Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How about Holbrooke for Secretary of State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:19 AM
Original message
How about Holbrooke for Secretary of State
His name came up on another thread and I remembered a time when Biden suggested him (Biden was deflecting a question about himself for VP or Sec. of State, and Holbrooke was in the audience, so it was hard to tell quite how serious Biden was in saying "Whoever has Holbrooke as secretary of State will be fine." - this was in February).

I don't know a lot about him except he's former U.N. Ambassador under Clinton, supported her for President, and Biden, Kerry, and Feingold have all referred to him kindly. At the SFRC hearing on Afghanistan in January, it was clear he knows Afghanistan/Pakistan issues very well, and he was willing to criticize Bush policies ("This emperor really has no clothes.").

I'm sure DUers know more, so please inform me.

(I think Kerry would be fantastic (tons of experience, foreign languages, knows the details in the hotspots, well-respected on foreign policy), but I'd also hate to lose his other strengths in the Senate.)

Thread from October, Holbrooke discussing Obama's strengths:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x7627007

Article from August about Holbrooke as an Obama advisor:
http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_stump/archive/2008/08/28/162711.aspx

Thread from July about Obama's foreign policy advisors:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=405x6450

Article from 2004 about possible Sec. of State for Kerry
http://articles.latimes.com/2004/apr/11/news/adna-foreignside11

Wiki listing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Holbrooke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's a neocon hawk, not much different than Paul Wolfowitz in my book.
Hell no. Enough with this crap. I'm not feeling warm and fuzzy about any of the folks being talked about.

If folks like Larry Summers, Hoolbrooke, Emmanuel, Gates, etc or going to be running the government, I'm sorry to say, but that change you were looking for ain't coming. You might get some incremental tidbits, but change on a fundamental level is not forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Is there some reading you can point me to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Richard Holbrooke was one of the biggest Iraq regime change hawks.
http://www.usembassy.it/file2001_01/alia/a1011102.htm

But lately he has called for a change in Iraq strategy. He's a neocon to the fullest. He has a history. The Timor controversy under Carter for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. thanks - will save that to read tomorrow - I noticed the Timor stuff in the Wiki link
but I never know how much to trust Wiki.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I can accept one or two
But if it keeps coming like this, I'll have to agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. oh, and by the way, I'm appalled at rumor of Summers, and don't get the Gates thing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. i think maybe they are keeping Gates so Wes Clark can take over in i think 2 years
i don't think he is allowed to serve now because you have to be out of the military for some years.

this way he can also be the token they keep on from the previous administration. Bush kept on Norman Mineta from the clinton administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. that makes some sense - I saw speculation on here that Clark could get in
though some "act of Congress" level measure or something as an exception.

Better than keeping Rice or Rumsfeld or Mukasey or something, but I'd rather he keep someone a little less powerful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Actually, Holbrook is different from Wolfowitz......
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 03:33 AM by FrenchieCat
Very different....unless Wolfowitz was nominated for the Nobel Peace prize seven times as well as served as UN Ambassador under Bill Clinton. Holbrook also served in the Carter Administration, and served as an advisor for John Kerry during the 2004 campaign.

I think that we run into a real risk if we start to typify everyone as being like everyone else in the way that you are doing. When I supported Wes Clark back in 2004, I ran into a lot of folks here at DU who were more than happy to call Wes Clark a war criminal, etc., etc...... Why? Because he wasn't "liberal" enough for them based on what they demanded.

Perhaps you are so extremely liberal until you believe that Obama is supposed to appoint other folks than who he is looking to possibly appoint. Perhaps you are looking for a Dennis Kucinich to become Secretary of State. If so, you might as well get your disappointment going right now, and not even wait till the man gets into office......because you will be very unhappy before the next week is over.

In terms of believing that there is no change coming because you don't agree with whom is being looked at now is a personal statement that reflects your feelings. I believe that change is coming, it just won't be achieved in the way that you have determined it needs to manifest itself in your eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thanks for your thoughts
Wolfowitz is quite an extreme character in my book, and not every moderate or even hawkish point of view should be lumped with him.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I just think it is dangerous when we kind paint with a broad brush....
Cause we don't come out smarter for it.

I personally don't care much for Holbrook....because I do find him quite status quo.

I would much prefer Samantha Power as Sec. of State. Now that would be a breath of fresh air....but then, that's if we lived in a liberal country, which we don't; not really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. is she still linked to the Obama team any more? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. She's there somewhere......but not on the team....sadly.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. So you believe Holbrooke's positions are reasonable?
And his call for Iraqi regime change, ala PNAC back in 2001. We all know about his Nobels and yada yada yada. I'm talking about his views on America's role in the world, not just his resume.

And no, I am not "extremely liberal" person who thinks Kucinich should be appointed SOS. I just don't want warmongers running the state department.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I believe that Holbrooke is a gifted Diplomat who is too status quo
for me. But I don't equate him to Wolfovitz. Sorry.

Who do you suggest for the SOS job? Please give us your list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. "too status quo"
nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Who do you suggest?
It's nice to rant. It's constructive to offer alternatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. that's what I wonder too - I figure whoever it is will have pluses and minuses. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. at the SFRC hearing on Afghanistan, Feingold called him a friend he was glad was there
and I don't consider Feingold a warmonger so I'm a bit confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
30. Right about Holbrooke. He was happiest when we were bombing
Belgrade. Anyone remember that? Yes, we didn't have enough to do, so we decided to get involved in a Balkans war. He is indeed a neocon who believes that the USA is the policeman of the world. Nobody has appointed us to that job, but so what? We'll just show up uninvited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Holbrooke = neocon PNAC/PPI warmonger
Fuck that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm asking for help learning about this - can you point me in the right direction
rather than just swearing at me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. in 2001 he made comments about Iraq and Saddam and WMD
and other things the neocons were saying.

but he has a very long history and record and should be judged on all of that rather than just these few comments. did he push for the war in Iraq ? what were his views throughout and now. these things matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. that July thread and the Wiki entry in the OP are mixed reviews of him but I wonder
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 02:53 AM by JoeIsOneOfUs
what perspective DUers have on it

for the July thread - stuff on Holbrooke is near the bottom of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Bakery Wagon Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. here's a start
"Project For A New American Century Signatories:

There are interesting names on both lists - Some I wasn't aware of."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3664992

How reliable is "king george. biz? I don't know but I DO know that he thought the bombing of the TV station
in Kosovo was a hoot.

Is Holbrooke change we can believe in? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. You are right that the link in that DU thread leads to a blog site....
but the list at the blog site is not sourced.

Wes Clark was the one in charge of the Bombing of the TV station in Kosovo.

Here's some information on that incident......
http://www.rapidfire-silverbullets.com/2007/03/facts_on_the_1999_rts_tv_stati.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. This is the first time I have heard Holbrook for SoS.
Another out of left field choice I've now heard of is Susan Rice. She sounds like an interesting choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. She's certainly knowledgeable from what I've heard in interviews
and she's close to Obama. I think she was undersec. of state for Africa under Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
22. Big time hawk, propagandist on the Russia/Georgia mess n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Got a link with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. what I read of him on Georgia sounded no different than Obama's position? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC