A question for you: Why are so few crazy people driving so many debates?

[MrScorpio]

Why we are stuck to debating so many crazy points all the time?

Why can't all the sane people tell nut jobs to shut the fuck up?

Let's have a return to sanity

[Trajan]

1. I dont understand the question ....

I dont understand the grammar ...

[H2O Man]

2. This also, too.

[MrScorpio]

3. Sorry, Jeez. I've been up all night

I tried to fix it

Read it again please

[jonnyblitz]

4. not everybody can agree on who the sane people are and

who the nut jobs are. there are people here that many think are sane that I think are fucking NUT JOB CENTRAL, especially in the lounge.

it's all subjective.

[MrScorpio]

6. In the Lounge, we admit we're crazy

I agree on the subjectivity

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

5. It's sad that we've immediately returned to the circular firing squad.

But such is life on DU...

[MrScorpio]

7. Actually, I was talking about the debate arena in general

But if you want to cite DU examples, I won't stop you

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

8. Well, generally speaking, that's always been the case.

It's the nutjobs that have always driven debates because they present the starkest contrasts. People that mostly agree don't have a lot to debate, after all.