The 20 most corrupt members of Congress
Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL)
Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA)
Rep. John T. Doolittle (R-CA)
Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL)
Rep. Vito J. Fossella (R-NY)
Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-LA)
Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA)
Rep. Daniel Lipinski (D-IL)
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Rep. Gary G. Miller (R-CA)
Rep. Alan B. Mollohan (D-WV)
Rep. Timothy F. Murphy (R-PA)
Rep. John P. Murtha (D-PA)
Rep. Steve Pearce (R-NM)
Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-NY)
Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ)
Rep. Harold Rogers (R-KY)
Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK)
Rep. Don Young (R-AK)
Dishonorable mentions
Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)
Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN)
Rep. Laura Richardson (D-CA)
Rep. Michael Turner (R-OH)
----------------------------------
Beyond DeLay: The 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress (and four to watch)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This is CREW’s 2008 annual report – our fourth edition – on congressional corruption. Over the past few years, corruption has become a significant political issue, with interest peaking in early 2007. In the 2006 mid-term elections, exit polls showed that 42% of voters called corruption an extremely important issue in their choices at the polls, ahead of terrorism, the economy, and the war in Iraq. With the downturn in the economy, however, voters’ attention is unsurprisingly more focused on pocketbook issues than on congressional misconduct. Nevertheless, ethics still matter if for no other reason than that members of Congress who are using their positions for their own self-interest may not be focusing on the needs of their constituents.
Nine members included on last year’s list have fallen off either because they have announced their retirements, the ethics committees have taken limited action or more likely failed to act, or there is no new information to add. Whenever a member falls off, however, another is always available to serve as a replacement. New to this year’s list are Reps. Marsha Blackburn, Vern Buchanan, Vito Fossella, Dan Lipinski, Charlie Rangel, Laura Richardson and Mike Turner, and Sens. Mary Landrieu and Norm Coleman.
Of this year’s list of 24, at least 12 are under investigation: Ken Calvert, John Doolittle, Tom Feeney, Vito Fossella, William Jefferson, Jerry Lewis, Alan Mollohan, Gary Miller, Tim Murphy, Rick Renzi, Don Young and Ted Stevens. One other, Charlie Rangel, is under a self-initiated House ethics committee investigation.
As in the past, members continue to use their positions for the financial benefit of themselves, their friends and their families. Earmarks for large campaign contributors are commonplace and many members have traded legislative assistance for personal favors. As we noted last year, the number of members who have provided incorrect information or failed to include information on their personal financial disclosure forms is striking.
Lying on personal financial disclosure forms is a federal crime, punishable by up to five years in jail under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Last year we advised members that although prosecutions for such violations have been rare, they are possible. Perhaps now that Sen. Ted Stevens has been indicted on seven counts of lying on his financial disclosure forms, members will take their obligations to respond fully and truthfully on these forms more seriously. We continue to suggest that the House and Senate ethics committees take a stronger stand against members who deliberately provide erroneous information or withhold information on these forms. As we have said repeatedly, ignoring congressional misconduct until it becomes so egregious that the Department of Justice steps in is simply not a rational, responsible, or reasonable ethics enforcement strategy.
Although new ethics reforms were passed this Congress and the House finally approved a new investigative process, little appears to have changed with the ethics committees. In the Senate, both Sens. David Vitter and Pete Domenici were given passes for their misconduct. Sen. Vitter on the weak ground that his crime of soliciting for prostitution had taken place before he was a senator, and Sen. Domenici on the absurd notion that there was “no substantial evidence” that he had attempted to improperly influence an ongoing corruption investigation in New Mexico, despite clear statements from former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias that the senator had done exactly that. The committee never even considered Sen. Stevens’ misconduct. In fact, the only senator chastised by the committee was Larry Craig, suggesting that the Senate believes there is no more serious offense than gay sex.
more...
http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/report