Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think Clinton should be SoS...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:51 AM
Original message
I think Clinton should be SoS...
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 10:04 AM by mckeown1128
She and Richardson are the two most qualified for the job.. and I kind of like the whole... not being a yes man to Obama thing. I like the fact that he is thinking about appointing people that don't always agree with him. That's just my two and a half cents...


On edit: just to explain my position further. Clinton is qualified because of the clout she has in the world. She will easily be able to work with other leaders. For those of you worried about her positions during the primary, I believe she wasn't too far the right. I think she was running a DLCish campaign...so she was punctuating the more right leaning positions. I believe she is much more progressive in her actual opinions than some give her credit for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with Clinton
after all these years with an ineffective Kindasleezy - its time to get a SoS that can actually accomplish something - besides sniffing out great sales on shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. How is she qualified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'd like to know also. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Didn't you hear? She is the one qualified to take the 3.a.m. call.
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 10:02 AM by Skwmom
Do you think Bill Clinton will be able resist crowing about how Obama needed Hillary to take that call?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I also want to know the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Polarizing (doesn't help unite this country), he won't be able to get rid of her once he gives her
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 10:01 AM by Skwmom
the position (which puts WAY to much power in her hands), and it will make it look like the third Clinton term and that he is unqualified which is why he needs the Clintons (they are already running the 3 a.m. ad).

Make the Clintons special envoys. That way if they try to undercut him or do their own thing, he can just stop using them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why qualified?? Her foreign policy outlook was almost neocon
Historians have uniformly given Kerry the nod regarding quals as SOS.
Other choices are based more on political considerations even though all are qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. I would prefer that she stays in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. If she does take the job, I think Eliot Spitzer should take her Senate seat.
He can be appointed by the Gov. I don't care about the sex scandal. He was Wall Street's sheriff and they took him out. We need someone as tough and knowledgeable as Spitzer to help straighten out the financial mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. Here are my concerns:
1)Her comments regarding Iran. I don't know if she really meant all the tough war talk, or if she was just trying to eliminate the myth that women are too weak to be commander in chief... but I don't like comments like "Obliterate Iran." I just don't. I want peace to be the first option, not war!

2)Their different views on diplomacy

3)The crowd she surrounded herself with during the primaries. I don't know if it's just that Obama's team was perfect, or her team was a group of epic failures, but I'm just concerned that her judgment in picking qualified allies might be slightly off.

4)Bill Clinton--the unknown variable. Love the guy, but he sucks the air out of the room. I don't want him to undermine Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Richardson is the most qualified. And Kerry is far more qualified than Hillary.
Not sure why anyone would think she is qualified. Being the wife of a former president doesn't qualify you for anything,
as her health care fuckup amply demonstrated. And let's not forget her ridiculous lies about sniper fire and helping broker
the Irish Peace accord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Objectively, why is Richardson MORE qualified that Kerry. SOS is not 'negotiator" but needs to
develop foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Read his resumé. The answer is obvious.
The only caveat with Richardson is he might be embarrassed during Senate hearings if Republicans decide to dig up dirt
on his rumored affairs. That said, I'd be very happy with Kerry as SoS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. I think it's a horrible idea...
But that's just me.

Oh, wait, no it isn't just me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC