|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 11:57 AM Original message |
Memes that need to be put to rest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. Experts have the goods on the fraud. Like it or lump it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. If you mean anecdotal goods, sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Staistics make first-class circumstantial evidecne - and that... is how fraud is proved in court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Lies, damned lies, statistics... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I don't know how you have the nerve to show your face on here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 07:10 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I'm sorry, you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 08:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. You've never heard of "probable cause"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenEyedLefty (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. "We're not ready for a black president." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. You know what? I'm guilty as charged on that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. The biggest one to bury is the "Liberals hate Palin because they're afraid of strong women" bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'll add some to the pile. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. Old meme: fuck Nader. New meme: Nader's irrelevant (but he's a twit with a microphone, sadly). nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeadElephant_ORG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. "He just can't 'seal the deal.'" and "He doesn't 'connect' with ordinary Americans." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. Glad Obama proved the "he can't win" charge wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
14. BULLSHIT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
16. Enough turnout to override fraud doesn't mean we should ignore fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
17. Cons do not spend only to keep the nation running. They spend to get re-elected. Dems do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 08:24 AM Response to Original message |
18. how stupid to ignore becase we won. we KNOW it was stolen. that votes were STOLEN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
19. Elections in 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008 were all stolen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC