Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IMHO This is the only solution to the economic crisis..... LINK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:30 PM
Original message
IMHO This is the only solution to the economic crisis..... LINK
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/09/the_mini_depression_and_the_ma/

The Mini Depression and the Maximum-Strength Remedy

By Robert Reich

"When Barack Obama takes office in January, he will inherit a mess. What to do? (Because I'm an informal economic adviser, I should warn anyone who reads this that it reflects only my thoughts and therefore should not be attributed to him or to anyone else advising him.)

First, understand that the main problem right now is not the supply of credit. Yes, Wall Street is paralyzed at the moment because the bursting of the housing and other asset bubbles means that lenders are fearful that creditors won't repay loans. But even if credit were flowing, those loans wouldn't save jobs. Businesses want to borrow now only to remain solvent and keep their creditors at bay. If they fail to do so, and creditors push them into reorganization under bankruptcy, they'll cut their payrolls, to be sure. But they're already cutting their payrolls. It's far from clear they'd cut more jobs under bankruptcy reorganization than they're already cutting under pressure to avoid bankruptcy and remain solvent.

This means bailing out Wall Street or the auto industry or the insurance industry or the housing industry may at most help satisfy creditors for a time and put off the day of reckoning, but industry bailouts won't reverse the downward cycle of job losses.

The real problem is on the demand side of the economy."

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Makes perfect sense to me.
Hasn't Obama been talking about infrastructure spending as a stimulus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. To go further, the real problem is increased gloabal energy demand that was not met by supply...
Edited on Sun Nov-09-08 09:57 PM by Bread and Circus
That, coupled with nefarious speculation and conspicuous, drove our fuel/energy costs through the roof (at the pump and in our homes).

I agree that we need increased energy production and I wholeheartedly agree with most of Reich's approach (which echoes Friedman, Gore, Obama, et. al.).

Just "increasing demand" aka "increasing consumerism" is a short term non-fix.

What we need is a fundamental increase in domestic energy production leveraged by electric plugin hybrid vehicles.

I've been harping on this for a while on DU (as well as a lot of the "energy/environment" du'ers)

Here's a post I threw up a while back:

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Bread%20and%20Circus/6

The only thing that could radically and effectively change the dynamic are electric cars. For starters, prototypic electric vehicles are insanely fuel efficient (equivalent to 100+ mpg). But more than that, the switch from fossil fuel as being the energy medium for transportation to electricity changes the whole ballgame. The main reason for this is that electricity can be had in many different ways: wind, solar, hydro, nuclear, coal, biomass, etc. This does several things domestically. One, it will drive the value of of many non-fossil fuel energy sources up. Two, it means we have the capacity to generate nearly all of our own energy. It's the only real way to "get off foreign oil". Without electric transportation, proposing such a thing is purely nonsense. Three, control of emissions will be centralized at the point of electricity production which lends itself to better procedures for reduction, filtration, or sequestration. Fourth, it will help "democratize energy", especially if the the mechanics of our electrical grid are changed so that it is bi-directional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC