Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not to harsh anyone's buzz... but take a look at Alaska.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:38 PM
Original message
Not to harsh anyone's buzz... but take a look at Alaska.
It would appear Alaskans have re-elected Ted Stevens, Senator Felon.

Couldn't Governor Palin appoint herself to that seat? And if she wants to make a run in 2012, wouldn't it be smart to get the hell out of Alaska and move to "Acela" so she can stay in the national spotlight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, she could. Her ambition knows no bounds...
She'll get to DC, one way or another.:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. NO she cannot
Alaska will have to hold a special election. That's their law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. WHEW! And thank you for the info!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't believe she can appoint herself.
However, I will be surprised if she doesn't run for the seat when it comes up again in 2014, or sooner if they have some kind of special election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Could she resign and have her Lieutenant apppoint her? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Alaska doesn't do gubernatorial appointments since the Murkowski debacle.
They do special elections now, like you would for a House seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. OH THANK GAWD
But... I thought it was a Constitutional issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I believe you MUST have a special election for a House seat and you MAY have one for a Senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. 7th Amendment:
"The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years. . .

When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct."

I'm afraid I still don't understand for certain how this would work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, then I vote for Alaska to take her morons and secede. Good riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. No Palin can't appoint a replacement.
Alaska has dealt with bad appointments in its past and doesn't do them anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. I know this is some heartbreaking crap - also if Franken loses
I just hope that there is a special election held quickly in Alaska, and that Begich runs and wins it. We need those Senate seats bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. This, Franken and most of all Prop 8 here in CA has tempered my joy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. And the odious Bachmann creature's being re-elected. I'd boycott her
district to pay them back if I would ever wind up near the hell hole, which I doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HelenWheels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not surprised
I felt right from the start Felon Stevens would win. He brings too much pork to Alaska for them to throw him out. And you can bet the Senate will not dump him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. The bright side is
Senator ted felon stevens is a reminder of what corruption is and the rest of us will be ever vigiliant.

Traitor joe and he can go sit in a Senate corner.

Congratulations on OHIO, JEN! :toast::bounce::party::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Wasn't OHIO the best!???!???
Yes, yes, all credit to all the formerly red states.. FL, VA, CO, NM, INDIANA!!!!!

But when they called OHIO for OBAMA was the moment we all knew we had won, wasn't it????

:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ted's ahead by 3533 votes
and there are absentee ballots yet to be counted.

But yes, it would seem Stevens is going to be re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Mark Begich may pull this out yet.
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 12:54 PM by Blue_In_AK
Only 4,000 votes separate him from Ted Stevens and according to this morning's paper there are at least 50,000 ballots left to count. We probably won't know for a couple of weeks how this shakes out.

Of course the Republicans are gaming us because I think they know in their hearts that Ted's going down -- and at 84, there's not even a guarantee that he'll live another six years. It's going to be kind of interesting to watch the factions, as well, because Sarah DID ask Ted to step down and he refused, so there's probably some tension there. There's been a battle brewing here between the Palinistas and the Old Guard, so it could get really entertaining in the coming months.


As for Ted Stevens, yes, he's a grumpy old bastard and, yes, he's brought an excessive amount of pork to Alaska, but he has been very responsive to individual regular constituents, as well, over the years. I suspect that there are very few people here who haven't been helped at one time or another by Ted or his office -- myself included. He interceded for me with HUD in DC after I was sold a HUD house with a bad roof, and I've heard many other stories of individuals who he's helped. He was an effective senator for Alaska for many years, and I think a lot of folks are suffering from separation anxiety and especially are having trouble coming to grips with the fact that he has committed crimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Thank you for the Alaska Update!
So... if Ted pulls this out, didn't Harry Reid already say he'll be booted from the US Senate? Not at all sure how that works.

What's the word up there... can Palin appoint herself, or do you have a special election?

The 7th Amendment to the US Constitution says:

"The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years. . .

When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct."

So what happens, Alaska????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. What happens is that we have to have a special election
within 90 days of a vacancy, although the governor can make an interim appointment if she chooses to. I don't think it would look too good if Sarah appointed herself as the interim senator -- but she's pretty ballsy, so who knows.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
43. Although Gov. Palin appointing herself would solve
certain problems. Especially if she lost a bid for the Senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I am sorry Blue, you have to have Sarah and Todd back.
Good luck with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Reid already told him he can't serve, but that means you-know-who appoints his successor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. We have a special election.
Any appointment would only be for the interim, maximum 90 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. good to know
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Interesting!!
So... she could still appoint herself, though? And then run in the special election?

Is anyone in Alaska talking about this or am I just being weird here? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. No, you're not being weird.
We're ALL talking about it. I'm anticipating a bit of a battle between the Palinistas and the old-time Republicans over who will run for this seat when Ted steps down, as he no doubt will have to eventually. The Republicans are definitely factionalized at this point. A lot of the old-timers think she's a socialist (really) because of the energy rebate and the increased tax that she put on the oil companies. And now I'm sure there's going to be some discomfort over all the right-wing religious stuff that came out during the campaign ... Sarah had kept that all pretty much under wraps during her governorship, so I'm wondering if she'll really try to pull out all the stops now. If she does, she'll be in trouble, because we're not particularly religious up here. In fact, I read a survey a while ago that Alaska has the least number of church-goers per capita of any state in the union.

Anyway, it should be an interesting few months coming up. I'm sorry the Democrats couldn't do better up here, but at least we've got Obama, and that makes as alL VERY happy. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. We should support the AIP
And encourage secession.

I will miss the wonderful National Parks, but we must make sacrifices for the good of the country! :patriot:

(NOTHING CAN HARSH MY BUZZ! THANK YOU FOR DELIVERING OHIO!!!) :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. We DID IT!
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 12:58 PM by VolcanoJen
Hi baby!!!

:loveya:

So, when they called Ohio for OBAMA, did you feel it out there? Wasn't that the moment!?? We worked SO HARD here and not only did we turn Ohio back to its rightful blue color, we did it BIG. We are DEEP BLUE, darlin'!!!!

And Obama even won Hamilton County (Cincinnati). First time that's happened for a Dem since LBJ!

I do have to add that my buzz is indeed harshed by that Prop 8 nonsense, though. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. We cheered loudly when Ohio was called for Obama.
That was when we all started breathing a little easier. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. It was the first major catharsis of the evening
I whooped when PA was called. But with Ohio, it started to become VERY REAL, and the floodgates opened. Tears just flowed. I didn't know if I was laughing or crying, it was so sudden and strong. We all knew the electoral math denied Republican victory without Ohio!

And then that was topped by the official passing of 270 votes. Ohio, however, was a very special moment of the evening. Never to be forgotten. :-)


As for Prop 8, I am willing to help the ACLU and others - at the first chance we get - take it to the U.S. Supreme Court (with its new Obama appointees)if in any way possible. I believe a serious 14th amendment case can be made concerning equal protection under the law. Barring that, then there is ALWAYS the chance of getting a new proposition on the ballot next year and repealing it. Ever so surely, civil rights are a struggle with which we can never let down our guard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I popped the cork on my champagne when Ohio was called
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 01:21 PM by VolcanoJen
Moet & Chandon White Star, by the way. FRENCH!!!

In 2004, that bottle sat in my fridge for six months until I finally just decided to drink the damned thing. And last night, I was going to wait until 11:00, but I just couldn't. I knew it was over when Ohio was called, because as big as Pennsylvania was, Ohio was the first red-state-poach of the night, and she brought with her 20 Electoral Votes. :-)

I have never felt this good, Zomby!!! Almost eight years now we've been slogging away together at DU and last night, we finally got to pop the cork.

:hug: Zomby :hug:

You of course know we are ALL behind California's efforts to fight Prop 8. We are energized and motivated and awash with the gorgeous scent of hope. Yes, We Can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. That is the SAME CHAMPAGNE WE HAD!!
:rofl:

It had been sitting in the fridge most of the year - and did I dare HOPE that the election would be our chance to pop the cork? YES, I DID! :D

We did wait until 270, however, if only because that unbelievable moment seemed like it would never come! :hug: JenJen! :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. How awesome is that!
French Champagne, White Star, for Two of the Original DU OG's!!!!!!!!

:loveya: Zomby! :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. The problem is Obama at least in his 1st term
is unlikely to have any impact on the Supreme Court other than to maintain the balance we have now.

Bush has stacked the court with a bunch of middle aged ideologues and they will continue to be a problem over a long time.
Technically, he could add more justices because I don't think the Constitution sets a hard cap on the Court but doing so would open up a Pandora's box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. We'll likely fight it in the state courts again
And then the ballot box. But it's a fight that did NOT end last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogpatch Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. yeah Prop 8 shat on my buzz
what a way to twist the knife in our backs in this otherwise incredible and joyous moment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. At what point would his convictions kick his ass outta office?
I know, it's all under appeal at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Alaska's Republicans are very stubborn.
When he is evicted from the Senate, we'll HAVE to have a special election. It's kind of in Harry Reid's court at the moment, or we'll have to wait for appeal results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
37. No felons in Senate
Stevens, a freshly minted felon, cannot remain a senator even if he’s re-elected. There will be a big hole on the senate roster until they have a special election to replace Stevens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
41. They're beyond help if they elect people like Stevens & Palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Don't write us all off.
The progressives here shine twice as brightly by comparison, even though we're in the minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
42. We were discussing this at lunch today. How strange is it that a convicted felon
cannot vote, but can be elected to office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC