Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There should be absolutely no question that Bill Richardson is the most qualified candidate for SoS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:17 PM
Original message
There should be absolutely no question that Bill Richardson is the most qualified candidate for SoS
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 06:19 PM by Double_Talk_Express
Out of the three most discussed candidates....only ONE has actually done serious negotiations with foreign countries all over the world and won a Nobel Peace Prize for them. Bill Richardson.

I really don't know why this isn't a no-brainer at this point. I respect HRC and Kerry but they are not as qualified for the job as Richardson is....they need to remain in the Senate, where they are best-suited IMO. This is absolutely no time for a political appointment for such an important cabinet position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's absurd. Why do you STILL know very little about the last Dem presidential nominee.
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 06:28 PM by blm
What a shame.

Try reading the National Security Archives. Just because corpmedia doesn't WANT the public to know much about this nation's actual historic record, doesn't mean activist Democrats need go along with the dumbing down.

Try this for starters:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=7826276&mesg_id=7826276

And I don't even WANT Kerry in SoS because I believe we need him leading investigations into Bush2 the way he uncovered so many crimes of Bush1 and his cronies, but, I'll be damned if I'm going to let the low information delegation misrepresent his SERIOUS foreign policy credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Sorry BLM, love and admire Kerry but what has he done to accrue real diplomatic and
negotiating skills?

That's an honest question.

I know he's done lots of investigating. I hope Obama gives him room in the Senate to do some digging and that Obama has the GUTS to pursue certain things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Did you read any of ProSense's post and hit any link? Here, I'll post link again...
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 11:13 AM by blm
.http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=7826276&mesg_id=7826276

A shame corpmedia has kept so much from the American people - too bad Kerry didn't hire a PUBLICIST to push his accomplishments over the DECADES, including some heavy duty negotiations globally. But then, the matters he handled certainly had no appeal to the media talking heads and their import tends to be lost when big stories like stained blue dresses happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agree, but Disagree
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 06:24 PM by Bad Thoughts
I think you are correct in assessing Richardson's qualifications, but this is not merely a question of finding the best resume. I like Richardson's credentials: he has shown that he can negotiate in tough situations, not just shake hands and remember names. Indeed, a great FP team would have Biden, Richardson at state, Clark or Rice as NSA, and (maybe) Clinton at Defense, with Kerry becoming chair/Senate Foreign Relations. But ultimately, this is Obama's choice. We gave him that power when we elected him. If he wants Kerry or Clinton, that's his choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm leaning toward Richardson myself
He's quite a personable fellow . I think
he would make an Excellent Secretary of State .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. He is not more "qualified" then General Clark
both are outstanding men with great credentials and would do a great job at State, but "most qualified" is subjective ergo I'll throw my two cents worth in. General Clark is the most qualified. I choose not to go through answering the absurd question of why. If you know of Richardson's credentials then you should be up to speed with the General's diplomatic portfolio. Not to mention his administrative experience. A four star general versus a governor is a no contest relative to administrative duties experience and responsibilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Right. Clark. Richardson. Clinton. Rice. Holbrooke. They're ALL good.
Man, have we got a deep bench!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. We've had a great bench for quite some time
but I've yet to get over the Ryne Sandberg for Ivan Dejesus trade. hey, what forum am I in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Hell, I'm still in near-catatonic shock over the Frank Robinson for
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 11:31 AM by Old Crusoe
Milt Pappas trade.

Milt Pappas!?!?! I mean, for God's sake...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Richardson's been nominated for the Nobel; he's never WON it though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ricjhardson did not win a Nobel Peace Prize
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. There are plenty of good people who haven't run for president.
How about me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Righties were sliming both him and John Kerry, which means that both are more suited for the SoS
Much more than Hillary Clinton who they suddenly seem to love. Wonder why....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sorry, Kerry is the most qualified. The only reason he hasn't been offered is his damn Senate

Foreign Relations Chair...

From what I have been reading, they don't want Feingold to chair, too much of a 'partisan' hot potatoe

Kerry deserves the position. He is the best man for the job. But, I don't think he will get it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. Bill Richardson is very qualified and may become the next SOS. Or not.
I'm counting several very qualified souls for that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. I totally agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. Agree 100% percent
THE most qualified for that job and the most suited for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
18.  I like that Richardson and Kerry are bilingual.
It suggests a global sensitivity and mastery. Most foreign heads of state speak our language. I don't think it's asking too much for our SOS to demonstrate interest and command of another language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC