Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is leaking all this inside info? (e.g. Hillary SoS consideration)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:10 PM
Original message
Who is leaking all this inside info? (e.g. Hillary SoS consideration)
Is this a deliberate thing or is Rahm already "going rogue"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's interesting is, as Rachel just said, lately his camp has been leaking
like a sieve. It sure wasn't like that during the campaign. I wonder, too -- if it's a deliberate leak, or a REAL leak.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary's camp
Obama has been very good about being low key.

W/ that said .... hell yes good idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, there weren't really any leaks during the campaign
So logically, it would be someone who came aboard after the election. And I guess that narrows down the suspect list considerably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my2sense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah - it's troubling to me
I'm wondering if there's already some mole within his circle. I hope they find the leak and plug it up soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would say
Someone in the "Clinton" camp! Kind of sounds like what was happening with the VP slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. You'd have to know Andrea's connections and her sources. Its reporters jobs to
try and find this stuff out.. Would they do this to Republicans if they knew that it was to be hush-hush? I don't know.. I cannot remember the Bush transition other than the whole.. they trashed the White House lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think it's being floated by wishful thinkers
Andrea Mitchell reported a ton of rumors during the primary campaign that turned out to be total bunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. they leaked strategically for the VP choices
Though, has anyone reported on this besides Andrea Mitchell, or is it all sourced back to her reporting? I remember her saying some sketchy things in the past, don't know if I always trust her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. The problem began with Rahm--maybe his wife or a close friend
of his is behind all the leaks?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. They're totally doing it on purpose.
They're too organized not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prostock69 Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I agree. They leak info to gauge the response from the public
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think this is one of those times
when the person who wants the job leaks the info in order to get the job. Remember the VP speculation?

Actually, I think she'd be great. If I were Obama, I'd certainly consider it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. thinking about it more
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 09:22 PM by ErinBerin84
I see more reason to leak the VP picks as a matter of strategy, so the public/media can vet them a little and get reaction ...what needs to be vetted about Kerry/Clinton/or Richardson? This confuses me. Ok, get the point about public reaction, but it's still weird to me.

Anywho, Did anyone else read that Larry might be out bc of reaction from womens groups, on the topic of treasury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is a natural consequence of talking to possible appointees.
The campaign was a very organized, from the top down, organization. They were in a position to contorl inside info. Now, we're post election, and they're talking to many people about many positions. The campaign insiders can only control who they talk to. They cannot control the bits of info that leak out because a scheduler tells a friend, who tells their mother, who sends NBC an email about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC