Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin's supposed continent confusion the work of a hoaxer.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:09 PM
Original message
Palin's supposed continent confusion the work of a hoaxer.
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 12:10 PM by Occam Bandage
A fascinating NYT article on a person who's fooled the media multiple times this campaign.

It was among the juicier post-election recriminations: Fox News Channel quoted an unnamed McCain campaign figure as saying that Sarah Palin did not know that Africa was a continent.

Who would say such a thing? On Monday the answer popped up on a blog and popped out of the mouth of David Shuster, an MSNBC anchor. “Turns out it was Martin Eisenstadt, a McCain policy adviser, who has come forward today to identify himself as the source of the leaks,” Mr. Shuster said.

Trouble is, Martin Eisenstadt doesn’t exist. His blog does, but it’s a put-on. The think tank where he is a senior fellow — the Harding Institute for Freedom and Democracy — is just a Web site. The TV clips of him on YouTube are fakes.

And the claim of credit for the Africa anecdote is just the latest ruse by Eisenstadt, who turns out to be a very elaborate hoax that has been going on for months. MSNBC, which quickly corrected the mistake, has plenty of company in being taken in by an Eisenstadt hoax, including The New Republic and The Los Angeles Times. Now a pair of obscure filmmakers say they created Martin Eisenstadt to help them pitch a TV show based on the character. But under the circumstances, why should anyone believe a word they say?

They say the blame lies not with them but with shoddiness in the traditional news media and especially the blogosphere.

“That’s a really good question,” one of the two, Eitan Gorlin, said with a laugh.

“With the 24-hour news cycle they rush into anything they can find,” said Mr. Mirvish, 40.

Mr. Gorlin, 39, argued that Eisenstadt was no more of a joke than half the bloggers or political commentators on the Internet or television.

An MSNBC spokesman, Jeremy Gaines, explained the network’s misstep by saying someone in the newsroom received the Palin item in an e-mail message from a colleague and assumed it had been checked out. “It had not been vetted,” he said. “It should not have made air.”

But most of Eisenstadt’s victims have been bloggers, a reflection of the sloppy speed at which any tidbit, no matter how specious, can bounce around the Internet. And they fell for the fake material despite ample warnings online about Eisenstadt, including the work of one blogger who spent months chasing the illusion around cyberspace, trying to debunk it.

The hoax began a year ago with short videos of a parking valet character, who Mr. Gorlin and Mr. Mirvish said was the original idea for a TV series.

Soon there were videos showing him driving a car while spouting offensive, opinionated nonsense in praise of Rudolph W. Giuliani. Those videos attracted tens of thousands of Internet hits and a bit of news media attention.

When Mr. Giuliani dropped out of the presidential race, the character morphed into Eisenstadt, a parody of a blowhard cable news commentator.

Mr. Gorlin said they chose the name because “all the neocons in the Bush administration had Jewish last names and Christian first names.”

Eisenstadt became an adviser to Senator John McCain and got a blog, updated occasionally with comments claiming insider knowledge, and other bloggers began quoting and linking to it. It mixed weird-but-true items with false ones that were plausible, if just barely.

The inventors fabricated the Harding Institute, named for one of the most scorned presidents, and made Eisenstadt a senior fellow.

It didn’t hurt that a man named Michael Eisenstadt is a real expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and is quoted in the mainstream media. The real Mr. Eisenstadt said in an interview that he was only dimly aware of the fake one, and that his main concern was that people understood that “I had nothing to do with this.”

Before long Mr. Gorlin and Mr. Mirvish had produced a short documentary on Martin Eisenstadt, supposedly for the BBC, posted in several parts on YouTube.

In June they produced what appeared to be an interview with Eisenstadt on Iraqi television promoting construction of a casino in the Green Zone in Baghdad. Then they sent out a news release in which he apologized. Outraged Iraqi bloggers protested the casino idea.

Among the Americans who took that bait was Jonathan Stein, a reporter for Mother Jones. A few hours later Mr. Stein put up a post on the magazine’s political blog, with the title “Hoax Alert: Bizarre ‘McCain Adviser’ Too Good to Be True,” and explained how he had been fooled.
In July, after the McCain campaign compared Senator Barack Obama to Paris Hilton, the Eisenstadt blog said “the phone was burning off the hook” at McCain headquarters, with angry calls from Ms. Hilton’s grandfather and others. A Los Angeles Times political blog, among others, retold the story, citing Eisenstadt by name and linking to his blog.

Last month Eisenstadt blogged that Samuel J. Wurzelbacher, Joe the Plumber, was closely related to Charles Keating, the disgraced former savings and loan chief. It wasn’t true, but other bloggers ran with it.

Among those taken in by Monday’s confession about the Palin Africa report was The New Republic’s political blog. Later the magazine posted this atop the entry: “Oy — this would appear to be a hoax. Apologies.”

But the truth was out for all to see long before the big-name take-downs. For months sourcewatch.org has identified Martin Eisenstadt as a hoax. When Mr. Stein was the victim, he blogged that “there was enough info on the Web that I should have sussed this thing out.”

And then there is William K. Wolfrum, a blogger who has played Javert to Eisenstadt’s Valjean, tracking the hoaxster across cyberspace and repeatedly debunking his claims. Mr. Gorlin and Mr. Mirvish praised his tenacity, adding that the news media could learn something from him.

“As if there isn’t enough misinformation on this election, it was shocking to see so much time wasted on things that didn’t exist,” Mr. Wolfrum said in an interview.

And how can we know that Mr. Wolfrum is real and not part of the hoax?

Long pause. “Yeah, that’s a tough one.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/arts/television/13hoax.html?_r=3&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think they are just trying to muddy the waters , it was NOT the original source
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 12:16 PM by ErinBerin84
Carl Cameron from Fox (who I know is a sketchy source, but whatever) and Kelly O'Donnell have both said that the Africa story came from aides. Then the fake McCain advisor blog came out with a story "Ok, it was me, I was the source", which MSNBC reported on in a fluffy way even though they said during the segment that the blog was probably fake. The original source came from aides though, whether or not it was true, Carl confirmed that he didn't get the story from a blog...and even though Kelly is a shill, I trust her when she said that aides told her the story. Ben Smith actually did a story this morning trying to claim that the blog was the original source, and he had to issue a correction to his article. Huffington Post had to change their article too.

I hope that Republicans don't try to Dan Rather this situation and blame it on David Shuster, because the producer did not vet it and he said during the segment that he was pretty sure the blog was fake, and confirmed it literally two minutes later. I could see them trying to pin this on "liberal MSNBC", when Fox was the first one who reported on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. But it's nice of that liberal media to help spread the disinformation.
:P ;)

However, each time I've heard Moosolini speak, the thought of her believing that Africa is "a country" seems more and more plausible within my belief system. In other words, she's clearly not the brightest GOP Governor in the USA. In fact, Arnold Schwarzenegger genuinely presents himself as "a Rhodes Scholar" when contrasted with Sarah Palin during ANY of her numerous recent media screeds. At least he entertains a cogent thought process and I can follow his rationale. Palin's M$M interviews? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Shuster is one of the few good reporters on MSNBC left, despite Pimp-gate
and Republicans already hate him for the dead soldier thing that he used on Marsha Blackburn when he was filling in for Tucker , when there was some question over which district it was. I just hope they don't try to blame this on him.

And the segment focused more on this as the lead in, like their "Did Obama give Hillary Clinton the finger???" story from months ago, when during the actual segment, they said "no, not really."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, no, no! The hoax is not about her confusion regarding Africa
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 12:21 PM by DrToast
The hoax is concerning this guy as the original source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. yeah, I think Republicans
will try to blame this on MSNBC and use it as an attempt to exonerate Palin , but the fake blog post about Africa came about a week AFTER Cameron's reporting, and O'Donnell admitted that she heard the same thing later. In the Huffington Post article, they printed a statement by Carl Cameron that he didn't use the blog as a source. MSNBC wasn't even seriously reporting this, just discussed the blog with strategists and he said that he was pretty sure the blog was fake. I hope that Shuster doesn't get Rather-ed for this, because even mentioning the blog was the work of the producer who didn't vet it, according to the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. You cant hoax stupid.
Just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. i think she really didn't know-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Someone is pulling another "Rather"
disinformation campaign.

Just like the "Palin banned books" story from early on.

Only this one did get Shuster and a few other MSM outlets, unlike the banned books.

Carl Cameron reports on Fox that someone leaked that Palin doesn't know the membership of NAFTA, nor that Africa is a continent.

HIS sources are probably inside the campaign. He reports it on Fox. Everyone else reports that Fox is reporting...

Now this "fake" Eisenstadt posts on a blog that HE is responsible for the leaks. Shuster and others fall for it, only to be embarrassed later to find out that the source is a fake. Leaving everyone with the impression that the most damaging stories about how stupid Sarah is are also "wrong". But they weren't.

It's yet another disinformation campaign to discredit the media.

Carl Cameron has a real source, someone who swears that Palin IS that stupid. And it wasn't a blog, it's a real person.

Rather fell for the fake (provably) memo on TANG and lost his job over it.

The book banning story was also a plant. Yes, she tried to have some books banned. In particular, the one about Gays written by a resident of Wasilla. No, she didn't try to have Harry Potter banned. The list that was circulated was a fake. The story goes that she tried the book banning within days of becoming mayor. Harry Potter wasn't even published yet. KO and others have tried to make it out that because she was mayor when the first four Harry Potter's were published, the list could still be accurate and therefore her statement that Harry Potter wasn't even published is wrong. Sarah is correct, KO should have not reported it. But the TRUTH is that she did try to ban books from the library, it happened when she first took over as mayor and started trying to replace the town staff (librarian, police chief) if they didn't "show support". But the list circulated is wrong. It's a clever "gotcha" disinformation campaign.

And this one about Eisenstadt is as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I was really surprised when Kelly O'Donnell said the other
day that aides told her the Palin Africa story too...I always thought she was kind of a Mccain shill, so when Chris asked her "Kelly, what reporting do you have on this? Is there really any indication that Palin did not KNOW that Africa was a continent?!" Kelly paused and then said "Aides did tell me that she didn't know Africa was a continent...but these same aides also gave her credit for things she WAS willin to do, like sit through long briefings. They didn't think she did not have the capacity to learn, butshe did not come into the situation bringing a lot of knowledge on issues." Even though she tried to put a better spin on it, I didn't expect her to say that aides told her the story too. So they told it to someone in addition to Fox's Cameron. I blame the producer, at least Shuster had the instict to say during the segment that he thought the blog was fake. The originators of the blog also said that they never talked to Cameron and he didn't get the story from the blog post.

(from the Huffington Post)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/13/martin-eisenstadt-the-man_n_143547.html

filmmakers confirmed to TVNewser Thursday:

"To be very clear, no, we were not the source for Carl Cameron and never spoke to him," Mirvish tells TVNewser. "We took credit for his anonymous sourcing. If they were going to be cowards, then we figured we may as well step in."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC