Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

G 20 Econ Summit??? Very Important??? Global Economies Threatened? Where was OBAMA??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:19 AM
Original message
G 20 Econ Summit??? Very Important??? Global Economies Threatened? Where was OBAMA??
Ya would think Monkey Boy and his Crew would invite the nx Prez to this meeting with the Leaders of the World...

To NOT INVITE P E OBAMA clearly shows the SHALLOWNESS of Bush....

He is such an asshole....so selfcentered he doesn't even realize what he did with this ommission....

How Shallow is this classless idiot? Apparently.....Obviously....very shallow....Country First my ASS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought he was invited but declined?
It's hard to tell from the way the talking heads talk on tv. Maybe someone with more specifics will tell us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's what I heard as well.
He has continually said - "One President at a time". I would think such a summit under an Obama Presidency would have an entirely different tone and goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. I believe Obama was invited but chose to send representatives instead.
It is consistent with his message of one President at a time. Bush is in charge of this summit. Obama's people will give him an overview of what was discussed and if there was anything beneficial from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama did not think it was appropriate - one president at a time
However, he sent a bipartisan (one republican and one democrat) to attend and give him feedback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Its my Bad for not knowing about any invitation...but Bush shoulda INSISTED, let Obama run the damn
thing and step aside....thats what a good leader in this sit does...whats in the best interest of the nation comes First...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I disagree. Obama was correct to stay away, and Bush was correct not to push it.
There's no telling what the next couple of months might bring; and those leaders need to know/understand that Bush is still the president and the one who will get credit or blame for any stupid shit this government does.

When Obama is in the last couple of months of his presidency, I wouldn't want the new president-elect to start throwing his weight around and pushing Obama out of the way.

I can't stand Bush and wish Obama could take the oath today. But that's not possible, so we (and the rest of the world) are stuck with Bush until 1/20/09.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You may well be right...not gonna argue...I just think its an op lost
The mission is a global one....hence a collective effort...I was looking at it that way...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Bad for Obama to get accountability without authority
That would set him up to get sandbagged by Bush on his way out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Albright and Leach, I believe. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. O.P.A.A.T.
The real question is why do it now and not in February or March?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC