Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SCUMBAG ON FOX Says "Is it being overlooked that Obama won because he was better looking?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:36 AM
Original message
SCUMBAG ON FOX Says "Is it being overlooked that Obama won because he was better looking?"
Questions that isn't it true that history shows the better looking guy on T.V. wins.

They can neither comprehend nor recognize the importance of this historical event.

RWers are indeed unbelievable stupid and selfish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Are they overlooking that Obama won because he was the better candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. They've got to start the de-legitimization process right away.....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. a serious question.
HOW THE HELL CAN YOU WATCH THAT CRAP SO EARLY IN THE MORNING?

Doesn't it corrode your brain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Original message
lol, I was watching the sad frownie faces with a surprising amount of enjoyment.
Then they had to cheer themselves up with this bullshit and rightly piss me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. I think I locked out Faux and can't remember the code.
Oh, yes, 666. Figures.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, the truth is that he won cuz it's the TALLER guy that always wins!
:sarcasm: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Like Gore! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abbiehoff Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, but he is better looking though
and better everything else, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. These are the same people who were overwhelmed by Palin's "hotness"
'nuf said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue For You Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fox is so ugly, I don't watch it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. I guess Fox has to find something!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. Being tall and good looking DOES help. We vote for the taller candidate every time...
and that includes '00 and '04, by the way.

We're lucky the taller, better-looking candidate is the better candidate.

But, yes, his looks helped. If he looked and talked like Charlie Rangel, he might not be where he is today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. FOX is irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunder Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. They are pathetic n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. Was it a blonde airhead in a short skirt who asked?
Perhaps looks are everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartRN Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. They are so fucking stupid
I admittedly watched it a little while early this morning, but really couldn't take it for long because they started talking about how the MSM needed to stop being so hard on Bush and allow his legacy to recover. I don't see how anyone with even half a brain can watch that horseshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. Then why did the (R)'s run Palin?
Wasn't she run partially for shock value?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. The "skinny kid with the funny name"
has made then all look complete dickheads. I am oh sooooooooo pleased for him and Joe and all of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. They have to interpret this victory in superficial terms or their viewers might
begin to take Obama seriously. They can't let that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Best_man23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. If better looking was the criteria
Why didn't the McCain/MILF ticket get more votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. goes with the superficial nature of their political thought, They picked Palin because she was hot
that didn't work out so well. (Even with the Wasilla Hillbilly shopping spree to dress her up)

Obama's more popular policies not withstanding, i think it was more his steady confident temperament and personality than gave him an edge more than "looks". McCain always seemed uneasy, erratic, angry. That's ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
21. although I should be disgusted by that comment it is a valid point
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
22. Come on guys, there's a LITTLE bit of truth to that....
... it's not the ONLY reason, but it helped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. They're the ones who picked McCain over Mittens.
They're absolutely pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. You know what? Here's what matters: "W". As in "WIN". Bwahahahahaha!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
25. just like how Gore won because he was better looking
oh wait..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC