maseman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:56 PM
Original message |
Do you think Palin hurth the female's chance to reach high office? |
|
Obviously not forever or anything. But I think the Republican's choice to put Palin on the ticket actually hurth the chances for a female President for quite sometime. She was just awful.
|
BklynChick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I certainly don't think she helped |
GodlessBiker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Holy hell no. Not even in the Republican Party. It will hurt the chances of unqualified nutjobs |
justiceischeap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Naw, I think most people are smart enough to know and see what her pick was all about |
|
She was chosen as a token and many people, especially women, said, "Hell no!" If you're going to give us a woman, give us a smart woman. Then on the other side of the coin, the wingnuts loved her 'cause she was dumb just like them. If it hurt women on the Presidential level of politics, I think it did more harm to Repugs than Dems.
|
phleshdef
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I disagree. There is no way she undid Hillary's work. |
LiberteToujours
(737 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Maybe if Hillary hadn't preceded her and shown everyone that a woman could do it just as well as a man, Sarah could have done more damage. But since Hillary was there, I think most people just perceive Sarah Palin to be exceptionally unqualified as an individual, but not as a reflection on women in general.
|
livetohike
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
7. No. She was found to be unqualified by 60% of the voters. |
|
People know when they see a qualified woman who is a candidate for President. She didn't hurt a qualified woman from seeking/attaining the office.
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
8. No, she only hurt Republican chances |
|
Incompetent and unqualified are not limited to females. But females aren't immune from that either (Phailin being living proof)
|
tazkcmo
(668 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:59 PM
Original message |
susanna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
9. You may have just answered your own question. |
|
"She was just awful." :-)
I would have had no problem with an intelligent, accomplished woman being nominated. Palin was an utter insult to intelligent, accomplished women everywhere. Big backfire for the Republicans this year, but I do not think it will cost women high offices in the future.
|
nini
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message |
10. No, but ignornat dumbass winking fools are out moving forward |
Burma Jones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Nope.....I think people are whispering in Kay Bailey Hutchison's ear even now....... |
meow2u3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Palin is a token woman |
|
If there were a real woman running instead of a mere token, we might have a female President or Vice-President.
|
demmiblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
13. She stood on the shoulders of fools, our dem women stand on the shoulders of giants! |
demmiblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
18. p.s. thank you Eleanor! |
rvablue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Not one bit. She hurt the chances of cheap political stunt picks not to reach high office. |
frogmarch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
15. No. Palin doesn't personify all women. |
paparush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Hell No. She will make a qualified, experienced woman shine like a diamond. |
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
17. No more than Dan Quayle hurt a males chance. nt |
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Yup, she gave women a bad rap...bad name...she shouldn't have been chosen |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
20. No, she hurt herself and i totally believe she lost votes for McCain. Palin reps only herself |
bitchkitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
21. No - the next qualified female who runs |
|
can only be compared favorably to that ditz. The contrast will be in her (not Palin's) favor.
|
Sewsojm
(554 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Only if they happen to be from Alaska. |
avaistheone1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
woodsprite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
23. I don't think she hurt any competent female's chance. |
|
Of course, the key word there is competent - not female - like some thought was the most important word during this election.
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
alsame
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Hillary was the role model in this election cycle, Palin was a bad joke. |
kwolf68
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think she hurt Dummies chances of reaching high office (George Dumbya notwithstanding)
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message |
whistler162
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Did Alan Keyes or Jesse Jackson hurt |
|
President Elect Obama's chances at being elected?
No.
So the answer is no.
|
SheWhoMustBeObeyed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
She only hurt one. Herself.
|
yardwork
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message |
31. No. I don't think it will make a difference among Democrats. |
|
I don't care what the Republicans do. I hope they're out of power forever.
|
NV Whino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Anybody looks good after Palin.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |