Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

That MISERABLE SOB Novack: No mandate for Obama, no lopsided Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:53 AM
Original message
That MISERABLE SOB Novack: No mandate for Obama, no lopsided Congress
No mandate for Obama, no lopsided Congress

November 4, 2008

ROBERT NOVAK novakevans@aol.com

WASHINGTON -- The national election Tuesday was not only historic for the election of the first African-American president in the nation's history but also for how little the avalanche of Democratic votes changed the political alignment in Congress.

The first Democratic Electoral College landslide in decades did not result in a tight race for control of Congress.

When Franklin D. Roosevelt won his second term for president in 1936, the defeated Republican candidate, Gov. Alf Landon of Kansas, won only two states, Maine and Vermont, and Democrats controlled both houses of Congress by wide margins.

But Obama's win was nothing like that. He may have opened the door to enactment of the long-deferred liberal agenda, but he neither received a broad mandate from the public nor the needed large congressional majorities.

The Democrats fell several votes short of the 60-vote filibuster-proof Senate that they were seeking and also failed to get rid of a key Senate target: Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.
-snip-

http://www.suntimes.com/news/novak/1260688,CST-NWS-novak05.article

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think there's a mandate for his brain tumor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Doesn't he have a brain tumor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Novak has a brain?
Could have fooled me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Shit, I thought he was dead....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ummm...NOVAK?? SHUT THE FUCK UP!
you don't want to draw attention to yourself lest you find yourself in a windowless room being "questioned" by security agents with enhanced interrogation techniques in an effort to root out the answers to the Plame affair that were never answered.

DOUCHE BAG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. So the Douchebag of Liberty doesn't see a mandate?
I'm not too bothered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. He came out of retirement to write this hosrshit?
Once a Douchebag of Liberty, always a Douchebag of Liberty.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. This traitor will be proven wrong in short order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. And what did Novak call a "mandate" in 2004?
what little margin Bush "won" by was supplied by rigged machines in Ohio!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. Go easy on him. He's got brain cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
road2000 Donating Member (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Yes. But it's not that.
It's the fact he's lived as a traitor, and will die as a traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Yes that too, but I consider the fucker to be irrelevant now.
They're probably just humoring him by letting him write a column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. No mandate? Is he looking at the same electoral numbers as everyone else?
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 03:10 AM by Union Thug
What a hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Funny, but when the Repubs had a 2-EV win in 2000
and only the House... they somehow had a mandate.

Hmph. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. Well, Bob .. Junior Bush became president with fewer votes than his opponent...
...and chose to govern as if he'd accomplished a 50 state sweep. You'll forgive me if we ignore your sage advice, and ask our nation's new DemocratIC President and it's expanded, DemocratIC majority to start instituting change.

Claim a mandate? Yes, We Can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. Fuck you Novak...
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 03:18 AM by Puzzler
... Bush squeaks by with the tiniest of margins (in 2000 he had less votes than Gore)... and yet Bush had the "mandate" to fuck not only the US up, but also most of the world. However, Obama wins by a large margin, OK even a landslide... and that is somehow NOT a mandate. The sheer gall of Novak! (and doubtless some of his fascist buddies that will echo his sentiments tomorrow)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm pretty sure Novak- the unscrupulous, believed that razor thin margin that Bu$h fancied he had,
gave Bu$h a mandate in 2004, but hark, I forget, everything is different if you're a republican. Oh, and can someone explain why Novak, Delay and Rove are given any legitimacy, by given air time, and why they're not in jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. Screw Novak
I couldn't care less what he might have to say.
He's grave filler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
20. Right
but Bush had a mandate in 2004? Puhleez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
22. He can choke on THIS mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. yet they feel a president losing the popular and "winning" the electoral is a call to action
only Republicans could be so stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
24. Eat this, Bob
So far, Obama has beaten Johnny McSame by six million individual votes and 175 Electoral Votes.

Define mandate, you washed up old hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
25. Rubbish.
A landslide is a mandate.

Spin harder. QQ more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
26. What's the big surprise? The ReichWingers are going to spend the next two months
doing all they can to try to spin our win away.

We can't let them.

We have to stand up, over and over again, and defend what we've done tonight, against all attackers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. It should be remembered...
...that, when he was 50% of "Evans & Novak," their nickname around Washington was "Errors & NoFacts." Looks like the same old Bob.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC