Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President-elect Obama is warning Dems against "grudges" against Sen. Joe Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 08:53 AM
Original message
President-elect Obama is warning Dems against "grudges" against Sen. Joe Lieberman
Breaking: : President-elect Obama is warning Dems against "grudges" against Sen. Joe Lieberman, who caucuses with Ds but campaigned for John McCain. Top Obama aide Robert Gibbs tells Politico: "We aren't going to referee decisions about who should or should not be a committee chair. President-elect Obama looks forward to working with anyone of any party to move the country forward. We'd be happy to have Sen. Lieberman caucus with the Democrats. We don't hold any grudges."

http://www.politico.com/politico44/

Looks like Obama is a bigger man than most. If HE can forgive and forget, I think it's time for some of you around here to chillout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nope.
But he is, of course, free to pursue his method of governing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't Lieberman 'mentor' Obama when Obama first came to the senate?
There may be a personal history behind this.

Anyone know if the story of Obama's connection with Lieberman is true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. True...to an extent.
All new Senators are shown the ropes by fellow Senators but it is not a Mr. Miyagi kind of thing.

Secondly, any personal history appears to be a one-way street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. yes, type "lieberman was Obama's mentor" into google
and see what comes up. this was brought up often when Obama was supporting Lieberman over Lamont in the CT DEM primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
41. Didn't much of the Dem leadership support Lieberman over Lamont in the primary?
Edited on Tue Nov-11-08 11:40 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
Which candidate supported Lamont over Lieberman in the the primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. When you get intot he senate they assign you someone to show you the ropes,
and he got stuck with holy joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Lieberman was telling people Obama asked him to be his
mentor. back when Obama was campaiging for Lieberman against Lamont in the CT DEM primary I found that comment when i googled because people like you kept claiming Obama had no choice. Lieberman says otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. so whats the point? i for one am glad you're so bitter about Obama winning. I know you can't stand
him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just because Obama forgives him it doesn't mean I have to
Fuck Lieberman and I hope the people of Connecticut does not forgive him either!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. That was my expectation from Obama and I think he is right
Obama is not a wimp - just a smart guy who knows what he wants to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
37. Agreed. I'd add though that Joe Lieberman better be very careful
about how reads Obama's actions here. Obama is not a pushover and Joe better understand that. I'm betting that Obama just put the carnation in the lapel of Joe's rogue political adventures. Joe will tow the line or he can kiss everything goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. In other words, strip him of his chairmanship if you want
But the decision to leave the caucus has to be up to Lieberman himself.

And, regardless, when it is over...it is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. it's called "keeping your friends close . . . and your enemies closer" . . .
besides, Lieberman will owe Obama big time if he keeps his chairmanship . . . I imagine there will come a time when he'll want to collect on the debt . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Holy Joe doesn't believe in paying his debts.
If he did, he would never have questioned the loyalty to this country of a man who campaigned for him during a difficult primary in 2006. Nor would he have campaigned for repubs around the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Bingo! In other words, we might need him in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. "WE AREN'T going to referee decisions about who should or...
SHOULD NOT be a committee chair". In other words, it's up to harry reid and joe lieberman as to what lieberman's future in the senate will be. Couldn't have been made any more clearer.

I wanted him stripped of everything. I've decided to compromise because of PE Obama's more than magnanimous gesture to joe on this. Strip him of his HLS chair and let joe decide if he wants to caucus with the dems. joe doesn't answer to me, he's gonna have to answer to his constituents in CT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. When I'm President, I'll be magnanimous
but I'm not. So fuck Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. I haven't disagreed much with Obama since he won the election but on this I will.
I disagree with him because this isn't just about his campaign and the subversive message Holy Joe tried to spread about him. It's about splitting the American people into 'patriots' and 'traitors'. Holy Joe's message was clear, 'Either support McCain or support the terrorist' and that's a message that has no place in the Democratic party or the public domain.

I support removing LIEberman's committee chairs and then letting him decide who he wants to caucus with. Anything less is a betrayal to the American people who have rejected Holy Joe's extremist, and cynical, outlook on who is and is not a patriot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. I agree wholeheartedly
Additionally, we have just come off a 8 year nightmare of the President telling Congress what to do, and Congress being too lockstep or too wimpy to stand up for own powers and responsibilities.

Simply put, this is not Obama's call.

He has put in his two cents, now leave it alon and let the Senate Democrats handle it. It is an internal Senate matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. I see your point, but Clinton & Biden said some pretty horrible things too
and Biden ended up being his VP!

That said, Lieberman has been a jackass for years now and I really don't want him in the party. I hope someone takes his seat soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. It's one thing to question someone's experience, it's another to question their loyalty.
Yes, Clinton and Biden said some pretty nasty things about Obama's lack of experience and his ability to get things done. That's hardball politics and everyone expects it. Holy Joe, actually questioned Obama's patriotism and loyalty to the United States. He has taken a page from the limbaugh wing of the repub party, the wing of coulter and malkin, with their desire to not merely win but to annihilate the Democratic party. He stood by, and agreed with, palin as she implied that Obama was a terrorist because of his 'associations'.

This isn't about whether LIEberman is a jackass, Rahm Emanuel is a jackass but I support his appointment. This is about leaving someone who has attempted to assassinate the character of our President-elect in charge of one of the most powerful, and possibly dangerous, committees in the Senate. I don't trust Holy Joe in that position and I think others would be well advised to follow suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgh_dem Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. Have to read his statement more carefully
They are officially taking the position that they'd like Lieberman to continue to caucus with the Democratic Party (as often as he does...)

NOT that he should remain chair of Homeland Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. (hoping against hope this means removal from Homeland Committee chair)
or at the very least he gets a different committee. This one is too tied to the failed "Bush Doctrine".. it is counter to Obama's plan for that region..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Nothing else but removal from his HLS chair will do.....
as far as I'm concerned. Obama and reid have both made it clear to him they want him to caucus with the dems, that's actually more than he deserves. The ball is in lieberman's court. It will be interesting to see how he reacts, if this is in fact the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Lieberman said that is unacceptable to him.
But I think he would take that deal. What else could he have going for him? The GOP surely has made some sort of offer already but it certainly would not include chairing any committee, what with the Republicans being banished to the wilderness and everything. And Joe would be keenly interested in keeping his Congressional seniority with Democrats, with its accompanying perks that his ego craves.

I'm trying to keep an open mind here but I don't see how we can let Lieberman continue in the Senate just the same as before. Take away his HS chair, and hopefully don't let him chair any committee. Then the decision will be up to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgh_dem Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
36. Yup, I see this as calling Lieberman's bluff (politely)
I believe we saw this move repeatedly through the campaign, where PRESIDENT-ELECT! Obama chose the high road, while being fully aware that the folks on the low road were about to plow into a Coyote/Roadrunner 'Danger!' sign and go over a cliff. After the inevitable, we saw PRESIDENT-ELECT! Obama reach a hand out to the smooshed pile of Coyote fur, saying 'Shame about that cliff. Ready to help me fix this country now?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
14. Punishing Lieberman would make a GOP martyr of him. Joe would love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, God forbid any of us should hold a grudge against a guy who helped sell Bush's war,...
Edited on Tue Nov-11-08 09:13 AM by JHB
...actively campaigned against fellow Democrats, and generally aided the people and party that have been doggedly wrecking this country.

Why should we hold a grudge? It's not like anything serious was involved, eh? :sarcasm:


Look, Obama is the guy calling the shots on this and he's shown plenty of savvy, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now. But I really hope this is a lot of smiley-face PR and he has Lieberman on a short leash -- any more bullshit from Joe and he's going to feel it.

I really hope that's the case, because if not this is Obama's Big Mistake #1, and will be biting him in the ass for years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. It's not a grudge. It would be one thing if LIEberman just gave lukewarm
support to McCain. It is completely different to be out on the campaign trail on the stage with McCain trying to bring down the Democrats, President and all the other races that would be affected. And this guy wants his job back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. "We aren't going to referee decisions about who should or should not be a committee chair."
I take that to mean don't kick him out of the caucus, but his committee chair is up to others. I can deal with that. Take his chair and let him caucus with us. If he behaves maybe he can earn it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. Let Obama be a bigger man: It's his job. I'll chill out when I
fucking well feel like. And in Liebertoad's case, that won't be for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. Lieberman is a shark. If Obama wants to swim with him, fine. NOT me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. Kill LIEberman with kindness. I wonder if he feels like an ass yet
for turning on Dems and siding with Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiales Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
28. Lieberman is simply an attention whore.
Obama is simply saying that we need to quit feeding Lieberman's oversized ego. The fact that Obama won is proof enough that Joe is irrelevant, now Joe just needs to recognize it. He'll likely not be back in his Homeland Chairmanship - let him fade into obscurity, but don't let him martyr himself out of the caucus. Every Senator in the caucus is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. This is the correct answer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. Sorry. Obama's always been too cozy to Joe
for my tastes, and this is just what I expect from the Seante club mentality. Obama has said many nice things about Joe, and added snark about Joe's critics.
And I don't see it as being a bigger man, I see it as being typically political and craven, I see it as an unwillingness to see accountability for those in high places. He's wrong, and he's following insider rules. Same old same old.
I just don't see it as you do at all. Far from it. Far. Gold star for Joe. Because he is entitled to his position? How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. Really, oh since you say it, it must be true, but even so provide a
shred of evidence that Obama has, as you claim, "added snark about Joe's critics".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
34. It is not Obama's place to get in the middle of this - his statement is appropriate.
I don't have a problem with what he's said. Let the Senate leaders handle the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mscuedawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
35. Good luck with that one in Connecticut...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
38. Obama has a right to his opinion, just like each of us do. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
40. The President elect is in a better position to forgive
But people on DU remember what Lieberman did and he shouldn't be given a free pass for supporting the opposing Presidential candidate. Obama took no real position on the committee chair, letting it be Lieberman's doing if he bolts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
42. I hold grudges! don't think Lieb should head any committee


he smirks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC