Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think it's time to collect signatures for a referendum to require Mormons to leave California

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:01 AM
Original message
I think it's time to collect signatures for a referendum to require Mormons to leave California

I mean, if civil rights are up for a majority vote, why not? Everybody will get to vote, and the majority will rule. But if the people say "leave", then they must pack their bags and leave California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chloroplast Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Blaming the Mormons? Good gawd.
You figure California is more than 50% Mormon?

Prop 8 pisses off Dems from coast to coast, but it represents a real F*** up by the opposition to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. 77 percent of the money to support prop 8 came from the Mormons
:shrug:
I think blaming the Mormons might be just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Those who opposed Prop 8 had their asses kicked by those who supported it.
Now, it's on the books and getting it off will be that much harder.

Blame the Mormons if you want, but a big coordinated effort is now necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gypsylud Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
33. What's your proof?
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 11:20 AM by gypsylud
was it from the church or from individuals. Please post link. I'm not being an ass, I just really want to know if this is true.

edit fer englesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. They're taking credit ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. The Mormons funded a huge portion of the anti-gay campaign
They came from SLC and put a slew of money into an amendment for the constitution of ANOTHER state. They targeted minority churches and immigrant areas, blanketing the state with their own special kind f hatred and bigotry.

Their hatred was SO intense that they felt the need to cross a couple state lines to spread it.

If Mormons as a group don't want to get blamed then perhaps they should impress their views on their church elders.

Yes the asking them to leave the state is silly and the poster I'm sure knows that.

But their anger at the Moromons is justified, right along side anger at the Catholic Church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
43. i dunno if its about blaming anybody , but
the OP has a point...

we should go crazy with outrageous votes to take away everybody elses rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. YES!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. how bout outlaw christian marriage, or even better, outlaw divorce like jesus says nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. I believe that people shouldn't be allowed to remarry after divorce. That's what the Bible
says.....




All these religious people who want to follow the Bible need to be consistent.

That also goes for anyone religious on DU who is against gay marriage!

Oh, and no sex outside of marriage please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'll volunteer to gather signatures for that
Seriously. I'll stand outside the tabernacle in W. LA and collect sigs from the passers by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe the petition should call for those who
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 10:15 AM by LibDemAlways
voted for this travesty to leave. I saw Pro 8 signs in my neighborhood on lawns of a lot of non-Mormons.

Though the Mormon church poured money into the Yes campaign, Catholic churches, and conservative evangelical type churches were vocal in their support as well.

This thing apparently passed because the homophobes in this state - of all religious stripes - still outnumber those who believe in equality and live and let live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Don't forget the extreme scare tactics
used in the "yes on 8' ads.

Lie, after BSing lie was spewed out to scare the voters
into passing it!

I know I'm repeating myself but DAMN!,

we've got to get 'truth in advertising' applicable
to campaigns and campaign ads.

:grr:

The voters deserve no less!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Absolutely! Let's exterminate all the Mormons, Catholics,
and all other evangelicals that do not agree with our way of thinking. After all, Hitler did it. We did it to Native Americans, why not others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chloroplast Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. But...but...they started it first!
Our hatred towards them is okay because they wanted to hate us first. *sigh* For some, having a group to blame is much easier that actually fighting to get a goal accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. They're Mormon by choice, and that threatens the sanctity of my religious beliefs.
just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. They are also an ethnic group
The Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups lists Mormons as an ethnicity.
Gale Encyclopedia of Multicultural America has an entry on "Mormon-Americans".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
31. LoL. Now THAT was a good one
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Here Is a Idea
If they want to make It Illegal for Gays to marry how about banning all Marrage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. I want another constitutional amendment
banning marriage among Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. Another Extermination Order?
In 1838 the governor of Missouri:
"...the Mormons must be treated as enemies, and must be exterminated or driven from the State if necessary for the public peace—their outrages are beyond all description."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. If the majority votes on it, why would anyone object?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Why indeed?
Didn't we pretty much exterminate most Native American tribes? As I recall there were over 700 various tribes when "Columbo" arrived. There are less than 100 now. We are good at exterminating folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. I live on stolen land.
So do you.

You either learn to accept the crimes of your forefathers or I suggest you move out of the country, because all this land is stained with lies and the blood of native peoples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. Anyone else you want to exterminate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Those who would exterminate me.
Civil rights aren't up for a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Ask a few Native Americans about extermination
Good God Some Dems are just plain damn stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
42. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetieD Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
45. Please no one wants to exterminate you. Don't create false equivalencies. Marraige rights are not
the same as slavery, genocide, expulsion or extermination. This line of argument makes me absoultely sick. People, including straight people, have never had an unequivocal right to get married to whoever they want.(i.e. laws against incestuous marraige, polygamy, polyandry etc.) That is why the marraige issue is trickier than other civil rights issues on constitutional grounds. Gay marraige will be a reality one day just not now. Do not give up hope. It took almost a 100 years from the end of slavery to the civil rights act. Time is on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Then you fucking wait 100 years to get married. Time is not on my side, thanks.
I love how preachy you fuckers get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Denial of these basic rights to gay people marginalizes them in a way that makes it okay
to think of them as lesser people, perhaps even less than human.

Government-sanctioned discrimination against gay people makes homophobes feel justified in their hatred. And as long as this continues, gay people will continue to be on the receiving end of that hatred.

Ask Matthew Shepard whether anyone wanted to "exterminate" him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
32. You do know that I was being facetious?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. i think they are being willfully ignorant so they can feign outrage.
it's obvious to the rest of us you were illustrating a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. It seems a lot of people are missing that.
I thought you made your point pretty clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
20. If they used donations/tithings, they should lose their tax exempt status. Investigation time...

If part or all of that lobbying money came from tax exempt money to the church, they are a lobbying institution and not a tax-exempt church.

If it was taxed money, but it was collected in a church, or if there was a solicitation for that money in church, they should also lose their tax exempt status.

I think there's a solid legal foundation for this action. Some lawyers should get involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. The tax code permits churches to advocate on issues and legislation, but not for CANDIDATES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. then change the code
they should talk about Jebus or the Flying Spaghetti Monster and leave laws unto man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. They shouldn't be tax exempt, that's for sure
Tax the fuckers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
26. why? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
36. I was making a facetious point
They seem to believe that it's acceptable to put people's civil rights on a ballot for a majority vote.

How would they feel if others put their civil rights up for a majority vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. You could make a proposition removing the right to marriage.
Marriage should be defined as a marriage between two non-mormon people, just like the Founding Fathers believed.

Kind of like the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
27. Where do I sign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
34. No, let's just remove state tax exemption from all churches.
We'll call it the "Religious Equality Act." Make it so that the funding must go toward schools or something so we can call it a school funding act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
41. I think you should ASK PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN CALIFORNIA



Or is this more about expressing your anger to strangers than it is about getting political progress from your neighbors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
44. maybe they should try to ban straight people from getting married
just to make a point... since california is down with taking peoples rights away, maybe an example should be made...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
49. Where do I sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
50. Put forth a constitutional amendment that outlaws divorce.
They shouldn't be against that, right? Add a provision for death by stoning for infidelity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
51. Just remove their tax-exempt status in the state.
They'll leave in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
52. My town in Central CA has 90,000 people and 10 Mormon churches.
I have many Mormons in my neighborhood. They were out IN FORCE to push H8. There were CHILDREN on the street corners waiving their signs. Many other churches were involved also, but I blame the Mormons for this. It has changed my view of them. I have been courted by them to join when I was younger. I was fired from a job when the new owner was Mormon and found out I was not. But for the most part, I have thought they were "live and let live." NO MORE. They have crossed the line. I will support any efforts to curtail their political activities. OR, they can pay taxes and do whatever they want. At least we know where they stand now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. One more thing.
My Mormon neighbor who was canvasing the neighborhood and handing out Yes on H8 signs was the election official at my polling place. I am sure that Mormons infiltrated these positions big time as part of their strategy.

They really need to be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
53. No - you simply run a "Defense of Marriage" initiative in Utah
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 02:49 PM by JimDandy
that makes it mandatory:
1. for the state to prosecute every instance of polygamy (and the inevitable welfare fraud that accompanies it);
2. to prosecute both the husband and the wives (which they NEVER have done, even for welfare fraud);and
3. for judges to impose set prison sentences (no discretion) on every polygamist.

Do this the next time they put up a Mormon presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Why do they only prosecute the men?
I was watching a BBC program about people with GSA--Genetic Sexual Attraction. Usually it involves brothers and sisters who did not grow up together, meet as adults, and experience an intense love for each other. One of the couples interviewed was a brother and sister from Germany. They have had four children together. The man has been sentenced to two separate jail terms of over three years, but the woman was never even charged with anything and in fact got to keep the youngest child (the older three were taken away at birth).
Why can't people just stay out of other people's sex lives when they are both consenting adults, whether they are same gender or suffer from GSA or whatever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Incest IS a valid reason
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 11:02 PM by JimDandy
for society and the government to interfere in adults' consensual sexual and marital affairs. The health of human society and the species is negatively affected by the genetic consequences of incest.

Gender, though, is not a valid reason for societal or government interference in adults' consensual sexual and marital affairs.

I think the females aren't prosecuted for financial reasons - the state would end up caring for the the children. The solution could be jailing one parent at a time, but BOTH definitely should be prosecuted! "It takes two to tangle."

edited to answer your question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. Older parents are as likely to have genetic issues as younger related parents
It's a slippery slope, and it's mostly supported by tradition, but actual evidence shows that older parents (over 35 to 40) are as likely to have genetic issues in their children as related younger parents.

I for one would not like to see conditions being placed on who can and cannot reproduce. But it's an issue that we as a society decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. I'm not buying the GSA you're selling. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
58. IMO, we'll be much better off making this about separation of church and state
and/or equal legal rights for all than about Mormonism. If you make it about Mormons, you will unite them with other Christians, many of whom are now either leery of them or actually believe they are Satanic. However, if Mormons seem to be getting persecuted because of a religious belief than many other Christians share, you are likely to help Mormons go mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Voice Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
60. As a Californian....
I'd prefer to see us expend our collective energy on putting up a PRODUCTIVE ballot referendum that actually has a chance of passing.

Such as this one...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=141x32495
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC