Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi Team Hints at Progressive Shift

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 11:49 AM
Original message
Pelosi Team Hints at Progressive Shift
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Pelosi-Team-Hints-at-Progr-by-Steven-Leser-081113-467.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Steven Leser

The Obama team isn't the only National political leadership team undergoing a transition. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is reorganizing the House Leadership team to include almost exclusively progressive members.

As Reported at The Hill (www.thehill.com):

(Rahm) Emanuel is being replaced by current Democratic Caucus Vice Chairman John Larson (Conn.), who, while well-liked and generally respected within the caucus, is regarded as far more liberal than Emanuel. And Larson’s replacement as vice chairman is expected to be Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.), a former Congressional Hispanic Caucus chairman who leans even further to the left than Larson.


Becerra, who is now assistant to the Speaker, was the only member of the Democratic leadership to vote against the $700 billion financial rescue bill twice, claiming it “fell short of embodying the elements of an economic recovery package that we need for taxpayers, workers, small businesses and homeowners.”


With Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen (Md.) poised to remain in his post for a second cycle and possibly assume some of Becerra’s present duties as assistant to the Speaker, centrists are privately worrying that they will be less represented at next year’s leadership table than they were in the 110th Congress.

---------------------------

This shift is an interesting action by a Speaker who had come under serious criticism from the Progressive wing of the party. Progressives were upset by Pelosi's refusal to attempt to impeach Bush and Cheney, her refusal to use the power of the purse to try to stop the Iraq war and by other actions that made it seem that Speaker Pelosi was trying to act in an excessively bipartisan manner.

While not widely reported in the national press, Progressives were sufficiently upset by Pelosi' first term as Speaker that Cindy Sheehan ran against Pelosi in the 2008 General Election and managed to get over 17% of the vote, a strong showing of support by a third party candidate against a sitting House Speaker. Sheehan's measure of support is even more striking when one considers that she was not afforded the possibility of debating Pelosi and was largely ignored by her opponent.

While the team member changes will be embraced by Progressives and other Liberals, it is sure to draw fire from those on the ideological right. Conservative talking heads are eager to try to paint the incoming Democratic Controlled Congress and Executive as 'too Liberal'. Rush Limbaugh is already trying to say that the recession is Obama's fault because of business and finance's fear of Obama's ideas. While other conservative pundits and talking heads aren't so obviously jumping the gun, they are preparing this line of attack for use as early as will be reasonably credible.

Such attacks won't be of much use if the Democrats are successful at reversing the country's economic problems, but if the problems linger or become more severe as we approach election day in 2010 and 2012, you can be sure the "out of touch' and 'too Liberal' attacks will regularly roll off the tongues of every Republican pundit and candidate for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Less hinting. More doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. In the immortal words of...
Ken Kesey, "You're either on the bus or you're off the bus." GET ON THE BUS, Dems. The country can handle being progressive. In fact, we WANT it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Article fails to mention Hoyer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The original article does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. And that is why I wrote 'almost' exclusively Progressive members
Without Hoyer, I would have omitted the almost. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Glad to see it. Progressive legislation will help the economy.
Luckily middle class tax cuts do stimulate the economy.

Luckily fast-tracking alternative energy development will create jobs and thus further stimulate the economy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Arghhh!!!!!!
There are so many Palin threads that when I read your subject title, my mind inserted 'Palin' instead of 'Pelosi' & I thought, "What the fuck? First the dimwit says she would accept a position in Obama's administration & now she claims she's going progressive?"

Time to use the 'hide thread' feature!
:crazy: :eyes: :crazy: :eyes: :crazy: :eyes:

That said, thank you for this article. It's time we proudly took back the word 'liberal.' Progressive is an ok word, but I've heard numerous repubs claim that we ourselves are so afraid of the word liberal, that we've come up with the word progressive to avoid using the word liberal. I think more people are liberal than they think, but they have been conditioned to fear the word liberal. It's time to educate the American public on exactly what liberal values mean & it starts with dems not shrinking from the word.

===
A Day in the Life of Joe Conservative

http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Rec/rec.music.artists.springsteen/2006-07/msg00285.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sooooo,
Does that mean Nancy has plans to replace herself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. LOL
You are baaaaaaad. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. There will be all kinds of input. Which mindset prevails remains to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'll believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Kicked for the Thursday late afternoon crowd
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. If the Obama admin wants to get things done it needs to shift to Progressive.
Most Americans are progressive in their views whether they identify themselves as progressive or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Are you basing that on anecdotal or empirical evidence?
If empirical, can you provide a link?

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC