Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jon Meacham (editor of Newsweek) just said on MTP that McCain ran a very noble campaign!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 10:55 AM
Original message
Jon Meacham (editor of Newsweek) just said on MTP that McCain ran a very noble campaign!
I would like to move on, but I just thought that was a very stupid comment...he said something like "We should note that Senator McCain ran an all in all, noble campaign...it could have been a lot worse in the last couple of months..." I am so sick of this revisionist history. And it made me think of the "insider" column in Newsweek where the picture they paint of McCain was as a removed romantic...they say that the Palin pick was "romantic, a bit impulsive"...that McCain thought his fake rushing back to Washington was "romantic"...etc. It reminded me of the column that Jon Mecham wrote about the problems with the Palin pick, and how even in that column, he bent over backwards to kiss McCain's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Noble like a horse's ass. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Classy concession speech, not so classy campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh yeah, McCrank's a real noble guy. This is the same guy who didn't
give a shit that he possibly could have sentenced us to do time under a president Sarah-shit-for-brains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Palin pick was "romantic"?
When's the last time you were wooed by a common, ignorant thug?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. True! (If you only count the last five minutes of his campaign.)
Otherwise it exceeded even the slime the bush crime family gave us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, noble, as in Nasty Old Bullshitter Lying Eagerly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. He nobly called him a socialist terrorist who dangerously didn't put America first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. and a perv who wanted to teach kids about sex
and someone who would rather play basketball than visit the troops....just to name a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. All while raising your taxes with Bill Ayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. McCain's campaign was not noble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. it was the most...
most disgusting filthy in the gutter campaign in modern history....the McCain team did everything they could to paint Obama as a scary black man with ties to terrorist...FUCK MEACHAM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Let him keep saying that, the GOP has lost ANOTHER generation of minorities because they're...
...willingness to be a non exclusive bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. oh yeah
and the Newsweek column also said that McCain thought the "joint town halls" would be "romantic"...I just think the article whitwashed over him and his role in the campaign tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. Huh?
Did he just "phone" his reporting in during the GE? Which campaign was he watching?
He obviously forgot McCain's apparent refusal to so much as look at Obama during the first debate.

He obviously forgot McCain's referring to Obama as "that one" during the second debate.

He obviously forgot about the McCain campaign "unleashing" Sarah Palin post VP-debate to publicly accuse Obama of, among other things, "palling around with terrorists" and being a "socialist" and continued to promote such charges at the third debate.

Although he did make SOME effort to try to tone things on the trail after people started yelling things like "kill him" and "off with his head", he and Palin (along with their new "friend", Joe The Plumber) continued to stoke people's fears about Obama throughout the rest of the GE.

Despite promises NOT to do so, he (implicitly) allowed the RNC to use Rev. Wright in the final days of the GE by not speaking out against them.

The only 3-4 things that McCain did during the campaign that I would consider to be decent or honorable were his "ad" congratulating Obama on his nomination at the DNC, his (minimal) attempts to calm down his audience by publicly reassuring a supporter that Obama was a "decent" person (and throwing his supporter into a confused tailspin), his concession speech, and probably, most importantly, his campaign refusing to allow Palin to deliver a "concession speech".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. It was Palin and the plumber that drug it down while John nobly
tried to stop it. O lord, these guys are never wrong about anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. Well he's right.
If the standard is that no crosses were burned on live TV or that Ted Nugent didn't warm up the crowds by shooting an Obama effigy. If those were the standards then it was as pure as snow (no pun intended). :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. Maybe that douche bag hasn't read this article yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. nothing but a propagandist.....either willful or exceedingly stupid:
From MSNBC's January 31 post-State of the Union coverage:

MATTHEWS: And here, the Democrats had a fellow come on tonight and say -- this is how strong he got -- "Are the president's policies the best way to win this war?" That's it. That was the criticism. Are they afraid to take on this president on his central, signature issue of the war in Iraq?

MEACHAM: Well, I hate to say it, but I do think that -- that response illuminates a good bit of the Democratic problem right now, which is that there is not been a powerfully articulated critique of this president. And there is a -- there's much to critique, obviously.

MATTHEWS: Are they afraid because of divisions within their own party over policy to make a clear statement?

MEACHAM: I think they're afraid because the people who get elected president, who are Democrats, are centrist governors. And I think that they have a very hard time playing to the -- keeping the left wing of their party happy, which is the base; and they're the very active people. They're the most vocal people. They're the people who have an almost irrational hatred of George W. Bush in the way the hard right in the Republican Party had an irrational hatred of Bill Clinton. I mean some things never change.



http://mediamatters.org/items/200602010004

http://mediamatters.org/discuss/200602010004

read the excellent comments

PS...don't forget what a slimey, disingenuous opportunist Matthews always was, and always will be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC