Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just In on CNN: Clinton vetting moving forward

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:02 PM
Original message
Just In on CNN: Clinton vetting moving forward
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 05:24 PM by mollymongold
sources Ex-Pres is being scrutinized and vetted right now on his finances, etc...

OBAMA OFFICIAL SHOT DOWN POLITICO STORY SAYING THE CLINTONS WERE BEING AGGRAVATING, OBAMA OFFICIAL SAYING STORY WAS 'JUST NOT TRUE.'

edit for the article:

CHICAGO (CNN) – Two Obama transition officials confirm they have begun taking a look at former President Bill Clinton’s finances and post-presidential dealings as part of the early vetting process into whether or not there’s any negative information to wave President-elect Barack Obama off from consideration of Sen. Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.

The officials said the transition team is seeking unspecified records from the former president to get a better handle on issues related to his foundation work and presidential library to try and deal with potential conflicts of interest if Sen. Clinton is nominated for the post.

While the officials refused to say how quickly the information is being turned over, they are refuting a Politico report suggesting transition officials are exasperated by slow cooperation from the Clintons.

“That is just not true,” said one of the Obama transition officials

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/17/obama-team-vetting-bill-clinton-sources-say/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link?
I have been watching CNN and didn't see/hear anything of the sort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. it was just on a minute ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
10.  I was watching CNN "a minute ago" and didn't see/hear anything of the sort
So unless you have a link to something... it's hard to believe the coincidence, considering you were attacking Politico
ten minutes ago for getting things wrong about the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Sure you were. I guess you missed the big 'JUST IN' headline that was just on.
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 05:17 PM by mollymongold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. What'd you expect? Good cop, bad cop. Well-done, Team O, as always.
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 06:03 PM by ClarkUSA
Notice the unnamed sources/"officials" declined to comment on how slow the vetting was going....

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Just admit that you want to believe the politico story reallllly badly, no matter what Obama's team
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 05:23 PM by mollymongold
says. I guess you're still claiming that I made this up and didn't really see it a minute ago too, since you were watching CNN right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. What I believe is Team O said what they had to say and since when did you believe unnamed sources?
Still waiting for that list of unnamed sourced stories Politico got wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Is it going to hurt realllllly bad for you when Hillary is selected?
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 05:38 PM by mollymongold
it will be okay...:hug:

Yes, believe some news bloggers on the politico over CNN (which you lied about watching) if that makes you feel better.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. If Team O is smart enough to reject her as VP, they're smart enough to reject her as SoS
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 05:48 PM by ClarkUSA
For the same reasons, too. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. go back to *watching cnn*, dear
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 05:43 PM by mollymongold
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #51
68. Welcome to DU. How'd you find us, by the way?
Because your manner and tone sound awfully familiar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. thank you, detectiveClarkUSA. I have no idea how I found du, I found it on as a link from
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 06:48 PM by mollymongold
another page probably or doing a search for something. How about yourself? How did you find DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
53. Will you cry when she isn't?
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I saw it live five minutes ago.
Good enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abacus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I just read something similar on CNN's Political Ticker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Here it is...
While the officials refused to say how quickly the information is being turned over, they are refuting a Politico report suggesting transition officials are exasperated by slow cooperation from the Clintons.

“That is just not true,” said one of the Obama transition officials.

Filed under: Barack Obama • Bill Clinton

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/17/obama-team-vetting-bill-clinton-sources-say/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOVE that sig line!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. WHAT DID YOU SAY? I COULDNT HEAR YOU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I said:
sources Ex-Pres is being scrutinized and vetted right now on his finances, etc...

OBAMA OFFICIAL SHOT DOWN POLITICO STORY SAYING THE CLINTONS WERE BEING AGGRAVATING, OBAMA OFFICIAL SAYING STORY WAS 'JUST NOT TRUE.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Lol!

Thanks for the laugh!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I heard the Obama camp denial too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Sure you did... like I believe someone who calls every other DUer an "Hillary Hater"
Nice try. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Ha! Funny, I almost added "not that some of you will believe me." I guess I should have.
All I know is that I heard it during the Situation Room. I believe it was Ed Henry who said it. But don't believe me. I don't care. Really. Seriously. Not at all. My feelings aren't hurt. Not even a bit...





PLEASE BELIEVE ME CLARKUSA!!! WITHOUT U I AM NOTHING!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Funny!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Aw, you two should take your act to Vegas. Call it "The Travelling Pantsuit Tour"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #38
65. Ohhh, poor baby.
Chill out.

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Now they are going to say that the denial was just Obama being nice. ROFL...let it go
when those types get hyped up there's no stopping them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. damn, it's like they have some sort of clinton derangement syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. from the Guardian
Hillary Clinton to accept Obama's offer of secretary of state job
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/17/hillary-clinton-secretary-of-state

Hillary Clinton plans to accept the job of secretary of state offered by Barack Obama, who is reaching out to former rivals to build a broad coalition administration, the Guardian has learned.

Obama's advisers have begun looking into Bill Clinton's foundation, which distributes millions of dollars to Africa to help with development, to ensure that there is no conflict of interest. But Democrats do not believe that the vetting is likely to be a problem.

Clinton would be well placed to become the country's dominant voice in foreign affairs, replacing Condoleezza Rice. Since being elected senator for New York, she has specialised in foreign affairs and defence. Although she supported the war in Iraq, she and Obama basically agree on a withdrawal of American troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, that'll melt some brains here.
Politico's article thread: 166 responses.

Obama's camp denying it thread: 6 responses.

The audible gasp will create a wind tunnel..........

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's going to be Hillary, and she and Bill will agree to Obama's terms for Bill.
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 05:15 PM by TexasObserver
I was never sure until this year how committed Bill would be to advancing Hillary over himself, but this year he proved he really is her number one fan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. And something that I think that has been lost in this discussion
of Bill and how he will act, blah, blah, blah....is that he completely and totally humiliated his wife by having an affair.

He owes her big time for standing by his side and giving him another chance.

I think him setting aside any and all ambitions if it will mean Hillary will be SoS isn't too much to ask, frankly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
69. yes, Bill does owe her big time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. I saw that too. The rumors were true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'll finally know what it feels like when your own head explodes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. THIS CAN'T POSSIBLY BE TRUE!!1!!1
I have it on good authority that this is all a ruse cooked up by the Clintons to mess with Obama and that he has no interest in hiring her!1!!1!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. Obama team vetting Bill Clinton, sources say

Obama team vetting Bill Clinton, sources say

Posted: 04:50 PM ET

From CNN White House Correspondent Ed Henry

CHICAGO (CNN) – Two Obama transition officials confirm they have begun taking a look at former President Bill Clinton’s finances and post-presidential dealings as part of the early vetting process into whether or not there’s any negative information to wave President-elect Barack Obama off from consideration of Sen. Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.

The officials said the transition team is seeking unspecified records from the former president to get a better handle on issues related to his foundation work and presidential library to try and deal with potential conflicts of interest if Sen. Clinton is nominated for the post.

While the officials refused to say how quickly the information is being turned over, they are refuting a Politico report suggesting transition officials are exasperated by slow cooperation from the Clintons.

“That is just not true,” said one of the Obama transition officials.


From still unnamed sources, the excitement the the rumors are true? The Guardian reporting Hillary plans to accept the offer?

Which is it: consideration or actual offer?

Is Obama vetting Richardson and others? Why is it only Clinton information being leaked?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. What excitement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. no surprise.
Obama is not going to listen to the nutroots on this one. Mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. when have you been right once about Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. What have I been wrong about?
Is there some prediction I made about what he will do you remember? I really don't. If you are talking about the fact I didn't support him in the primary, I would say you are either a youngster with very little voting experience or an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa20 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. I can't wait until NOTHING TURNS UP
that would jeopardize this nomination. It will be the hugest slap to the media and DKos, Clinton haters here as well. The right already knows nothing will turn up, they've given up on Clinton hate before the left has. Its really something I tells ya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Yep, most of them are chill with her as SOS.
The left on the other hand........

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
41. Vetting is *standard procedure.*
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 05:36 PM by Starbucks Anarchist
Get off your cross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa20 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. and after this,
you'll see that the Clintons aren't so evil after all. I'm just sick of the left calling for investigations like the right did in the '90s, which they've even given up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Nobody's calling them evil.
We're wondering why the hell a standard procedure is seen as a personal witch hunt whenever it involves the Clintons. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. no, the Right are licking their lips. They thought the Clinton smorgasboard had gone away,
now they see the all you can eat buffet is possibly reopening and they can't hide their glee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. I think you may misunderstand what some people think they may find...
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 05:38 PM by DrToast
It doesn't have to be anything illegal or unethical that turns up. Hillary would be SoS and Bill could have ties to foreign entities that could be considered conflicts of interest. They could still be perfectly legal and nothing worth criticizing him over, but they could still pose a problem for her.

I don't think anyone is expecting them to turn up the secret plans to kill Vince Foster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. We already KNOW AS HISTORICAL FACT Bill Clinton's involved in unethical business deals
since leaving the White House.

It's not a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
62. I hope you're enjoying your stay
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa20 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. am I gonna be "banned" for sticking up
for 2 elite honoured leaders of my party and country? is that what you're implying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. I ain't implying shit other than
I hope you're enjoying your stay.

I enjoyed your posts in some other non-Clinton threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
36. You see how much drama the Clintons bring?
It's too much!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. the only people bringing the drama are the clinton haters who want to create controversy
where non exists....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Once and for all, I DO NOT HATE THE CLINTONS!!!
But to assert that they somehow must receive preferential treatment is beyond me. It's sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. who said they should get preferential treatment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. you are the one calling people drawing attention to Bill Clinton's unethical business dealshe
and both Clinton's penchant for drama "haters".

Are you really THAT ignorant when it comes to what Bill Clinton has been doing for money the last 8 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. Some people are asserting that neither she nor Bill be vetted. Why?
They have to go through the vetting process just like everyone else. There have been several threads started on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. I never said they shouldn't be vetted. I'm pushing back against the insinuation that they are
nothing but drama and only concerned about themselves, as if people know them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
58. amen nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
48. Welcome to DU
How'd you find this place?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. i've stayed out of here for 2 days so do you know if the HRC as SOS is official or is it
just speculation? I still haven't read anything in the newspaper about it being real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. From what I gather it's not official
It seems to be masturbatory fantasy by some (mainly the media and Republicans but some on DU too).

Obama may pick her but I doubt this speculation was raised by him, and if it was it was to not give it to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. k thanks, i'll continue to wait to hear from the man himself, same thing with the vote
on Lieberman, i'm done reading speculation threads.

Wow, there won't be much to read here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. That's because you're a hater.
HATER!!1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
57. Yes!!!
Fantastic news!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
67. Welcome to DU,
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
70. Unless something horrible turns up Hillary will be SoS.
You can count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC