Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are Repub/neocons pushing Hillary for Sec. of State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:14 PM
Original message
Why are Repub/neocons pushing Hillary for Sec. of State
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 06:17 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because as a member of the DLC she has many of the same interests?
Just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
az chela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. They are all her friends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think Obama is being pushed to make her SOS.
I don't know who is the culprit but the media is sure doing a good job of pushing the matter, and if it isn't so, many will be in for a let down. If it's coming from Obama then fine but if it isn't, the matter sure is putting pressure on him to do so--which I don't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And it will make him appear WEAK right out of the gate.
If she was appointed, it is going to be an avalanche of "Obama had to have Hillary answer the 3 a.m. call for him" and where's all the change, you might as well call it Clinton, Part III.

There was already a comment in the Washington post from a Clintonite asking where is the change he talked about, it's all Clinton people in the admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. If Hillary would campaign for him in 50+ rallies in a month or so...
...then I think it's clear she would support his agenda. Thus your theory is quite unfounded.

What it would show is that he's a man of character, able to handle a diverse cabinet, one that he knows will be a challenge in and of itself.

And that seems indeed to be what he is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrockford Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. blah blah blah blah. So what if she campaigned for him, that's how it usually works when you lose
You don't need a divisive cabinet for it to be a diverse one. I don't think it is "clear" she supports his agenda, just because she did as the machine dictates (eventually).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. There are enough challenges to deal with without having to deal with the dysfunctional Clinton drama
Plus, trustworthiness and honesty doesn't seem to be the Clintons strong suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
60. Exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. This is a theory being pushed by many DUers, that Obama is being "put in a box."
That if he were to make the decision to pick her it would only be by her "media conspirators" forcing him to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. No, no that's not what I'm fully implying.
That could be ONE facet. However, I remember hearing or reading years ago that Jimmy Carter wanted to run things a certain way but he had some of the establishment directing which way to go on certain matters and on who to appoint to what positions. I remember it being said he was very sad about it after he got into office--that he wasn't as in control as he would've liked to have been.

Afterall, he has many members of his transition team who are very established already. Then again, he has the power to say who belongs on his transition team and who doesn't.

Obama was very tight-lipped about his cabinet in the 60 Minutes interview tonight, so I imagine he is letting them do their work and hopefully he has the last sayso. He seemed amenable to the way Lincoln did things. It sounds like he really might be considering such a move similar to the way Lincoln governed. Time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. Because picking her doesn't make a heck of a lot of sense otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because she is one of them. The want the Clintons to control foreign policy.
Because anyone who thinks Obama will control that arena once the Clintons are put in charge is really smoking something.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zuul9 Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Get ready for a loooooot of drama if she gets in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because She And Bill Are Goldwater Conservatives?
They've just finally realized that, based on their records, The Clintons are ideological Goldwater Conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Hey, Hillary voted against FISA, Obama FOR it!!!! Obama supports the embargo on Cuba..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Political posturing! She wants to eat Mexican babies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
51. The Clintons are the Republican "Democrats" they run when they know the country has had enough
of the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because they can't wait for the confirmation hearings
to drag the the entire Clinton legacy up again. They just love that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. That one, too. They are rabid for it. Some members of DU would also be similarily gnawing at the...
...opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
50. I'm guessing a confirmation will be surprisingly easy
A few of them might have some tough questions, but Senatorial courtesy will make it generally smooth sailing because Obama likely would have consulted leaders of both parties to ensure it will go smoothly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. For the same reason many were pushing Rahm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TripleKatPad Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe they are afraid of her?
Push for the one you don't want in hopes of getting someone else? I dunno. Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. My guess - infotainment news asked them to comment and it gets airplay. A TV dance is all.
I pay little heed to the political talking heads and expert commentary played out on on TV nowadays.

The Obama transition team - and Pres. elect Obama - will make the choices for cabinet, in due time and after due consideration.

The rest is filler.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Exactly, they're getting asked, and giving reasonable answers.
There are dozens of other people who you might consider liberals who are having similar sentiments when asked the same question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. That's the first thing that came to my mind too: reasonable Repub/neocons
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. Neocons aren't necessarily reasonable, but they can be reasonable.
Reason something which is not your strong suite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R. Bill Kristol said EXACTLY why he wants her for Sec. of State and it goes against
everything Obama stood for in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because they can attack her and Bill for the next 4-8 years.
DON'T DO IT O!

Nooooooooo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. So, why are you blaming the Clintons for this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. The neocons are pushing her b/c they are scared of her and they know liberal reactionaries
will hear their endorsements, freak out in a hissy fit, and collectively force Obama not to appoint her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yeah, just like they were terrified of Hillary becoming President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. Because they are trying to turn the Hillary cultists to the dark side by
making it look as though Obama disses Hillary if he does not name her to be SoS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. Because that's one way they can sow the seeds of dissension among Democrats.
Republicans, and especially neocons, do not want to see unity in our party. There would be nothing better for the Republican party right now that infighting among Democrats. The more unity in our ranks behind Obama, the better his chances of making the changes this country desperately needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Which begs the question:
Who were the two Democratic sources who started the rumor that Hillary was offered the job?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. That's a very good question and one that I certainly can't answer.
We may find out in time, but I rather doubt that we will every know for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. ProSense believes the leaks came from "Clintonites." I'm still very confused by these conspiracy
theories. For example, I don't understand how Hillary can force the leader of the party to make her SOS. Another thing is that many Hillary supporters aren't clamoring to see her as SOS, so it's not like we'll be upset if she doesn't get it. What makes us upset is all the Hillary-bashing, "Clintons are evil" kind of posts and insinuations that the Clintons are somehow forcing the media to report on this rumor. Someone really needs to explain to me why they'd want to see articles in the paper about vetting and possible conflicts of interest. It just all seems to me like more smears against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #40
55. I've been confused about it too. Maybe I'm just not devious enough
to understand these conspiracy theories,but, like you, I don't see how anyone can force a cabinet selection on Obama. If I was going to subscribe to any theories at all, I would think it more likely that someone is trying to damage Hillary's image by making her appear to still be "against" Obama. I've seen posters even here, on a Democratic board, make some of the most outrageous statements about her motives that I think some people want to see her utterly destroyed for no other reason than she opposed Obama during the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrockford Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. Because she's bought and sold by Israel, just like them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. DING DING DING DING DING DING DING!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. It's obvious from his "60 Minutes" interview
that Obama isn't going to play the speculation game.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. She's already made her intentions clear with two words and one horrible vote
She will do all in her power to give the Likudist bastards what they have wanted for years, the complete annihilation of Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
38. How many Hillary-for-SOS threads do you have? Get a fucking life n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. You're policing DU threads to see which deserves your whining and think you have a "fucking life"?
:nopity:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. Same people that were obsessed with her during the primaries.....
Are spiraling back into it. Proof that irrational obsessions don't ever go away, they just fester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. "Irrational " like lying about coming under sniper fire,
threatening to obliterate Iran, supporting cluster bombs, hiring Mark Penn as a strategists, making an issue of Bill Ayers and questioning Obama's patriotism? Irrational like that?

That's the kind of irrational that shouldn't be sent to the head the State Dept.

Same people that were obsessed with her during the primaries.....


You're wrong. Some people despised her actions during the primaries.

The OP wasn't about the primary, you brought it up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. It's just clumsy subterfuge from people who would rather deflect than discuss.
They either can't handle the truth or they're feeling icky about being fine with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #47
54. You need to see an exorcist or something
Really, it is time to move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. You're the one who brought up the primary
Get over it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
42. After her batshit crazy blustery talk about obliterating Iran, they consider her one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. C'mon sweetie, the primaries are over
Just because Obama won doesn't mean you have to devolve.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zuul9 Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Were just concerned for the safety of his presidency. She lost. Get over it !!!
That woman should be kept as far away from Obama as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #46
52. Ive never supported her
I just hate bigotry, so sue me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. that kind of hawkish rhetoric has no place in the Democratic party
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 04:53 AM by AtomicKitten
and your incessant deflection is heavy on the poo and not so much on the nice

edited
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. Why are those who were the most obsessed with the Clintons during the primaries....
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 08:39 AM by niceypoo
....spiraling back down into it again?

"After her batshit crazy blustery talk about obliterating Iran, they consider her one of them"

Oh, and take your own advise, sweetie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #53
59. here, let me explain this to you
DU rules prohibit personal attacks against other DU members, something you do frequently when you are frustrated by not being able to defend your point of view.

Hillary Clinton isn't your mother or your sister or your significant other, although you and others here have certainly glommed onto her as if she were.

She is a politician and as such DU members are entitled to discuss her here without personal attacks. Link to DU rules: http://www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules.html

You're welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
45. ...
Because she is a right wing witch who will kill us all (or that is what some DUers will tell you)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
56. They want her out of the Senate, and they get to look "bipartisan" about it.
Seems pretty straitlaced to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qibing Zero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
58. One word: hawk
Clinton is much more gung-ho about the military option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
61. Who Cares? It's Irrelevant.
Can't wait for her to be confirmed!!!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
62. Hoping to take advantage of that PUMA split when Obama does NOT make her SOS.

The GOP is not entirely stupid. They see the writing on the wall. They can not maintain power with their White Man Only coalition. So they keep looking for ways to make inroads into other groups. And they will do anything possible short of actually empowering those groups.

When Obama got nominated for the US Senate, and it came out that his Republican opponent routinely brutalized his wife sexually, the GOP took one look at Obama and immediately got their very own Black man to run against him thinking this would split the African-American vote in Chicago. Apparently, there were no African-American Republicans in Illinois at the time as they nominated a man from Maryland instead.

When Hillary did not get the nomination, nor selected as the vice-presidential nominee, they rushed out and found their own female VP candidate thinking this would split the Democratic female vote.

With Obama as the President-elect the GOP is talking about putting an African-American in as head of the RNC.

Given this track record of ineptitude, this whole Hillary-as-SOS stunt would seem to be the exact same thing: stupid GOP tricks.

The GOP is not entirely stupid. But they are entirely stupid on all things not 100% White and Male.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC