HardWorkingDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 10:53 PM
Original message |
Time Magazine's Person of the Year - IS there ANY Doubt? |
|
If it is not Barack Obama, all integrity of Time Magazine (what it has left) is down the toilet.
|
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Who else even comes close? |
d_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Of course!! How could I forget? |
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The Corporation. This new administration will test it. nt |
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
PretzelWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
7. They'll pick Sarah Palin or Hillary just to sell magazines |
JoePhilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
Voice for Peace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
Marsala
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. Bah, we already won it in 2006 |
|
Weirdest Person of the Year ever.
|
JoePhilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
36. We didn't deserve it that time. |
Whoa20
(144 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message |
9. this is as much as a given |
|
as is the Earth revolving around the sun tomorrow
|
CaliforniaPeggy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message |
11. This is beyond a given. nt |
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I was assuming Sarah Palin. |
Democrats_win
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |
15. NO NO! Not again! We just did this. Will there be paper ballots for Times MOTY vote? |
|
Will there be polling? Which poll will have greater weight? If we had only had prop 8 before the Time Warner merger! Who will talk us down the night before the announcement? What about the competition. Remember, TIME made YOU the man of the year once. As a former winner, who do you think should win? Isn't it a slam dunk?
To Democrats, the words, "Slam Dunk" means bush is taking us into another fool war. This could be a nightmare. Yet...
For this man, Time will stand still, OBAMA is the man of the year.
|
liberalhistorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Oh, I wouldn't put it past them to name Bush or |
|
Rove or any of the rest of them one last time, not at all. This is the last time they really can do so, and they may take advantage of it. Remember, this is Time magazine, after all.
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
She's given a new life to comedy in this country.
|
mile18blister
(460 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I wouldn't be offended if they chose the man behind the scene |
|
who made it all possible: Howard Dean
|
Earth Bound Misfit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message |
19. If it isn't "That One", it HAS TO BE... |
pirate_satellite
(100 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message |
20. I don't need Time Magazine |
|
You know the audience that subscribes to Time Magazine? The audience of the people that wanna know what's happening in the world, week by week. The people that work during the day and can read it small... right? And it's concise. And there's pictures in it. You know those: a certain class of people. It's a class of people that take the magazine seriously.
I mean, sure, I could read it. You know, I read it on the airplanes, but I don't take it seriously. If I want to find out anything I'm not gonna read Time Magazine! I'm not gonna read Newsweek. I'm not gonna read any of these magazines, cause they've just got too much to lose by printing the truth. You know that!
|
EmperorHasNoClothes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
21. It has already happened |
|
The part about their integrity being down the toilet, I mean.
|
ROh70
(340 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Obama is person of the decade. |
TheDonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message |
|
:puke: :puke::puke: :puke:
|
ROh70
(340 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message |
24. A possible choice - tie among Greenspan, Phil Gramm and Bush |
|
for being central figures in bringing about the financial meltdown of 2008.
|
krawhitham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message |
25. The 750 Billion dollar man, Henry Paulson |
TeamJordan23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message |
26. No doubt. He beat the Clinton machine and the Republicans in same year. nm |
Blue For You
(466 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 02:44 AM
Response to Original message |
27. McCain. He ran such a positive campaign and gave that |
|
warm and fuzzy speech at the end. One minute he's David Duke, and then gives a speech and he's Gandhi or something.
|
cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 03:05 AM
Response to Original message |
28. I think they'll pick Rahm to wind people up. lol. |
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 04:18 AM
Response to Original message |
29. I think its gonna be gw again |
regnaD kciN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 04:22 AM
Response to Original message |
30. Isn't it practically always the case... |
|
...that, in years when we elect a new president, that person automatically becomes PotY?
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message |
31. Maybe it will be "us" again! nt |
woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message |
32. Can they resist this cover? |
HardWorkingDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
Unless you saw the debate, you'd swear it had to be photoshopped, don't you?
|
SoxFan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message |
Guy Whitey Corngood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
35. If they don't pick Tito The Builder they're asholes. |
|
Because that worked out so well.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-09-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message |
37. Hmm. Good question. I can't think of one soul who stood out |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message |