Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHO should be in President Obama's Cabinet? Powell at Defense (not State, because he

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:14 AM
Original message
WHO should be in President Obama's Cabinet? Powell at Defense (not State, because he
lied to the UN for Dubya)?

Here's my Dream Team. What's yours?

WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?

Treasury: Timothy Geithner, NY Fed Preisdent
Defense: Colin Powell
State: Bill Richardson

National Security: Samantha Power
Homeland Security: Richard Clarke
Attorney General: Eric Holder

Energy: Jeff Bingaman
Education: George Miller
Commerce: Olympia Snowe

HHS: Julie Gerberding
HUD: Shirley Franklin
Labor: Dick Gephardt

VA: Tammy Duckworth
Interior: Christine Gregoire
UN: Caroline Kennedy

EPA: Lincoln Chafee
Council of Economic Advisers: David Cutler

See also http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-nickolas/what-might-a-president-ob_b_130747.html for a comprehensive list of multiple top candidates for each position.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good list. I also like Kerry for State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. all these fine choices.. Do we think who will replace them.?
Example.. Gov. Napolitano of Az.. She resigns the governorship, will the new governor be a Republican .?... We want Democrats to be in certain positions.. Remember, congressional re-districting is only a couple years away.. Kerry goes to State. Massachusetts might unfortunately, soon have two new U.S. Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. "Who will replace them"? That's why Holder is my AG pick, not Napolitano. I
I picked some sitting Congresspeople, along with Gov Gregoire of Washington, with that precise consideration in mind.

Olympia Snowe of Maine well might be replaced by a Democrat, like Shaheen who was elected this week. At worst, a special election for her seat might result in a Republican without her seniority. At best, Democrats get one seat closer to guaranteed cloture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. I like Bill Richardson for State
he has a good bit of experience working with other nations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Plus he's been vetted in the primaries and hasn't the political baggage of a Kerry or
other more well-known figure. And with his experience, he's "ready on Day One".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Excellent choice. Just wish he was VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Powell said last night he's still a Repuke..
So, some moderate Republicans can be ... moderates.. I think.. Powell , might as well say his good bye's. They will never forgive him... He did lie at the UN at Bush's insistence... But, then Moore welcomed Powell and said redemption can be a Democratic thing.. I'd think after Rummy's poor treatment of Powell, he'd love to sit in Rummy's old chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. There's no question he'd have the respect of ust about every officer, lobbyist, and contractor
Plus, he's a bipartisan" pick. I'll never forget that one of his first recommendations as Dubya's Secy of State was to wind down the "no Fly Zone" and embargo of Iraq. Just think how many hudreds of thousands of lives would be different--and would still exist--today if Dubya had listened to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Brian Schweitzer: Sec. Of Energy (or Agriculture).
Energy would be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I agree--he'd be GREAT at Energy. But see post #3. Bingaman knows how to get
legislation through Congress and has many colleagues there anxious to help him--that's why I picked him instead of Schweitzer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Whoever Obama wants
I trust his judgement so far, so let him pick whoever he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. What fun would that be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Powell should fade away.
What the hell,he lied us into war,let's let him run the Pentagon as consolation prize.Jesus H.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Defense is at the heart of the GOP money machine. Powell would not rile them unnecessarily,
and is virtually unassailable in their eyes. Yet Powell's instincts are spot-on (see post #4 above), and of the available strong "bipartisan" candidates, Powell is most likely to be in sync with what President Obama wants to do at Defense.

No candidate is perfect in everybody's eyes. Possible Defense Secretaries who would be "ready on day one" are few. Whom would you put at Defense instead of Powell?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Powell should be in prison along with Bush,Cheney,Rumsfeld...
But you want to make him Defense Secretary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. You are right, Powell is a murderer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. You didn't answer my Q: Who'd be better at quietly bringing change to the bloated
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 02:02 PM by ProgressiveEconomist
DOD than Colin Powell?

Who else would be so well accepted by the Rs while applying a sharp scalpel to the huge DOD budget, mission creep, and abuse of the National Guard and Reserve?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. Right again - batting a thousand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. Exactly right. The guy has zero credibility with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Eric Holder: A President has to TRUST his AG more than he has to trust any other Cabinet officer
Holder already is a senior legal adviser to Obama, plus as a former Deputy AG he'd have no learning curve--"ready on Day One."

See http://www.theadvertiser.com/article/20081106/NEWS01/811060328/1002 .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. Julie Gerberding at HHS? WTF....?
Perhaps you should talk to some CDC folks before making that judgement... Good heavens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. What's wrong with Julie Gerberding? While Obama crafts his health insurance plan
at the WH, who would be a better spokesperson for any medical science issues that might arise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. She is widely detested at CDC (and not well respected at
her prevous institution UC-San Francisco.... She brought her Bush*-inspired crony circus to a much respected public health agency-- driving off the most talented scientists and administrators. The damage will require many years to repair.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Thanks. Didn't know CDC had been so politicized. What high-profile administrator
other than Gerberding would be unassailable on comprehensive knowledge of the latest medical science research?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Is that really necessary for HHS Secretary?
We are talking about an administrative position. I think Howard Dean would be a perfect choice for HHS. His medical background and executive experience would make him an excellent choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Will just any MD do when "CHANGE" in a "broken healthcare system" is on the agenda?
IMO, health insurance plans coming out of the WH from economists like David Cutler need sign-off from an experienced, well-known, nonpartisan, professionally unassailable medical scientist to survive flak from a threatened healthcare industry that will hire hundreds of experts to shoot Obama's plans down.

Could Howard Dean be that person? If not the HHS Secretary, who would be the person in the Cabinet Room to provide that essential point of view?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. Head of HHS is an administrative position..... should have
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 12:58 AM by hlthe2b
understanding of NIH and CDC and the research and programmatic needs of both, but needn't waste the talents of a hard core researcher in that position--i.e., someone of the stature of Tony Faucci (NIH) would be wasted as Secretary of HHS, rather than being left to head NIH.

Arguably there are many who are influential in both Public Health and basic core research, as well as grounded in the needs of health care reform... Donna Shalala,(HHS Secretary under Clinton) after all, was neither a Public Health all-star, a prominent medical researcher, nor a medical leader--specifically in health care reform, but she had some appreciation for all from her previous position as Chancellor of the University of Wisconsin and was effective as an administrator and in advocating--i.e., "bringing in the money."

HHS Secretary should be the strong political advocate for the policies and agendas of the major health agencies, (CDC, FDA, NIH), but the Directors of each should be the subject experts that the HHS secretary calls upon as issues arise. Arguably having a Bill Foege or David Satcher at CDC, a Tony Faucci at NIH, and a David Kessler at FDA is far more criticial than having someone of similar stature as Secretary of HHS... We need a good political advocate and administrator in this latter role. Having said that, there is little doubt that Howard Dean could fill that HHS role, as well as aid in health care reform if this were a position he wanted to have... My guess would be that someone like him would prefer to work from outside the confines of a Cabinet position on the health care issue, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. Newsweek is handicapping that it is Kerry at State and Gates continues at Defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Thanks for the link. Kind of hard to sell those 2 as "change we need", isn't it?
I also like their "Transition Home" link and "Handover Horror Stories" at http://www.newsweek.com/id/167691 .

It seems like Papa Bush's choice of John Tower in 1988-89 exemplifies the worst that could happen after a bad Defense Secretary appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Neither is Richardson,
who has been involved in the Clinton administration at several levels. Actually Kerry would be change we need, particularly after 8 years of Rice. He would give to the Middle East and Asia a face they know and who understand their problems.

Gates would be fine as a transition secDef, given that Obama is the one defining the policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. Your list is awful
Sec. of Defense should be a Democrat, period.

Dick Gephardt is a backstabber, and I don't want to see him anywhere near an Obama administration.

Why the hell are you mentioning Tammy Duckworth for VA? She doesn't have the experience to warrant a cabinet position.

Why would we want to lose a Democratic Governor for Sec. of the Interior?

Julie Gerberding has caused the CDC to collapse. Howard Dean would be a much better choice for HHS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
26. Powell is not being considered folks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. Shhhhh, Do Not Mention This Guy:
Wes Clark. Shhhhhh. Don't tell anybody. After all, what did he ever do?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damndude Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. RFK, Jr for AG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. CP is just as much of a war criminal as the rest
of the Bu$h Maladministration.
He kenw what he was saying at the UN was a lie and did not protest or resign. He is also a coward and don't forget My Lai!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. Republican Senators from states we can
almost immediately turn into Dem Senators (either by appointment or special election).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC