Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary as SoS: Why in the world not?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:12 AM
Original message
Hillary as SoS: Why in the world not?
I see many people here opposing it but I don't know why... any valid reasons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reflexive hatred for the name "Clinton."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We sure eat our own, don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mscuedawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Youve noticed that around here too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yeah. I like Bubba. I like 'Bama, I like Hillary. I like Biden. I like Richardson...
I think we have a surfeit of talent on our side of the aisle and don't think we need to eat our own nor worship any of them mindlessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think she's more cut out to be attny Gen. Besides, he needs someone he's completely...
comfortable with to be SoS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Because she's a war-hawk. The exact opposite of what you want your head diplomat to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. That's a lie that's beaten to death by people who refuse to know what she's about
and by people who infest this site and are here for nothing more than the purpose of causing divisiveness by bashing the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. The person who threatened to obliterate Iran is not a war-hawk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. it's funny watching her fans live in make-believe world...
She's a smart person. A competent person. But a peace-seeking person she is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. It's pathetic watching her haters continue to divide this place
but enjoy yourselves if that's what makes you happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Typical reply that doesn't address the substance of a fact-based objection.
But enjoy yourself if that's what makes you happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Certainly she is a DLCer and the DLC has promoted international "intervention"
If as SOS (Hillary, orwho ever that is) follows the Obama foreign policy objectives it really doesn't matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. She's not the one kissing Colin Powell on the lips, or Sam Nunn. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kosovo.
:(
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Wouldn't Wes Clark be better?
Speaking of Kosovo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Other than Kosovo, what experience does he have that works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. because she would be better in HEALTH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. It helps to label his admin as the third Clinton Term (something they've already been pushing).
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 11:16 AM by Skwmom
It will NOT help unite this country (the Clintons are not liked OR trusted by MANY on the left AND right), once appointed she will have a tremendous amount of power to do her own thing b/c there is NO WAY Obama will be able to get rid of her, and it fuels the meme that he is unqualified (she will answer the 3 a.m. call for him).

I voted and worked for change. I didn't vote and work for more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. I concur with Skwmom 100%. Some of us are just plain over the Clintons (and I
worked 60 hours+ per week in '92 to get Bill elected).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Because she's not the best choice.
None of these senators are.

We need new blood. People with other experience besides politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. What qualifications does she have for the position?
How is she more qualified than Bill Richardson, who was an ambassador and has extensive diplomatic experience? How is she more qualified than John Kerry, who's served for many years as a member of the Foreign Relations Committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. She isn't qualified?
She voted for the war in Iraq?

She lied about her trip to Kosovo?

She is a hawk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. I guess the questio is, why? Besides coming in second, what foreign policy creds does she have
that are better than so many other candidates for the job? I think she has some major baggage, also, such as threatening to obliterate Iran and a history of talking tough on Iran. It would seem to hobble her ability to do anything in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. You should review the debate films and refresh your memory
on how Hill admonished Obama for his view of how he would relate to other countries. She was at opposite ends of the pole from him. SOS? It just doesn't seem like a fit. Remember Hill sold the war like a rethuglican trooper. Bomb first, talk later. That is why I do not want her as SOS. We need a SOS that believes in diplomacy first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. Lots of good reasons, but posting them here would serve little to no constructive purpose. Move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. Becuz she's tha evul anti-Christ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. DLC
'nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornfedyank Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
21. richardson is a better choice
just because he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. Inappropriate, blustery comments like "obliterate Iran" should disqualify her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. Poor leadership skills.
Gaffe machine. Insulted a number of foreign countries. Views on racial minorities.

Shall I go on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'm tired of "The Clintons" sucking all the political oxygen out of the media. It's time for
HRC to settle into being the best Senator New York State could ask for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. the same 'leaks' happened when Obama was choosing his VP
they are obvious efforts to build public pressure on Obama to pick Hillary by riling up her supporters.
It is a wholly bullshit tactic.

If Obama chooses Hillary of his own will, he will be the one telling us, not leaks.

Anything else is just an attempt to influence his decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our fourth quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. I actually think she'd be much better as AG, Health or even Education
I think she'd be really great in the above three cabinet positions. She's had a proven background and experience in all three areas.

By contrast I think Kerry, Richardson, Holbrooke or someone like that should have State -someone with a foreign policy background. Bill Clinton would make an excellent SOS but unfortunately it would probably create a whole lot of unecessary controversy during the transition period that Obama doesn't need. Jimmy Carter would be another good choice but I'm guessing he's too old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
35. She's qualified but there are others who are more qualified
Generally the Secretary of State is picked from the ranks of people who are experts in foreign policy. Hillary knows foreign policy very well but I would hardly call her an expert. Then again, maybe if Obama picks her it will be because he has a good reason for bucking the conventional wisdom for picking a Secretary of State. After all, he is going to be the change President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. Giustra, Burkle...
And the money they gave to Bill for ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC