Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If You Dont Support Hillary for SOS...What is your biggest Reason Against the pick?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:48 PM
Original message
Poll question: If You Dont Support Hillary for SOS...What is your biggest Reason Against the pick?
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 06:49 PM by hnmnf
This is an anonymous poll so you can all be truthful.

I just dont think that many people here are against her because of their "Hillary hate"


My reason has is choice 2. I just think there are better, more qualified people for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. A combination of options, plus others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. If this were an exam, you would get the question wrong of course :-)
Have to choose the BEST answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Waste of her talents. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. If your name is not BH Obama, then who gives a rat's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. A citizen of the United States of America?
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 06:55 PM by mikelgb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwei924 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bill Clinton's unnecessary drama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Among other reasons, unqualified. She was never a big foreign policy expert.
He's going for star power and political scheming, and not competence. Who's he going to pick for Health and Human Services, Sarah Palin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. A combination of #2 and 5
Bill Richardson is twenty times more qualified.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Ditto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Other - Bill Clinton can't keep it in his pants for 8 yrs - more embarrassment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. DUers not about teh hate?
It's the defining characteristic for many here.

I blame Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwei924 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. All the options in the poll are legitimate reasons for opposing someone for a position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. She is comparitively UNDER qualified. Her husband is incapable of keeping his mouth shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't hate her
just many of her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. So you've adopted the MF doctrine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Where is the CHANGE
when we turn back the clock to an earlier diplomatic era?

and it seems like a gift/legacy payback appointment rather than choosing the best person for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Other
I got no problem with Hillary as Secretary of State, but I think she will better in the Pentagon. That place needs to be purged of all the neocons and corrupt corporatists brought onboard by Rumsfeld and kept by Gates (Gordon England being a fine example!).

Hillary will kick ass in the Pentagon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. So then your choice would not be other, but you think she should be at some other cabinet position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. No, I think she will be fine at Foggy Bottom, but she will be better at the Pentagon
DOD needs a complete overhaul!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. There are better choices and I don't like the idea of this Clinton entitlement.
Clinton in this position sends nothing but a bad message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. Most of the above
I like her fine, but I think HHS is a better role for her, I think there are better people for SOS, and I think she'd be great if she stayed in the Senate. But I'm not too upset about it...if Obama believes his administration and the country will be best-served with her as Secretary of State I trust his judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Because she's a **********.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. Because she would be the greatest Attorney General since RFK
And she should be allowed to occupy that role
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. Other: World view too far to the right, too pro-Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kissinger endorsed her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. 1. Bill
2. I like her in the Senate and can see her doing very well there in a leadership role.

3. Others are better qualified for SOS.

4. The better cabinet spot for her would be HHS. She has been involved in HHS issues for a long time, and it is extremely important domestically but less visible, particularly abroad, so Bill wouldn't be as big a problem. Other posters have mentioned it and I think that they're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I guess HHS wouldn't feed the Clinton ego and sense of entitlement enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. Senate is better for long term impact
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. I don't want her for SOS for three reasons
1. I fear she'll be more powerful and more influential than Joe Biden.

2. I really wanted to turn the page from the Clinton years and not have either a Bush or Clinton in the White House for once in my life.

3. I think she could be an all-time great senator on the level of Ted Kennedy, if she wants to be, which clearly she doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'll honor President - elect Obama's decision on his Cabinet and on
other appointments.

That said, I would prefer Kerry or Richardson for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
30. I don't think war-advocates are a good fit for the Top Diplomat job.
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 09:12 PM by BlooInBloo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Thank you, BinB
She lost me with her calculating IWR vote in 2002. I was a big Clinton supporter in the 90s but now wish they'd just go away. Let some new people CHANGE the face of DC and our nation


We've been through this sort of recycling with Bush who populated Washington posts with people who cut their political teeth during the Nixon era and honed them with Poppy.

Enough already. We voted for CHANGE! Keep HRC in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Not just the 'yes' vote there, but the refusal to acknowledge that it was a mistake....
And then "obliterating" tens of millions of innocent men, women, and children.

That's not the kind of temperament I want in my SoS.

I do acknowledge, however, that it's an excellent POLITICAL move for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. A combiation of the answers, plus other reasons.
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 09:20 PM by political_Dem
Ultimately, I think we need new blood in terms of approaching the problems of today. America took a chance and picked someone who truly represented change. Now, change has to come to the cabinet posts as well.

It's getting tiring that the same people are asked to serve all that time.

The DLC'ers cannot have a lock on everything. We need to pick talent from different sources who will best serve the country. That's why a "cabinet of rivals" explanation cheapens the decision making process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
32. I'm neutral but leaning towards no simply because
I was a great admirer of hers for many many years, but her performance during the primaries makes me think she is a bad manager and has bad judgment when it comes to picking employees. I really want a great manager to be leading each department--and no drama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. blind, irrational hate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
37. Combination of choices #2 & #5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. She should stay in the Senate
and I would like to see as Senate Majority Leader!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC