Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gov. Jennifer Granholm, born 1959, under consideration for SCOTUS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:14 PM
Original message
Gov. Jennifer Granholm, born 1959, under consideration for SCOTUS
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 11:14 PM by Unsane
she is the former AG of Michigan and former Assistant United States Attorney.

At 49, she would be the youngest member of the court, and could serve up to 30 years (putting her at 79).

http://www.freep.com/article/20081110/COL04/81110073/1008/news06
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. She is so sexy when she wears those glasses. I'm so attracted to her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. Go take a cold shower. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. Great reason to put her on the bench.
Seriously, she may be a really good pick.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #70
92. unintentional pun of the day
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
79. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
89. Uh oh, "Little Starbursts" alert!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #89
90. lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. She was the Editor in Chief of the Harvard
Civil Rights/Civil Liberties Law Review when I was a first year law student and staffer on that journal. Can't imagine that a former CRCL Editor wouldn't be precisely the sort of justice we need these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. 25 years ago? That doesn't tell us if she cares about civil liberties now. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. The CRCL review was the hardest left of all HLS journals
by a long shot, which was why I volunteered for it. She can't have drifted that far. Though I would welcome serious inspection of her views on things like the unitary executive and the "Patriot" act. Alls I'm sayin' is that she has some good precedents in her background, not that she'd deserve a free pass.

Peace, bro!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
82. (facepalm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #82
85. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ummm..."under consideration for SCOTUS" by the author of the article.
I don't think that counts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eryemil Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Please, universe if you allow this to happen I will be your bitch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
66. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I want someone with a record of supporting civil liberties, such as Russ Feingold.
I have no idea how Granhom feels about civil liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
65. i'm sure she's great
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I lived under Granholm. Take a good hard look at how MI is doing under her leadership.
Jobs......down.
Environmental concerns.....ignored.
Crime....WAY up.

Jennifer Granholm has been a failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I used to live in Michigan too...but I never really felt like the things
happening were really anything she could control. The automotive mess was just waiting to happen and the crime in Detroit is the fault of a lot of other issues. I always liked Jennifer. Be nice!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The people in Michigan don't seem to blame her for things
Its kind of weird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Her approval ratings are shit.
For a governor to be in the 30s is never good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Oh. I just remember her winning re-election big
If those are her approval ratings, she would be wise to take a position in the Administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. The last I saw had her at 37% in August.
It may have gone up, but I doubt they're above 50%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. I think it was 41-42 in late September early Ocatober
and her favorability was in the low 50s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. Nobody asked "me" - I blame her....
For a former AG, how in the world did she and cronies come up with a primary that Michigan's legislature declared unconstitional???

I could forgive her if she were a former cab driver, but .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. How in the world does a legislature declare something unconstitutional? That's for courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Don't ask me.....I only know what I read....
Look at this - it says "Michigan January 15 Primary Unconstitutional.."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/27/michigan-january-15-prima_n_93679.html

Take it up with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. Sorry, I get your point now
I wrote my first response too quickly saying it was the legislature, even misspelled the word, "unconstitutional," and I should have said the "courts."

Sharp eye, thanks for correction.

I still hold the view that Granholm should have known it would be unconstitutional because she was not formerly a cab driver, but the AG.

Supreme Court - nah.... If I were on the vetting committee who screens SC judge nominees (Leahy, Spector?), I would definitely call her on this. The MSC's decision seemed to have no effect on Mrs. Clinton either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Be nice about what? She's a failure. I dare you to go to the union members in Grand Rapids
and tell them to "be nice".

Go to Herman Miller and tell them to "be nice".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What did she do the union members?...maybe you can enlighten me..
I moved out of michigan after losing my job but I don't blame her. I blame the messed up economy and my company moving my job out of the country. I was telling you to be nice with a smiley face lightening things up...perhaps I'm in a better mood than you but there's no need to get nasty or dare me to do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. *crickets*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
34. She wasn't give a good hand to play though was she...
You think someone could have done better?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. hope you are kidding
After the mess Engler left the state in, and with a gerrymandered into office obstructionist right wing legislature?

By your way of measuring these things, the Obama administration is certain to be a failure as well, as the chickens come home to roost from the Bush era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. You're wrong about it being her fault
Our economy started going down in 2001, 2 years before her term started. Plus, the loss of jobs has been a result of poor federal trade policies that have devastated manufacturing in this country, on top of a collapsing US auto industry. How is she to blame for these problems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erinlough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
50. Engler did to Michigan what Bush has done to the US
and then Gov. Granholm came in. Obama faces much the same situation as she has. People have such short memories that I have no doubt he will face the same blame as she does some day in the future. As far as I'm concerned she has done a great job after the rape Michigan has had by Engler and the Republicans who stayed in the House and Senate. Huge contracts which have been a burden were inherited from Engler and then given to Granholm. We were declining in the last two years of his administration and people have already forgotten.....what a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #50
91. you're exactly right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
56. Those are right-wing talking points and are not correct.
Yes, jobs are down, but that relates to Republican control of the federal economy, not Granholm.

All areas of state government have had budget cuts, but environmental concerns have not been gutted. I deal with them and they are still there and visible.

I have not seen reports of crime being up, let alone way up. I live inside the city of Detroit and have not noticed this marked increase you call "way up".

I say she's a success, and repudiate your word: failure. The only reason she is painted as a failure is due to the money of DeVos and Blackwater goons from west Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamarama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
59. Well, if you live in Michigan, then you remember that fat, worthless, three-term fuck named Engler.
He left Gov. Granholm 12 years of garbage to clean up. She's a governor, not a goddess with magical powers.

Jennifer Granholm has done an outstanding job in working with the mess she was left to clean up, and anyone in Michigan ought to know that. How could anyone expect her to clean up 12 years of fuck ups in the six years she has been in office?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #59
80. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #59
84. agreed
Where is that asshole these days? I hated him so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Now that would be a sign of infinite wisdom coming from the Commander
in Waiting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
57. yeppers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Canadian thing
Would she be the first non-American born citizen to be placed on the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. There is nothing that seems to say you have to be a natural born citizen...
Madeline Albright was SoS and was naturalized
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You do not have to be a natural born citizen. The GOP has wanted Alex Kozinski on the Court
for a while now, and I believe he was born in Romania.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Yes
I know its constitutional however would she be the first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
61. Felix Frankfurter was born in Austria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. No, she would not be the first.
Felix Frankfurter was born in Austria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. I like the idea that Obama would choose someone young.
I think Justices Alito, Roberts and Thomas need some people that'll hang in as long as they will. Or longer. If she's not such great stuff as a Governor, maybe she's better at law than execution? Someone up-thread said Russ Feingold was a possibility.

I *heart* Feingold. Genuinely comes across as principled, re: Iraq war and how our campaigns are conducted and being the only guy to vote against the Patriot Act; I strongly suspect he was the only one to give it a good read and actually thnk about the consequences and respected the Constitution enough to say "no". He really impresses me. He's also pretty young and for the person upthread who finds Granholm hot, well...that should not be a consideration. Really.

Yeah. But, I think Russ is kind of hot. :) (Sorry, can't help it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. We have to think young. Whether it's her or someone else, we need to look at age...
...with our choice. We can't cave in on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Absolutely--the balance of the Court depends on it.
If we can call Bush smart about anything, it was in picking two Justices we'd be dealing with for a long time. I truly hope the article is right and Obama has the opportunity to maybe replace someone like Scalia. If he goes two terms, he very well might. I also think, based on what I know of Obama, he can truly make an informed decision about his choices.

I also don't wonder....very long term, if post-presidency, some future president isn't wondering if Obama should be like another Taft. You know? That would be awesome, and he would be just that capable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jemsan Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. You can't blame Jennifer Granholm for what's happening....
in Michigan now. Like Bill Maher said tonight the Ford family can't even run a football team!!! The big 3 have been a disaster for way longer than Granholm has been in office. She just has the privilege of presiding over the funeral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
88. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
23. Hope she gets appointed soon so that somebody else....
could run for gov of Michigan....

That "primary" we had makes me feel that our state's highest officials are thugs at worst, stupid at best....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
25. I like her so far. I'll have to look at her record, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
29. she would be a great choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
69. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
30. On the SCOTUS, 79 is young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our fourth quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
78. maybe some other time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. I think it's unlikely for her to be appointed to the Supreme Court
Granholm has never been a judge. This isn't necessarily an offical qualification but I think people would prefer someone with previous court experience. I do think she'll have some sort of position in the Obama administration. Granholm seems to be close to Obama/Biden. She played the Palin part for Biden's debate preparation. She was personally invited to the last president debate. She's also on Obama's economic advisory team and had a prominent seat next to Biden (who was next to Obama) at the meeting. I think she would great on the Supreme Court but I see some sort of other position coming her way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Was Earl Warren a judge before he was nominated to the Supreme Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Thanks to wikipedia, it doesn't appear he was
I'm not saying one has to have been a judge to be on Supreme Court. I just think a lot of people would prefer someone who has been a judge before (she would have to get Senate approval). I hope Obama does pick Granholm. First, it would allow her to stay in Michigan for a longer amount of time and finish more of her remaining term. Secondly, she would do a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. You don't have to have previous experience as a judge to become a justice.
Earl Warren was never a judge. And look at his record. He is one of the most influential men of the 20th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Some argue Warren's influence largely stemmed from the fact that he was a former executive.
I think Granholm could be a leader on the court.

We need progressive leaders in the federal judiciary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. I know
That's what I said. It's NOT a requirement but I think it's a qualification that many people have placed upon nominees on their own. If you asked someone, do you think a person should have had previous experience as judge to be a Supreme Court justice, most would yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Most people can't even NAME a Supreme Court justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. Maybe the people you associate with
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 12:17 AM by bamalib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. You mean my fellow law school classmates?
Smartass much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #64
74. I don't know what kind of law school you went to
I went to Bama and my classmates can name most, if not all, of the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #74
76. MY peers can. But my peers aren't who I'm talking about.
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 09:14 AM by Unsane
Notwithstanding your insistence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #49
83. Whoa - you might want to try hanging out in a *literate* crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #83
87. lolz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
40. Works for me he should only appoint women to bring equilirium to the court.
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 07:37 PM by cooolandrew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #40
77. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
52. Only 49! Yes, please! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #52
72. Too old! We need a 35 year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Unlikely. Most law school graduates are already 26-27 before they even begin their careers.
A person who is only 35 would be pretty inexperienced for a SCOTUS appointment.

I do support appointing said individual to a federal district court though, where they can be groomed etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
53. Granholm would be a good choice--a lasting impression on the court..
And I for one am tired of her being the pinata and scapegoat for the economic shitpile Michigan has become--it isn't her fault. And yes I live here in MI too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. Another Michigander chiming in. I agree with you 100%!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. I remember a governor named Earl Warren who turned into a pretty fine justice.
Granholm would be great on the Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. I love the idea of appointing former executives to the court.
They're used to leading.

God bless Ginsberg, Breyer, and Souter, but they aren't the "liberal lions" we need on the Court right now. You think Governor Granholm is going to be talked down by Scalia or Thomas? Yeah right!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
67. She would be a great choice!
Before she was Governor, she was a great AG-better than the current one, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. agreed, she has the chops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
71. great choice.
she has alot to offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
81. Unsane, I agree, I like her for SCOTUS, but what's the deal
besides myself, ahema, you're the only one who has posted to this in the last two days.

Is she paying you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #81
86. oh come on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC