Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which Republican would you feel most comfortable with in Obama's cabinet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:23 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which Republican would you feel most comfortable with in Obama's cabinet?
Note: some of these individuals have officially left the GOP--but they still count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. BTW, sorry about the RickPoll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wouldn't mind Jesse Helms...
Although I disagree with his politics--there's no real damage that he
could inflict, at this point.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. What's a little post-mortem stench, among "friends..."
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chafee or Snowe
It is always stunning to me that I'm the one attacked as some sort of right wing plant when I see polls like this on DU.

Hagel? Powell? Really???

No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well. I voted for Hagel.
Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Both voted against HR114? Or was that Chafee only?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. And? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. An important, though not the only, point to some of us.
And I WAS asking, but nevermind; I'll go look it up.

I like OS, I really do! HR114 is just an important orienting point for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. So I have to look up HR 114?
And figure out which HR 114 you're specifically referring to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Otherwise known as the IWR.
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 05:13 PM by patrice
Pardon my obtuseness.

Perhaps I should have said HR114 '02

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. That was actually H.J. 114
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 05:16 PM by sandnsea
The first HR 114 I found was a property tax resolution.

Anyway, I sincerely hope you let go of that as your primary criteria for judging politicians. It's how a lot of people ended up enamored with Ron Paul.

I think it would be great if the Green Party were the Party Obama had to worry about appealing to. But I can't seem to get anybody on this board to see the wisdom in that.

Wouldn't it be great if the Republicans were the radical right wing fringe that nobody paid any attention to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I won't tell you what your value system should be if you won't tell me mine.
Condescend much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Wow. You responded to my post
expressing your value system. But I can't?

What the hell is condescending about hoping that people don't use the IWR as their political meter for the rest of their lives?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. You were telling me what shouldn't be important to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Did you miss the word "primary"?
Or do you just not understand what it means in the context of the sentence I wrote?

And yes, now I am being condescending. Which is a whole hell of a lot more polite then what I'd be if you were standing right in front of me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. wow
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Either put down the booze or take your pill
You're nuts.

And now go alert on me. Run. Hurry.

Good fucking god what a nutbin this place is some days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Neither, thanks. But perhaps you should take your own advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. HJR114 = either monumental cupidity or selling People down the river.
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 05:51 PM by patrice
In either case, it's an important point in the political history of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. A dead one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm the Snowe vote and I did so because I am reconsidering my former position
of "no Republicans ever." Here's why:

We need broad consensus in this country on some basic issues and we won't get it until the Republican Party as it is now formulated is strangled out of existence. We cannot survive as a country with its toxic brew of being racist, sexist, anti-science, homophobic and anti public education. We can't. Therefore, it would make sense for us to "help along" those Republicans we can do business with on a serious level. When Ike was president, he was a proponent of family planning, for example. We knew when Stevenson was defeated that we wouldn't have a wild eyed, brimstone and hellfire preachers making federal policies. Darwin was taught in the public schools. Public education was valued because it lifted everybody up. We differed on lots of things but not the basics that made our society strong. It enabled us to make that breakthrough on racial equality and then onto women's equality (lawyers in Nixon's Justice Dept. wrote the Equal Pay Act!). Gerald Ford supported the Equal Rights Amendment and Betty Ford was actively pro-choice. You get my drift...

If more Republicans get more liberalism bred into them, we will be a better country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Jim Jeffords.
A republican turned independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. To make sure that we don't regret their appointment...
a dead one.

Abraham Lincoln would be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Olympia Snowe, because she's capable, and we can use that seat.
Susan Collins, I'm afraid, is not qualified for a Cabinet post. She's not very bright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lincoln Chafee*
* with an asterisk because he is now an Independent...

Otherwise... Snowe, I guess, b/c she does hold some socially moderate views. However, I was disappointed with how little she and Collins ever stood up to *, even when he was advocating for ideas that went against what I perceived to be their principes, when he was popular; neither of them are exactly profiles in courage...

I'm not really comfortable with Repugs in any defense-related positions. Even those who later "saw the light," like Powell and Hagel, were far too comfortable playing the neocon game when their standing up on principle could have really made a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I always liked Chafee
He was the only Repub who voted against Bush and said so publicly, in 2004 airc. He's a decent guy, unlike so many of the rest of the current Repub Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Lincoln Chaffee isn't a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. None, fuck that shit
Fuck that bipartisan, reach across the aisle and get screwed shit. We've tried that time and again and what do we have to show for it? An illegal, immoral war, a shredded Constitution, and an economy sliding into the abyss.

What I would much rather see is somebody like Kucinich in as Health and Human Serivces Secretary, but we know that's not going to happen, the Democrats would much rather play political footsie with their equally corporately corrupt opposites across the aisle that elevate one of the few in Congress who has been on the right side of the issues for years, and who isn't corporately corrupted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MgtPA Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Susan Eisenhower, dammit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Aside from Abe Lincoln, none.
They're all ass kissing traitors, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nipper1959 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. Other
Abraham Lincoln is the ONLY republican worth considering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. Other
Bob Rumson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. It's time for serious people.
And his 15 min are up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC