"Freedom March" : America was conned. Stop Obama.

[Oak2004]

http://www.freedommarch.org/Home_Page.html

Just in case you're wondering about this outfit's claims of being not a racist organization: I found it while surveying white supremacist sites for death threats against our President. Though, knowing the wall between them is rather thin, I figure the freepers will be all over this in short order, if they aren't already.

[PretzelWarrior]

1. what stupid fuckers. Americans got wall to wall coverage of Obama

and he beat their weak GOP candidate in a LANDSLIDE. Sounds like they aren't very patriotic if they want to undo the people's will.

[ROh70]

2. who are the socialist radicals behind Obama? Bill Ayers????

And . . .?

[Monk06]

3. according to whois their admin addy is the White House. How fucked in the head are they?

[Spider Jerusalem]

5. Site is going to disappear soon; just reported to InterNIC for bad whois info

See here for ICANN reqs on whois data accuracy: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/advisory-10may02.htm

And here to report inaccurate or fraudulent domain registration info:http://wdprs.internic.net/

[Oak2004]

6. Cool :)

Given the content of the site and the locations where I found it promoted, it couldn't have happened to a more deserving website.

[fasttense]

4. These people have absolutely no grasp of reality.

They complain and whine "Freedom March.org strongly believes that Barack Obama is at best a socialist, and at worst, a closet radical."

These numb skulls are worried about socialism, really? What about their beloved bush who has socialized the debt of the Wall Street billionaires by $700? They weren't screaming socialism is bad when the bush used it.

And they think Obama is a radical. The bush ignores the constitution and spies on American citizens without warrants. But that's not radical? The bush declared in a signing statement he would read our mail. But that's not radical? The bush fights daily against science, as if being stupid is a virtue. But that's not radical? The bush ignores the Geneva convention, a 59 year old treaty (parts of which are even older). But that's not radical? He encourages religious interference in our government, ignoring our founding father's mandate to keep church and state separate. But that's not radical?

Where were these sniveling cowards when bush introduced socialism and radically declared he would ignore the Constitution to which he swore an oath? I suspect they were hiding under their beds.