans until the army takes power?
(don't put it past them, y'know...)
|
Chulanowa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. It's not within a margin of error, and so can't be challenged in the courts |
|
The results are far too clear for any such election-by-lawyer.
|
Poiuyt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Such a blow out that they can't cheat, can't challenge. |
|
recounts won't change it. :rofl:
|
Jennicut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Sorry, a-holes, can't steal this one! |
EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. exactly. They had a judge on opining the possibilities. |
RiffRandell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Fuckwads Hume and Wallace looked all down and out. |
|
We just turned it on for a fucking laugh, then Rove came on and I couldn't even hear his lying bullshit anymore so we changed it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |