Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2 paragraphs that make me wonder just how peaceful Obama is

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:35 AM
Original message
2 paragraphs that make me wonder just how peaceful Obama is
Edited on Sat Nov-08-08 11:36 AM by ensho

http://counterpunch.com/


Hail to the Chief of Staff

-snip-

Emanuel, as Ralph Nader points out in my interview with him below, represents the worst of the Clinton years. His profile as regards Israel is explored well on this site by lawyer John Whitbeck. He’s a former Israeli citizen, who volunteered to serve in Israel in 1991 and who made brisk millions in Wall Street. He is a super-Likudnik hawk, whose father was in the fascist Irgun in the late Forties, responsible for cold-blooded massacres of Palestinians. Dad’s unreconstructed ethnic outlook has been memorably embodied in his recent remark to the Ma’ariv newspaper that "Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel… Why wouldn't he be ? What is he, an Arab? He's not going to clean the floors of the White House."

Working in the Clinton White House, Emanuel helped push through NAFTA, the crime bill, the balanced budget and welfare reform. He favored the war in Iraq, and when he was chairing the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2006 he made great efforts to knock out antiwar Democratic candidates. On this site in October and November, 2006, John Walsh documented both the efforts and Emanuel’s role in losing the Democrats seats they would otherwise have won.
-snip-
------------------------------


and Obama will put missiles in Poland.

and more troops in Afghanistan.

guess peace will have to wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama isn't as progressive as some DUers hope n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. really
read his speeches, read his policies

he's a great guy, but he's no Bernie Saunders or Dennis K.

As far as I can see, he's a left of center guy, but still a centerist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. He's pragmatic
He knows what can be done and what can't be done in 4 years or 8 years. I'll probably be flamed for saying this but Dennis and Bernie as much as I love them would be too much of a shock to the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. De-fib a stopped heart? sounds like the cure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
63. A stopped heart...
...isn't fibrillating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. which system?
We have two systems. If you are talking about the system of the people governing themselves, Sanders would be a relief not a shock.

If you are talking about the system of corporate corruption, bribed politicians and the rule pf the wealthy powerful few, there is no avoiding "shocking" that system, since the only alternative is tyranny and oppression.

we may have to "settle for" as a matter of practicality and tactical needs, but must we laud and praise and defend it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. I think right -of-center.
And in my last reply, i forgot this...:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. I'd wager very few DU'ers are so uninformed they think Obama is "progressive"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Some are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
46. Some of us actually paid atttention to his voting record in the Senate
Which actually ranks him in the top 5 most liberal voters in the Senate. So I guess that makes him "right of center":sarcasm:
For a political site, the ignorance of actual political fact here is astonishing at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. depends
On culture war issues, yes he is "liberal." But on true political issues of power and economics, it remains to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #46
62. and some of us are aware that the vast majority of legislation is FAR from progressive
it's a piss poor way of gaging how progressive a politician is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
61. I never thought that at all
I got what I thought I voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. Compared to what we have been dealing with
if Obama were anymore left he'd be right. Plus how much of his campaign bluster was just bluster? Do you think a black man spouting far left policies would ever get elected. Give the guy a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. But he's the most liberal senator!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. DID YOU LISTEN TO ANYTHING HE SAID FOR THE LAST 20 MONTHS??
Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I expect alot of FISA moments on here over the next 4 years
Myself. I'm pretty sure I know who I voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. That's what I'm thinking. He told us how he felt on Afghanistan.
He's someone who likes to get things done, so Rahm makes sense in that way. And Barack will be President; Rahm will work for him. He has Axelrod nearby to balance out Rahm.

I voted for Obama knowing he was more conservative than I am. But I knew he valued diplomacy and intelligence and would restore those tools for our national security.

And I knew he would be open to considering various approaches to national security challenges, including less visible, less destructive techniques.

Let's hope he develops a more targeted precise approach to destroying or negotiating with the enemies of our country.

Thank goodness he was against the invasion of Iraq from the beginning. He dared to read the facts and oppose the powerful lawless Bush-Cheney administration.

I am holding on to my hopes for improvements in our national security departments. The Bush lawlessness chased a lot of good people out of the State Department and CIA.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. However, Obama is also no pushover who will just do whatever
Emanuel wants. Obama is the one in charge. And I don't think he's a hawk at ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's talked about putting more troops in Afghanistan for 2 years
Why does that come as a surprise to you now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry, you lost me at the word "Nader". I didn't read further. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Ack, I MISSED THAT.
Nevermind. Pffffft. Who the hell cares what Nader says?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. I almost stopped at the Counterpunch link. They HATE Democrats more than Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. if there is one thing we've learned about Obama, its that he lets people walk all over him
to push their own agenda.

or not

depending on whether you're paying attention.

I expect Obama will make some mistakes but he is no W and no Clinton. Cheney/Rahm will NOT be pushing him around.

Have you not been paying attention?

Yes, Rahm is too conservative for me. He's not the kind of liberal I want running things but Dennis and his UFOs would not be effective in that position.

Give Obama a chance. He's proved us naysayers wrong every time before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Yet another person who apparently didn't listen to a word Obama said over the past two years.
Not his fault if you had no idea what you were signing up for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Spot on
and absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. Obama is peace, but he isn't no pushover.
Edited on Sat Nov-08-08 11:43 AM by SunsetDreams
Regarding missles in Poland, that information came from Poland. I prefer to hear it from his mouth.
Somehow it doesn't seem plausible that Obama would say anything like this, since he said there is only one President at a time.

With regard to Obama picking Emanuel, Obama has said repeatedly he doesn't want "yes men".
Obama will listen to all sides, but rest assured Obama will make ALL decisions.
Because Emanuel has made some decisions you don't agree with, you think automatically Obama would do the same thing?
Obama isn't Emanuel, I'm really tired of this guilt by association stuff.
It's the same thing the Right tried to do to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. I agree
The missile thing would be disappointing, but I don't believe Obama would say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. Hear Hear... have a little patience... Obama is a smart man and no pushover!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. why do you waste your time reading Counterpunch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. ah yes quoting Ralph Nader quoting Emanuel's father.

How relevant.


BTW what does your father think about this thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. he is dead and was a Repug. thought I was a feminist nut case
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
23. First of all, Obama hasn't said a word about missiles in Poland.
That's 3rd party information that I don't believe anyway.

Second, anyone who is surprised that Obama wants more troops in Afghanistan hasn't been paying attention to what Obama has said the last two years.

Finally, you lost me at Counterpunch.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
24. who gives a damn what nader thinks. Nader, who called Obama an "uncle tom" thinks
Edited on Sat Nov-08-08 11:53 AM by still_one
The guy hasn't even taken office and the extreme left and right is jumping all over him

nader is a loser, and will go down in history as irrelevent

counterpunch is also a less than even handed publication whose primary agenda is NOT a two state solution, but the destruction of Israel

As far as the chief of staff is concerned, he will push legislation through that Obama wants. It is Obama that makes the decision, not his chief of staff.

Obama made it very clear during the campaign that he would have diversity in his administration. If you didn't realize that, you were not listening



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
54. every voice is important
Ideas are what matters, no matter the source. Dismissing a person's ideas because they are "irrelevant" or a "loser" is anti-intellectualism. I think we have had about enough of that over the last 8 years.

Expressing our opinions is our civic duty, and is essential to the functioning of a healthy democracy. "Jumping all over" our elected officials is good citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #54
65. I am just expressing my opinion about nader. I have heard enough of nader and bush to know where
they stand


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
25. I think now would be a good time for everyone to read TEAM OF RIVALS
a book about Lincoln's choices for his cabinet and staff. Lincoln actually installed men who ran against him as President in his cabinet as he wanted to hear all sides of the issues. I think Obama is cut from the same cloth. He doesn't want to be surrounded by yes men/women. He wants to debate the issues with a wide range of people.

I think he will astound and confound a lot of people as we hear more of his appointments. I wouldn't doubt that he not only have some more DNCers but even a Republican or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. what Lincoln did way back then has no relation to what is happening


today. Lincoln wasn't in charge of a Military Empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I do seem to recall that he did have some kind of military issue at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
49. Oh, snap!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
66. the US at that time was not a world empire like it is today.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
47. You might want to bone up on your history
and take rosesaylavee's advice -- read "Team of Rivals." N.B. It's Obama's favorite book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
52. Are you fucking stupid?
The country was in the midst of a Civil War at the time! My god...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
26. Oh yes and Ralph Nader advanced the cause of peace so much didn't he
I mean putting Dumbya in the White House resulted in the peace and prosperity we are enjoying in Iraq, the humane and compassionate treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantanomo and America's international prestige being at its highest point ever:sarcasm:

Not to mention Emmanuel served on Clinton's staff during the historic detente between Israel and the PLO in the early-to-mid 1990s and coordinated the Oslo Accords signing ceremony

Ralphie should get a clue and stop helping Republicans steal elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. Can we give the guy his first 100 days...
Edited on Sat Nov-08-08 12:03 PM by liberalmuse
before we start jumping on him? I was originally a Kucinich supporter and am well aware of Obama's political leanings. I loved Clinton, but he was way more conservative in many of his policies than I would have preferred. Doesn't matter. He was one of our best Presidents.

I've watched Obama. He's made a couple decisions I have not liked while in the Senate, but I've also found that he has very good judgement most of the time. When he gets it right, he has impeccable judgement, as a matter-of-fact. I'm not telling people not to criticize him, but it would be nice if we had a lot more information on his Presidential governing style before we start. I'd like to continue to celebrate for just a couple weeks longer, especially after 8 years of having people in the WH so heinous that every day was a fresh new, unbearable hell.

And Nader? Fuck that arrogant ass. That being said, it would be interesting if he were in Obama's cabinet. We could use a little protection from some of the shit being imported from China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. The Chief of Staff's job is to push legislation through Congress .....
If Emanuel doesn't agree with Obama's policies, he probably wouldn't have taken the job.

I highly doubt that Rahm could talk Obama down from a position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. Did you vote for Obama? Did you volunteer or donate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
60. I doubt that she did -- read all the threads th OP is starting:
Nothing, but extremely negative opinions and articles about Obama's choices.
Sounds like it's either a freeper or a disgruntled PUMA posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
34. Ralph Nader should put a sock in it and choke.
It's no secret that Nader doesn't like Obama. He's criticized Obama more since the election than he criticized Bush in eight years. He's an ass. Can we wait until Obama is inaugurated before we start skewering him? Folks on DU are glummer than my Republicon insurance agent.

jeebus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
35. Ralph Nader can go fuck himself for all I care... he called Obama an Uncle Tom....
ON ELECTION NIGHT! Fuck him and fuck anyone who still listens to his crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
37. I don't w0nder about you at all. YOU are a filth peddler, peddling lies.
Obama specifically denied the Poland/missile story. too bad for your ilk.

Emanuel is a good choice for CoS. He'll be instrumental in pushing through Obama's legislation- not creating it.

And counterpunch is about as good a shitrag as Worldnut daily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. i don't either, i think it's pretty clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
58. that too, and or to quote another poster:
" Sometimes a primary warrior never lets it go".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
39. He must be a disappointement. HAS TO BE A DISAPPOINTMENT
CANNOT...BE...SATISFIED....OR...TRUST....HIS ....JUDGEMENT.....EVER....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
40. Rahm Emmanuel is bad news. I wish Obama could reconsider.
Unfortunately, I think this choice may have been forced on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. by who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. yeah, why would he pick a close friend who has experience
on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, and who has the skills to push through legislation on the Hill?

He should have pulled a Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton and chosen someone who didn't know how to get the job done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. Ralph, I think you let the engine running in your...
1964 Chevrolet Corvair

Maybe you ought to turn your engine off now, you created enough political pollution in the year 2000 to render thousands of Americans dead under George W Bush, because you stole the chance for Gore to win, with your tens of thousands of bull-headed voters.

If Ralph Nader comes on my television ever again, I swear I will mute the sound and change the channel ASAP.

Ralph Nader knows NOTHING when it comes to American politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
45. When he worked for Clinton
he pushed Clinton's initiatives. When he chaired the DCCC he did his own thing (cause he could). I marvel that so many DUers think Obama's gonna just let this guy have free reign.

Rahm is a bulldog and gets things done, knows the game and puts up with no crap. That's exactly who I'd want at my side and covering my back too.

So many neophytes here at DU, when did this tragedy occur?

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexanDem Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
48. whether Nader says it abt Emanuel or not -- all this is true. >>
Just read up on him. There was a roast of Emanuel replayed late last night on C-Span, and the various speakers mentioned a lot of this stuff. Perhaps C-Span has it on their webpage if you care to listen. The only consoluation I have is that he is not a policymaker, but he is Obama's good friend. Granted, Obama has let us know he strongly supports Israel and he will beef up the war in Afganistan. My thoughts now are this is far too early in the game to draw conclusions. We have to give him a chance. Let's get him in the White House first. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
55. obamas not a pacifist, hes only against dumb wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
56. When Rahm Emanuel does a push-up, he's not lifting himself up.
He's pushing the earth down.

There is no CTRL button on his computer, because Rahm Emanuel is always in control.

Rahm Emanuel doesn't read books. He stares them down until he gets the information he needs from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
57. Obama ought to have 100% freedom to choose his own
inner circle. He has to have the people he thinks he can work with. How else can Obama do anything?

Nobody is far left enough for the far left. Not even Obama. Nothing constructive ever comes from Nader people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sub.theory Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
59. You lost me at quoting Ralph Nader
I don't trust a thing Nader has to say. Obama has my trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
64. you mean Ralph Nader who actually called Obama an "Uncle Tom!" on national TV tues. night?
That guy? Geez.. if you're getting your views from that racist asshole, then no one here can set you straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
67. This really makes me worry about Iran.
I was hoping we could put that inane saber-rattling to rest but it looks like we're going to have to push back hard against yet another Iraq-style genocidal fiasco, and I seriously doubt whether it will do any good. If Obama was listening, he wouldn't have appointed Rahm Rahm Rahm Iran.

k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curse of greyface Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
68. You know some Progressive Democrats support the Afghan war..
I happen to be one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC