berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:36 AM
Original message |
SCUMBAG ON FOX Says "Is it being overlooked that Obama won because he was better looking?" |
|
Questions that isn't it true that history shows the better looking guy on T.V. wins.
They can neither comprehend nor recognize the importance of this historical event.
RWers are indeed unbelievable stupid and selfish.
|
GinaMaria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Are they overlooking that Obama won because he was the better candidate? |
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
2. They've got to start the de-legitimization process right away..... |
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
HOW THE HELL CAN YOU WATCH THAT CRAP SO EARLY IN THE MORNING?
Doesn't it corrode your brain?
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Original message |
lol, I was watching the sad frownie faces with a surprising amount of enjoyment. |
|
Then they had to cheer themselves up with this bullshit and rightly piss me off.
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message |
15. I think I locked out Faux and can't remember the code. |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message |
4. No, the truth is that he won cuz it's the TALLER guy that always wins! |
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
abbiehoff
(356 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Yeah, but he is better looking though |
|
and better everything else, too.
|
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message |
6. These are the same people who were overwhelmed by Palin's "hotness" |
Blue For You
(466 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Fox is so ugly, I don't watch it. n/t |
Rosa Luxemburg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I guess Fox has to find something! |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Being tall and good looking DOES help. We vote for the taller candidate every time... |
|
and that includes '00 and '04, by the way.
We're lucky the taller, better-looking candidate is the better candidate.
But, yes, his looks helped. If he looked and talked like Charlie Rangel, he might not be where he is today.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message |
sunder
(63 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
12. They are pathetic n/t |
Bad Thoughts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Was it a blonde airhead in a short skirt who asked? |
|
Perhaps looks are everything.
|
BleedingHeartRN
(226 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
14. They are so fucking stupid |
|
I admittedly watched it a little while early this morning, but really couldn't take it for long because they started talking about how the MSM needed to stop being so hard on Bush and allow his legacy to recover. I don't see how anyone with even half a brain can watch that horseshit.
|
TheCowsCameHome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Then why did the (R)'s run Palin? |
|
Wasn't she run partially for shock value?
|
dipsydoodle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message |
17. The "skinny kid with the funny name" |
|
has made then all look complete dickheads. I am oh sooooooooo pleased for him and Joe and all of you.
|
Arkansas Granny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message |
18. They have to interpret this victory in superficial terms or their viewers might |
|
begin to take Obama seriously. They can't let that happen.
|
Best_man23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |
19. If better looking was the criteria |
|
Why didn't the McCain/MILF ticket get more votes?
|
BREMPRO
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message |
20. goes with the superficial nature of their political thought, They picked Palin because she was hot |
|
that didn't work out so well. (Even with the Wasilla Hillbilly shopping spree to dress her up)
Obama's more popular policies not withstanding, i think it was more his steady confident temperament and personality than gave him an edge more than "looks". McCain always seemed uneasy, erratic, angry. That's ugly.
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message |
21. although I should be disgusted by that comment it is a valid point |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Come on guys, there's a LITTLE bit of truth to that.... |
|
... it's not the ONLY reason, but it helped!
|
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message |
23. They're the ones who picked McCain over Mittens. |
|
They're absolutely pathetic.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message |
24. You know what? Here's what matters: "W". As in "WIN". Bwahahahahaha!! |
stuntcat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message |
25. just like how Gore won because he was better looking |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message |