ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:22 PM
Original message |
Rachel: Talk me down. Are we looking at Bill Clinton's third term? |
|
She's found a new concern outlet. :rofl:
|
MadMaddie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It is way too early to be stressing...even if she picks a few people that served under Clinton it is clear that Obama is his own man.
|
GrizzlyMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. She's totally off base |
|
Podesta will be gone after the transition is done. Axelrod and Gibbs have no connections to the Clintons. So of the 3 long term choices he's made just one has ties to the Clinton admin.
|
Bicoastal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Worry, worry, worry... |
|
Rachel really needs to get laid.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. She's in a long term relationship. . . . |
|
but thanks for your concern.
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Maybe she needs more loving from her girl? |
|
It could be! She's too negative lately!
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
44. She's being herself. She's always been this way. Very superior. nt |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
4. she needs to wait and hear from Obama as well before she makes the talking point |
Xipe Totec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
27. She needs to run for president |
|
If she wins, then she can pick whoever she likes.
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
45. Riiight! But I think she thinks that with her one vote, she gets to set |
|
his agenda. I knew she was going to do that.
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Can't we get a week without concern trolling? |
DarthDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Dump the FUCKING talk me down segment!!!!!!!! WE WON!!!
|
liberalmuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 09:26 PM by liberalmuse
I need to cut my vacation short and get back to work. According what I've heard and read today, Obama has already fucked up his Presidency before even being sworn in. All this idiotic speculation is going to drive me insane.
On edit: I do love Rachel. It's not her. It's EVERYONE.
|
merh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
Divernan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
37. It is idiotic, which is particularly irritating since she is so bright & knows better. |
|
She's hyping the drama to keep her ratings up. Her constant, exaggerated facial expressions and intonations come off to me as talking down to and trying to manipulate people. Is she capable of a calmer, more serious presentation? I get enough droll political humor and commentary from Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. Someone remind Rachel she's not on the Comedy Channel. I found her entertaining for a few weeks and then found her irritating. If she develops some more confidence in the value of her comments and analysis, maybe she'll dial down the hyper delivery.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think her "concern" persona makes for a useful way to introduce more progressive positions in a non-threatening way to people who have NO EXPOSURE to anything resembling real liberalism...
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. I'm not sure. Chicken Little is hardly one of the most beloved literary figures. |
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
dascientist
(385 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message |
9. TALK HER DOWN, YES, MMMMMMM YES! |
fascisthunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message |
10. actually, she may be right |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 09:27 PM by fascisthunter
if we don't push these "centrists" back... I had a feeling this would happen especially after how these so-called centrists behaved while the Dems had the majority. Let's all look at all that really bad legislation that Bush wanted passed and see how many of these centrists voted for it too. Me thinks these "centrists" also love the Bush tax cuts.
|
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:29 PM
Original message |
well hopefully Obama will see the show and get an idea |
|
of what we're expecting from him. I see Rachel's point, but it might be too soon to worry about that.
|
Lumpsum
(611 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
But I'm gonna give Obama 6 months or so before I start questioning.
|
fascisthunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. I suppose you are correct however I say we push now... |
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message |
12. The Talk Me Down segment isn't about Rachel. |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 09:29 PM by Gregorian
She's playing the role of a concerned viewer. That's my take on it.
There is no way Rachel Maddow does not know the answer to the question she asks during these segments.
I seem to recall the same posts on this forum when Colbert's show first started. There was a lot of talk about how he was really a conservative.
By the way, it took me quite a while to really discover that Victoria Jackson wasn't playing her role. But Rachel isn't Victoria, by any means. Haha.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
19. He talked her down... I thought it was a good segment |
|
I think everyone needs to mute that segment if they can't handle it.
|
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. A successful 2/3rd's talkdown. |
|
:)
She's cool.
I like the King of Bhutan's "awesome footware".
|
Lisa0825
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
I love her show, and I am sick of people bitching about her. "Talk me down" expresses particular concerns and asks for reasons NOT to be concerned. The segment generally diffuses whatever the topic was. Are people here too dense to understand that??? I expect more of DUers! :wtf:
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
47. Really?? We're dense??? Negative Nelly CAN'T be talked down.. Didn't |
|
you hear her say she was only 2 thirds talked down??? That means her viewers get to hear her bitch about this yet again. Shoot me.
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
15. We have a lot to do with it. |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 09:29 PM by Eric J in MN
If we let Republicans take back the House or the Senate, then the Obama presidency will be more like the Clinton presidency then if we don't.
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
BuyingThyme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message |
17. What the fuck could that possibly mean? |
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. Allowing more mergers of media companies... |
|
...and of financial companies.
Ideally, the government would be breaking up huge corporations.
But Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) is considering changing the law to allow a single bank to have over 10% of the nation's deposit money.
|
BuyingThyme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
That's how we got into this mess in the first place, by way of too-big-to-fail.
Schumer can get stuffed.
|
S_E_Fudd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
20. And that's a bad thing?...nt |
MelSC
(75 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
24. She's annoying as hell |
|
I'm sorry, I have no idea what has happened to this woman, she is nothing but a buzzkill. I used to love her show too!
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
25. If this is code for "SURPLUS", I'm all for it! |
PretzelWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
26. settle down, Rachel. We won. Try and act like it. |
|
you must be getting lots of ratings with that tagline. But it is putting you in a box where you will be branded that "TALK ME DOWN" lady who wears the dark jackets.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
28. WOW-she was "talked down" 2/3rds of the way! That's a first! |
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
31. I'm anxious to see how effective two ex-Senators (Obama and Biden) will be |
|
in influencing the legislature to get their programs through, such as a reform of healthcare. I think it's very premature and unfair to try to prejudge how the Obama administration might govern at this point. I'm hoping that Obama will find a very receptive legislative body before him, eager to consider his programs for reform. And since his coattails in this past election were very long, I think that gives both Democratic and Republican legislators coming up for re-election in 2010 something to seriously think about. Having an amazing campaigner like Obama on your side or against your side in 2010 could be a factor in their minds.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
32. Genius Nate Silver thanks both the Alaskan and Georgia elections |
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
35. I think so too. How could the GA results be soo far off |
|
when I saw damn well how long the lines were all over the state? They tossed out results! I feared they would do that to us early voters. Looks like we were right to be wary. :( :mad:
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
36. He said the poll discrepancies are enough to bring in Obama lawyers |
MarjorieG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
38. Both states have admitted, bad theft in recent years. Means the Senate. |
PretzelWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
39. Georgia is a racist fucktard state |
|
there are good people there. Don't get me wrong. But racism and disenfranchisement is institutionalized down there.
I'm sure they were offended that so many "colored" folk dared to vote for that "uppity fella".
|
Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
41. Little doubt about AK. |
|
Polls were 10 points off. It was fixed
|
Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
40. Yeesh. I thought winning 350 EV would get her back on our side |
|
Silly me. Unless she's being sarcastic
|
MarjorieG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
42. Change would be Obama's policy and decisions. Necessary with least mistakes and wasted time. |
|
Clinton's term proved how mistakes can cause the loss of Congress.
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message |
43. She's preparing Obama's agenda. What took her so long? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message |