Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lets get something straight......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Splinter Cell Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:08 PM
Original message
Lets get something straight......
The Clintons are not, and should not be the star of this show. Hillary was beaten fairly in the primaries, after she had run a nasty campaign. She lost. Obama doesn't owe her shit.

The Clintons have always got to be the center of attention, and it's getting VERY OLD.

I don't think the Clintons wanted Obama to win. To be honest, I really wouldn't be shocked if they voted for McLame. Everything is about their agenda. Yes, Bill Clinton did a great job for the most part as POTUS. Hillary is a great public servant as well. They just need to back off and let Obama have his time in the sun because he earned it.

It's just disgusting, that after the entire campaign, all the ups and downs, and we finally have victory, that the Clintons are again the focal point. Let's move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank the MSM.
They are Clintonophiles. Really. People blame the Clintons, but the truth is, the MSM is the entity creating all the drama here. Watch how both Bill and Hillary try to downplay the 'leaks', and note how the MSM completely disregards this. I have a long memory, and this shit is no different from what I witnessed with great consternation during the 1990's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Flamebait and primary rehash. Stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. I don't think it's flamebait. I agree with The Godfather a hundred percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Your agreement doesn't change it from flamebait to wisdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. That's very true. But your calling it flamebait does not, in itself, make it false, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Flamebait doesn't have to be untrue to be flamebait.
Again, you miss the point.

Flamebait is intended to inflame, typically to air some old grievance the OP cannot let go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tell the MEDIA
who likes to keep it stirred up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Clintons are not responsible for this current drama. The media is driving this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. THANK YOU!
Fuck! Someone here who really gets it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. So, the Obama team leaked this?
:shrug:

I have a really hard time believing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. Agreed
its noise that is all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is gonna turn into a flamefest
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, Obama should not be allowed to get his way!
It's not about his choice, it's about Me, ME, ME!

ha ha...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Its Obama's fault. He shouldn't have opened this can of worms with the Clintons
He has more than enough qualified people out there for SoS. There was no need to flirt with them on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. That's a good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. How is it you know more than Obama? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Its not about knowing more than Obama
Its a FACT. That there are several other people qualified for the position. And flirting with the Clintons wasn't necessary. You know when you flirt with them, there was going to be this drama or media obsession with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. If Obama picks her...
Then he feels she's the best person for the job.

I'm down with that, regardless of how I feel about Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I don't mind if she gets the job. My only point is
when people talk about the drama involved in this. They need to keep in mind, this is on Obama. Because he had to know what would come of this if it got out she was being considered or offered the job. I just laugh at the stories about The "Obama camp getting exasperated with the Clinton camp". They opened the can of worms, you had to know this would happen. There is no need to be exasperated, when you didn't have to go in this direction in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. That's been debunked though...
The Obama camps says it's not so.

Besides, the Obama camp are champs at ignoring the drama... and sometimes refusing it. I like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. Yeah, they are trying to tap down the resentments. Not necessarily debunked - played down. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. They (Obama Team) can still slam the door and give it to Bill "Judas" Richardson?!?
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 09:33 PM by ShortnFiery
I hope they do just that. :-)

*FYI: for non-political junkies, it was a Clintonite (James Carville) who called Bill Richardson "Judas" after he supported Obama and not HRC in the Primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sooo, do you blame Obama? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Both the primary and the general elections are over...
Obama won. He is clearing vetting Hillary for a spot on his team. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Splinter Cell Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. No
Obama won, the Clintons didn't.

They're not the idols of the party now. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. They'll have any roll in the Obama administration...
That Obama chooses, and that Clinton accepts. I'm fine with that. A lot of people are fine with that. I don't vote for "idols" anyway. If that's your game, have fun with it...

Ploink.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hellataz Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Think of it this way...
Obama is still the star, but the more positive light we can shine on Hilary, the more experience she gets and the more star power she achieves, it will be that much easier for her to succeed Obama and win the presidency in 8 years. What's good for Obama is good for her and visa versa because at it's core, they stand for the same things and keeping them both in the positive spotlight means good things for us democrats not only now but in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You just STFU with all that reasonable talk and rational thinking
It has no place here in DU with many folks.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hellataz Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. LOL, sorry forgot where i was....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Did I miss what was "rational" about wanting to build up Hillary right now?
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. And why would "we" want to shed positive light on Hillary right now?
lol

Seriously.

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Oh, I don't know - because she is a powerful Democrat that seems
to be supportive of the president elect and apparently she has been offered the SoS position. We Democrats have got to get over eating our own-it thins the herd of good people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Why should Hillary be a focus right now?
There are three undecided Senate races. Obama is transiting into the White House. Bush is trying to steal the silverware before he leaves. I don't see any immediate problem that involves focusing on Hillary. And I'm a vegetarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I'm not saying she should be a focus or not-I thought the discussion was
about Obama and his choosing her as SoS. She should be whatever Obama and she determine without all this BS that has surrounded her for forever. I couldn't be happier that Obama is president, but I did support her initially. When that didn't work, I shifted my energy and my heart to Obama without reservation. Apparently though, that is beyond a lot of the people that have hated her from the beginning. For crying out loud, can't y'all be good winners? And I don't necessarily mean you, it's just where this post has taken me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Obama wasn't my first choice by any means.
I think that some of you Hillary supporters forget that a lot of us shifted our support from our candidate to the party's choice, not only you all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. No, I don't think that - I do think that there is still quite a bit of rancor
surrounding the entire 'being' of Hillary Clinton and so many people that were against her candidacy are just as vociferously against her (still) as a living human. That's just my observation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. It's not unearned. Even beyond, before and after the primaries.
drama seems to stalk the Clintons. Maybe Bill more than Hillary and it just attaches to her. That's too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. We are unlikely to agree on this, but how refreshing that we disagreed
with one another without calling each other assholes or idiots or so many of the lovely epithets I have seen here in DU..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
42. HRC will be too old in 8 years. Besides, some of us detest present day family line dynasties. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. The media is the one stirring all this up.
I really don't give a hootin' damn if Obama chooses Hillary as SOS and she accepts.

Obama knows what he's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. Um, so Obama never asked her? This is Obama's decision.
DUH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. We could get it straight that Obama is making the decision and not you or I
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
36. I trust Obama. He is trying to UNITE the country, not UNTIE it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. I trust NO politician completely. Nobody deserves blind loyalty, especially politicians. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
40. i always stump for people whom i want to see lose. esp in battle ground statess
because that my friends is the great logic of the idiots on du
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
44. The Clintons get the attention not because they crave it, but because THEY DESERVE IT.
You just need to wake up to the fact that the Clintons are a thousand times better quality than what you give them credit for, and that's your fault, not theirs. Go read a fucking book sometime or the NYT and get some basic education about them instead of getting all your info from message boards that are loaded with more mis-information than information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Splinter Cell Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. Bullshit
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 12:39 PM by The Godfather
I know all about the Clintons and I was supporting them years ago like most of the people on DU. It's not hard to see, if you look into it, that the Clinton reality revolves around what's best for THEM, not the party or the country.

Bill Clinton did a good job as president. Hillary is a good senator. They just are not the center of attention anymore, and it eats them up. I'm tired of this shit. The Clintons will get my respect when they earn it, not just because he was better then Dubya has been. They can't stop pushing themselves on the party, and it's old. She couldn't accept that she wasn't crowned the nominee, so she stayed in the race until that last primary, even though she had fucking lost MONTHS before that. She had to have her video at the convention, even though you didn't see any of the other losing contenders for the nomination get that treatment. Anyone who endorsed someone in the party other then her was a "Judas" in the eyes of the Clinton camp.

It's time to move on. Stop giving to the Clintons just because they feel entitled to special attention. If Hillary is Obama's first choice for SOS, then by all means it's great imo. But I can't wash the feeling that it's just another move to keep them quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jjanpundt Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
46. I just wish they'd go away for awhile and give us a break n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
48. what it's going to lead to is a polarization of the party by the media . . .
it won't be long before they start talking about the "Obama faction" and the "Clinton faction" . . .

whether the characterization is correct or not is irrelevant . . . that's how it will be "reported" . . .

if real conflict doesn't exist, they'll simply make it up . . . happens all the time . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
49. I guess you just told Obama off, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
52. You left out Chelsea and Socks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC