Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condoms Trump Abstinence in Obama Global AIDS Policy, Aide Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 12:43 AM
Original message
Condoms Trump Abstinence in Obama Global AIDS Policy, Aide Says
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601116&sid=aKrIK33ovrk8

President-elect Barack Obama will reverse U.S. family planning and AIDS prevention strategies that have long linked global funding to anti-abortion and abstinence education, a public-health adviser said.

Public health policies of President George W. Bush's $45- billion PEPFAR program have brought AIDS drugs to almost 3 million people in poor countries such as Rwanda and Uganda, more than under any other president. Still, requirements that health workers emphasize abstinence from sex and monogamy over condom use have set back sexually transmitted disease prevention and family planning globally, said Susan F. Wood, co-chairman of Obama's advisory committee for women's health.

``We have been going in the wrong direction and we need to turn it around and be promoting prevention and family-planning services and strengthening public health,'' said Wood, a research professor at George Washington University School of Public Health in Washington.

(snip)
Obama ``is committed to looking at all this and changing the policies so that family-planning services -- both in the U.S. and the developing world -- reflect what works, what helps prevent unintended pregnancy, reduce maternal and infant mortality, prevent the spread of disease,'' Wood said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, Abstinence Only can be successful. Just ask Sarah Palin's daughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Proud to see the real adults are finally back in charge.
Bush's abstinence education has been an abject failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Seriously, it's almost too good to be true...
A government that enacts policies that actually work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. And aren't policies based on a re-election campaign
Geared at invigorating a right-wing base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Free condom distribution in these countries is REAL COMPASSION. Anything short of that
in any public health program is completely irresponsible. Of course, "completely irresponsible" and "total lack of accountability" are the two best descriptors of the bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh thank gahd. A reality-based policy.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXDemGal Donating Member (600 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Jeebus...ya mean they're gonna actually do The Right Thing
and something that has a good chance of stopping the spread of HIV?? So glad we soon will have an administration that's living in The Real World.

Yes we can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Obama is rather advanced on this issue.
He co-sponsored a bill in the Senate with Olympia Snowe to increase funding for microbicide research which explores new prevention options, espcially for women where condom negotiation cannot be part of the conversation with their partners.

His HIV/AIDS program is going to be one of the best we've seen in many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's great news.
I'm so looking forward to getting the ball rolling on turning back Bush's idiotic policies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Occasionally, I would get some negative feedback for showing some bias during my workshops.
But facts are facts, so any Rethugs in the audience can suck it if their sensitive feelings were hurt anytime I'd emphasize Obama's advanced knowledge surrounding HIV/AIDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. Looks like Ryan White Funding will be in good hands for the next 8 years!
Now that some REALITY will be thrown into any decision making about it's funding.
This was my main argument with the 2 repubs who I work with at our HIV/AIDS clinic when they told me who they supported in the election..our clinic is funded by RW, most all of our patients have it as their primary source of payment for their medical care, and OUR PAYCHECKS come from RW funding...how the HELL can you support the (repub) party that will most likely strip the funding down even further??? Where in the hell are these patients going to turn to if they lose their funding???? Usually all I got in return was a blank look and a shrug.

http://www.advocate.com/exclusive_detail_ektid63934.asp?page=3

Ryan White has essentially been flat-funded since the year 2000. Though representatives from the Obama campaign promised increases, they did not commit to a dollar amount. “We want to make sure we work with Congress to come up with the right number as we go forward,” said Neera Tanden, the Obama campaign's domestic policy director.

Tanden added that increased funding would help limit the extent to which rural areas with an emerging epidemic have to compete for money with urban areas that already have a large population of persons living with AIDS. “We don't need to have this divisive strategy of pitting one area against another. We should add additional funding,” she said.

Another point surrogates emphasized was Obama’s focus on using a “science-based” approach to fighting the epidemic rather than relying on abstinence-only education to decrease infection rates.

“With all of the billions of dollars that have been given to HIV/AIDS prevention around the world,” DeGette said of the Bush administration’s international efforts, “most of that money has been given to, in the past, religious organizations that will not give condoms out. Now that just isn't going to work.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. OMG! Policy based upon reality! Can we still take it? Have we forgotten how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC