Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

question on Ohio being called at around 15% in

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 08:57 PM
Original message
question on Ohio being called at around 15% in
I assume the early exit polls must have showed Obama with a comfortable lead well over the 4% he won by. The original was too early to call when the polls close. Does anyone know the margin they must have to characterize it as such. It still seems fishy to me that the final numbers must have been much closer than the original exit polling......Don't get me wrong I'd take any margin even one vote and be happier than shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. The results probably included Republiscum strongholds and when compared to the polling data
they knew McCain was toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. They use a variety of methods
but one big thing is that there has to be a 95% CI showing Obama winning vs. McCain to call on only polls. That would have to be about a 6 or 7% lead to call on only polls. If returns tend to confirm the polls then the call can be made with less of a lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not sure how they do it, but they try to be within 3 standard deviations of being right
Somehow with the exit polling data they get they figure out if they pass the three standard deviation mark, and call it if they meet that requirement.

When the results start coming in though, I think they start to more look at where crucial swing counties went, and what areas have and haven't reported yet and how they're likely to vote based on the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Experts can tell by looking at partial results from two or three counties
4% is huge.

These population effects are strata. They don't shift substantially. They looked at turnout and results in a strong McCain county and results in a middle Obama county and probably could have called it earlier.

It's not that complicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Even with 15%, you could tell McCain was underperforming in the GOP strongholds
that a GOP candidate needs to dominate to win the state. They looked at W's performance there as a baseline. McCain underperformed Bush by a wide margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I just had to watch election night over again tonight on tape
and I noticed Obama had about a 200,000 vote lead with 1% in from early voting I'm guessing. A lead which remained constant the whole night, would this help call it earlier also? Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not really.
Early voting reporting is pretty erratic. You really don't know if the initial 1% was early voting, or if it was just results from election day voting from quick reporting precincts.

When they saw enough data from Cincinatti, Dayton, Cleveland and Western Ohio, they had enough data points to realize that McCain was underperforming Bush by a large margin - and thus they called the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Much thanks to all who responded, been thinking about this all week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC